04-14-2005, 09:04 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-rajesh_g+Apr 12 2005, 10:45 PM-->QUOTE(rajesh_g @ Apr 12 2005, 10:45 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->You'll be surprised how good Indian judges and judiciary can be. Did you think we'ed be quoting monkey judgements in our courts for the last 80 years? Indian judges wrote commanwealth law on evidence!<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes you are right.. Are you talking about the bail judgement in favor of JS ? Or perhaps you were talking about this ??
http://sankaracharyaarticles.blogspot.com/...p-with-sit.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->ollowing this, the Judge got angry and asked:
"If the police want to get information from a person they can go to that person and question him.Without having done that, how can you send summons to him?
The prosecutor must inform the special investigation team not to focus on other matters straying from the main investigation. Any such actions of theirs will become legally invalid .
A thought arises in my mind whether to send this kind of cases related to Sankaramutt to another judge. Because there is a possibility at a later date for a complaint that I do not give statements favourable to the Government in the Sankaramatam related cases,"said the [Honorable] Justice.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Re IC group dig here..
Hey man, we are talking about the day the seer got arrested - you sure it was before or after ? Happens, happens, dreams are like that onlee.. <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo--> <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I am talking about a hundred years of Indian jurisprudence. I am talking about 'Majumder on Evidence' - standard text in courts and chambers in the Commanwealth. But what would you know about these?
They way I see it, the judges were right on bail. No qualms here.
Wait till the trial for the rest. I will nail you, or you me!
I have been kind here - trust me. Next time I wont.
Pathma
Yes you are right.. Are you talking about the bail judgement in favor of JS ? Or perhaps you were talking about this ??
http://sankaracharyaarticles.blogspot.com/...p-with-sit.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->ollowing this, the Judge got angry and asked:
"If the police want to get information from a person they can go to that person and question him.Without having done that, how can you send summons to him?
The prosecutor must inform the special investigation team not to focus on other matters straying from the main investigation. Any such actions of theirs will become legally invalid .
A thought arises in my mind whether to send this kind of cases related to Sankaramutt to another judge. Because there is a possibility at a later date for a complaint that I do not give statements favourable to the Government in the Sankaramatam related cases,"said the [Honorable] Justice.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Re IC group dig here..
Hey man, we are talking about the day the seer got arrested - you sure it was before or after ? Happens, happens, dreams are like that onlee.. <!--emo&

I am talking about a hundred years of Indian jurisprudence. I am talking about 'Majumder on Evidence' - standard text in courts and chambers in the Commanwealth. But what would you know about these?
They way I see it, the judges were right on bail. No qualms here.
Wait till the trial for the rest. I will nail you, or you me!
I have been kind here - trust me. Next time I wont.
Pathma