Nexus Between Entities Influencing India

[Husky]

And found this too, by one "Gautam Sen". That name sounds familiar... (Then again, every name sounds familiar these days.)



Better to read at the link where important statements have been highlighted by either the author or the site's editor:



indiafacts.co.in/stopping-modi-at-all-costs

Stopping Modi at all costs

Posted by Gautam Sen / December 30, 2013 / Posted in Commentary, Headline / 41 Comments



[color="#0000FF"]A US decision has evidently reaffirmed that Narendra Modi cannot be allowed to become prime minister of India.[/color] This is similar to the verdict reached on the elected President of Egypt, Mohammed Morsi. The US simply did not trust him and the Muslim Brotherhood to keep their promises of good behaviour. It seems the conclusion was that Morsi had to be removed from power despite his firm crackdown on the interests of the Hamas in Egypt and emollient tone about other issues of concern to the US.



The Saudis had also weighed in because the Muslim Brotherhood has historically laid claim to leadership of the Islamic world. This was an intolerable threat to US influence over what has been State Department Islam, the best antidote to Arab nationalism and underpinning for anti-communism, in the context of the Cold War, through a supine Saudi monarchy, totally dependent on the US for survival. The US was also possibly aware of everything Morsi was saying in private through its comprehensive eavesdropping activities that leave little confidential. It is probable that Morsi was counselling his Muslim Brotherhood associates of the need to bide their time.



Narendra Modi’s case is not fundamentally different because it is feared that Modi and his supporters will curtail the huge incursions into India by US agencies the UPA has facilitated. It is assumed that once Modi forms the government and becomes aware that India’s is well on the way to becoming a US banana republic satellite–in the age-old Central American and Asian tradition, subject to indirect rule–he will move to end it. The US has evidently infiltrated India on a massive scale, blackmailing politicians with covertly acquired information, sponsoring countless secular and religious foundations and the purchase of a huge swathe of the Indian media.



However, the erstwhile BJP as such was not really a drawback for the US because some of its prominent leaders have been very close to the US, virtual spokesmen for it. Others bent over backwards during the tenure of the NDA to please. Two of the BJP’s most senior decision makers, including the late Brajesh Mishra, even made offers of sending Indian troops to join the coalition in Afghanistan. The Americans themselves had not made such a request to India because it would have sent their vital ally in the Afghan war into veritable frenzy. This idea was very wisely vetoed personally by Atal Behari Vajpayee himself!



The Muslim Brotherhood is now facing savage repression, with the US-backed Egyptian military embarked on a reign of terror. It has not hesitated to kill hundreds of civilian Muslim Brotherhood demonstrators, including many women, by the simple expedient of shooting them while they slept. It is also systematically decapitating the Muslim Brotherhood political leadership. The Egyptian military has effectively re-imposed a dictatorship that is a prelude to shepherding its own pliant creatures into power, but through a process that assures an outward democratic fig leaf. The Muslim Brotherhood has been denounced as a terrorist organisation and cannot contest elections.



An even harsher version of this model for maintaining US control was tried out successfully in Algeria during the 1990s. The US and French sponsored Algerian military dispensation killed anything up to 300,000 civilians to eliminate the radical Islamic Salvation Group. The free Fourth Estate of Europe and the US played its usual collaborationist role. It blamed the army of the Islamic Salvation Group for the widespread killings, often of their own supporters, in orgies of mindless bloodlust, however incredible and unlikely that might appear. The bloody conflict lasted a decade and ended with the total destruction of the Islamic radicals. The Western intervention, which has destroyed much of Syria, killing more than 150,000 people, to the approving clamour of the Western human rights lobby, is another variant for re-imposing imperial control over a country. The invasion and destruction of Iraq was another, the death toll approximately 2 million so far.



The Indo-US nuclear accord has puzzled many observers, especially the mostly ill-informed Indian public. Some insiders involved in the negotiation of the Indo-US Nuclear Accord were also mystified by the US decision to allow India to ascend, in effect, to the extraordinary status of a bona fide nuclear power. Even more apparently inexplicable was the direct efforts made by President George Bush Jnr. himself to ensure a favourable outcome at the IAEA negotiations. He made a personal phone call to the President of China at a crucial juncture of the negotiations, when the latter embarked on a discreet, last-minute manoeuvre to scupper the deal it had agreed earlier with the US.



An excellent, revealing account of China’s machinations, by a senior Indian journalist present in Vienna was buried by his editor, the owner of India’s most pro-Chinese daily. In the end, the most knowledgeable attributed this paramount political American decision, recognising India as a nuclear power, to President Bush supposedly becoming enamoured with the country on a visit during the 1990s. It is unconvincing, indeed inconceivable that such a decision of huge political import could have been the product of a sentimental whim. Although it is possible Bush acquired an undue affection for India, however weird that might seem to even the most patriotic Indian.



The decision to accord India nuclear status occurred because of a US perception that it had finally managed to acquire a durable foothold in it and access to high level Indian decision-making during the tenure of the UPA. Indeed, it seems, the US was even able to determine appointments to the Union Cabinet, certainly in the case of the Commerce and the Environment portfolios and perhaps even the EAM’s selection is cleared now by the US ambassador in Delhi. The granting of nuclear status to India, which was well and truly an enormous gift was motivated by the US view of India as a new client satellite. The journey in this fateful direction began during the tenure of the NDA and has neared completion under a totally subverted UPA. To their credit, both Jawaharlal Nehru and India Gandhi had resisted this dire predicament during the first decades of Indian independence.



The UPA of course represents mainly the family, rather than India and is also deferential to the US, which is the fate of the family itself as well. Quite noticeably, the US has helpfully striven to conceal any embarrassing information on the likely UPA prime ministerial candidate. The purchase of untested Westinghouse nuclear reactors as quid pro quo for the Indo-US Accord was a less significant secondary understanding. One also begins to understand why the UPA became an agent WalMarts rather than representing the vital interests of millions of Indian retailers.



This does not mean India accedes to all US dictates, for example over the purchase of Iranian crude. However, a deeper subservience to US preferences has been established and is being institutionalised. The US has become the major shareholder in the equity of the GoI, much as it has been in Pakistan for decades.



Mohammed Morsi may have eventually brought its own divinely-sanctioned misfortune to Egypt, but his entrapment, after the preliminary honeyed effusions from Washington, is a lesson for Indians, themselves on the verge of losing control over their country. Morsi was never in full command of the Egyptian government and the affairs of the country, despite an overwhelming electoral mandate. The religious obsessions of the Muslim Brotherhood also constrained a calculated grasp of the harsh secular international realities lapping around them.



They were determined to achieve, in short order, some of their Shariah-ordained goals on personal conduct, especially pertaining to women’s dress codes and sexual behaviour, a central pillar in the history of Islam, imperial expansion apart. The desire to impose curbs on other supposedly un-Islamic liberal freedoms was also accorded high priority. Yet, he was never in full control of critical economic issues like food and petroleum prices, which rose inexorably. As a result, a myriad of voluntary organisations and media outlets, blatantly sponsored by the US, had tens of thousands of the religiously less observant on the streets, baying for his blood. Within days of his brutal overthrow prices and other shortages mitigated and the Saudis and Kuwaitis extended huge loans to the beleaguered Egyptian economy.



The virtually instant announcement, after the swearing-in of Arvind Kejriwal and his juvenile crew, following their inept, comic preening for the media, was a hunger-strike in Bhopal and the decision to contest elections in Gujarat. The goal of AAP is now blindingly obvious. The intention is to split the anti-Congress vote to prevent Modi and the BJP winning enough seats in 2014 to form a viable government. The other alternative outcome would be to reduce their number sufficiently to facilitate the barely-concealed claim of his implacable opponents inside the BJP to propose an alternative candidate for prime minister, ostensibly to help form a governing coalition. The Indian domestic political support for the AAP intervention is from the counterparts of the so-called young and liberal in Cairo’s Tahir Square. They are really all a product of India’s manipulative and manipulated English language media, much of it in hock to banks and foreign conglomerate owners.



How the AAP originated and their personal international ties are indeed a matter of interest, but not the only issue. The Magasaysay award is a known instrument for affording recognition to Asians sensitive to the US portrayal of the world. Volunteering to work for Mother Teresa is also an agreeable item on a CV, indicating desirable political impulses to Western governments. At the very least, the US has intervened in a dynamically unstable Indian polity to affect outcomes. Funding a useful political or voluntary local entity through an Indian business house is standard practice for foreign countries. They reimburse the business house by engaging with it in an unrelated profitable transaction. The Saudis regularly employ such business deals in India on behalf of Pakistan and the US does so as well in scores of countries. It offers complete anonymity and its legality hard to question.



[color="#0000FF"]The final solution to a difficult and high stakes political standoff will be to assassinate Narendra Modi. The attempt already made in Patna is almost certain to have had foreign participation and the background to it presents a truly shocking picture of high level local complicity. Attempts to assassinate Modi are likely to occur again. Determined efforts continue to incite Islamic radicals to make such an attempt, by funding endless court proceedings to ensure the accusations over the 2002 Gujarat riots remain alive.[/color]

[color="#800080"](US is famous for having key people offed and then using their famous "deniability" strategy: "Don't look at us, we had nothing to do with it/prove we did. We condole deeply. And we condemn <blablabla>" Sort of like christianism: "we apologise, we condemn, we commiserate", and: "of course we're not the ones funding and facilitating the jihad/in Kerala, Hindus and christians must be allies against islamic 'love jihad' together" etc.)[/color]



[color="#0000FF"]The logistical backup for any plan to murder Narendra Modi will likely originate in Pakistan, already rejoicing at the colossal damage to Indian intelligence the UPA attempt to curb him has inflicted. It is also extremely suspect that invitations to Narendra Modi to visit came from three close US allies, two of them with little compelling reason for extending them. The US itself persists in using the issue of his visa to cause him whatever negative publicity possible. Quite clearly, assassinating him abroad might have been considered more logistically feasible and less damaging politically than in India. The intention is to end the career of the most popular Indian politician since independence and one that threatens to assert it.[/color]



Dr Gautam Sen taught international political economy at the London School of Economics.

Poor Modi. I don't think he signed up to get murdered by US-appointed islamaniacs/christomaniacs/communits/hitmen.

Strange how history repeats. There were repeated christo attempts on emperor Julian's life too. Although Modi's primary (and perhaps sole) agenda is development and not reversion to heathenism of the nation.

Hopefully Modi will survive running the gauntlet and his would-be assassins will be assassinated instead (to christoislamania=US' chagrin) and christoislamia=US exposed to the world for the terrorist that it is.

(I notice that US is training its guns on Ukraine too/busy manufacturing consent surrounding the recent events in the Ukraine too.)



Some of the many comments to the above article:

Lucky January 1, 2014 12:35 am Reply

Current stand off between USA & India over Devyani is a hog-wash & drama to make sure that Indian government is protecting Indian interest. It is just an extension what author displayed in this article. If Modi comes into the power then USA will use this case to make Indian government life miserable. If other-than-Modi come to the helm of India then everything will be back to normal.



Ohm January 16, 2014 1:25 am Reply

You are very right. Infact the deyani issue too appears to be just a joint ploy to project upa govt as anti-us. This will help mask any real underhand trek the two are having in public eyes. By the time people realise it, it will be late.



vkjain January 1, 2014 8:47 pm Reply

US cannot compromise on any possibility or incident which may slightly affect its position of world emperor. All such threats like Lal Bahadur Shastri, Dr. Bhabha, Subhash Chandra Bose, Rajiv Dixit, etc. have faced ill-fate in the past. Every educated citizen of the country understands this fact and therefore is concerned and anxious about security and safety of Modi. He is the person who can change all the world equations within no time. Entire country is mad after him. He is so patriotic, honest, devoted and sincere to the nation that people are ready to do anything at his one call. Therefore, the country is bound to see the day in Modi Era.

On the matter of Doniger again (related to the previous post), I just noticed her pictures. Is she ugly. Wow - as in wow.

I think that explains her outpouring of sexual frustration and consequent projection. But there's something quite scary looking about her too, something really seedy about her looks. She looks almost familiar, but it's quite an uncomfortable feeling when I looked at her picture. I can't put my finger on it, but I feel like I've seen her face on TV before. :weird: Maybe it's just 'cause she looks like one of those many catholic nun types that famously sexually assaulted little boys or girls. Wait, I know where I've seen Doniger's face! It was on one of those "America's most wanted" type shows, I think. They were looking for a repeated child offender. OMGs that's her! That was Doniger! She was that paedophile they've been looking for! (Or else looks exactly like her.)



And that explains EVERYTHING. She has a Paedophile/America's Most Wanted face! And that's why all her ideological spawn ("Wendy's Children") exhibit the same type of behaviour that deviant adults/perverts exhibit who were themselves sexually assaulted by catholic priests in childhood! OMGs. I've like totally figured out why she and her spawn - like Jeffrey Kripal types was it? - work that way.



Wendy "The Paedophile" Doniger and her Paedophile Spawn!



Of course people can say I shouldn't libel, but you know, I've always believed in free speech and it's a valid interpretation of her and her kind after all:

1. She looks like a paedophile. (Be honest. But kids are so honest that if she had visited my NL high school as "professor", my class would have said to her face: "You're so ugly, you look like a paedophile, you freak! Keep away from us, you PAEDOPHILE". We had got quite a sixth sense about creepy adults. And Doniger's beyond creepy.)

2. She acts like a deviant: considering her writings are all about sexual perversions

3. Her ideological kindred/spawn/close associates all display the symptoms of abuses and carry on the cycle of abuse



Again: I like totally figured these people out. Maybe I should have studied psychoanalysis. I mean, these people are Psychos - with a capital P - and I like totally analysed them to a T. So I should get an A in psychoanalysis.



[color="#0000FF"]Someone should write the book "Wendy Doniger - An Alternative Portrait: the Portrait of a Paedophile on the loose". If she sues for libel and the book gets banned or even if were not to make money, people can go on a whinefest about how Doniger persecuted "freedom of speech".[/color]



And wow, I still can't get over how ugly she is. Now I can't even feel sorry for her despite her ugliness (the extent of it might have been pitiable in other cases) because she really does give off a paedophile vibe. :horrors: That's it, I may start referring to her as Wendy the Paedophile Doniger from now on.

It's okay right, IF? Freedom of speech and all? Just 'cause I can't prove she's not a paedophile doesn't mean it's not true. (Using Wendy type logic.)





Sorry, I got creeped out by Wendy "The Paedophile" Doniger and so got carried away. The actual but unrelated news was:



indiafacts.co.in/stopping-modi-at-all-costs

Stopping Modi at all costs

Posted by Gautam Sen / December 30, 2013 / Posted in Commentary, Headline / 41 Comments

[color="#0000FF"]A US decision has evidently reaffirmed that Narendra Modi cannot be allowed to become prime minister of India.[/color]



[...]



[color="#0000FF"]The logistical backup for any plan to murder Narendra Modi will likely originate in Pakistan, already rejoicing at the colossal damage to Indian intelligence the UPA attempt to curb him has inflicted. It is also extremely suspect that invitations to Narendra Modi to visit came from three close US allies, two of them with little compelling reason for extending them. The US itself persists in using the issue of his visa to cause him whatever negative publicity possible. Quite clearly, assassinating him abroad might have been considered more logistically feasible and less damaging politically than in India. The intention is to end the career of the most popular Indian politician since independence and one that threatens to assert it.[/color]

Rest at link.