Nexus Between Entities Influencing India

[Husky]

1. The following totally explains the concerted international reporting on the "poor" Rohingya "refugees". Their sobstory has been brought to a level with - and made to eclipse and oust - even the Yezidis being genocided by islam, though the Yezidis' plight never got such extensive coverage or so many soundbytes of condemnation from aliens.

Meanwhile, the Buddhists of Burma are projected as the next IS/Taliban for kicking out the Bangladeshi islamic miscreants "Rohingyas" to where they belong: in some islamic place (prefer they being kicked to the Middle-East than to Malaysia/Indonesia though).





bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/amnesty-international-appoints-modi-basher-as-its-executive-director-for-india-poonam-patil-kalra/

Amnesty International appoints Modi-basher as its executive director for India – Poonam Patil Kalra



“Amnesty International has been criticized often for its dubious funding, anti-national agenda and its alleged links with pro-jihadi groups. … It repeatedly released reports that sided with Islam in regards to Middle East politics. When Gita Sahgal resigned from Amnesty, she further warned, Islam is trying to whitewash its terrorist image by ‘buying’ organizations she thought were defenders of human rights, democracy and freedom.” – Poonam Patil Kalra



[...]

The organization has been criticized often for its dubious funding, anti-national agenda and its alleged links with pro-jihadi groups. The organization says on its website, “We neither seek nor accept any funds for human rights research from governments or political parties and we accept support only from businesses that have been carefully vetted. By way of ethical fundraising leading to donations from individuals, we are able to stand firm and unwavering in our defence of universal and indivisible human rights.”



Despite this claim, Amnesty did receive grants from the UK Department for International Development, the European Commission, the United States State Department and other governments. It is also funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.



Senior human rights activist, Gita Sahgal, who has worked with Amnesty for seven years for women’s’ rights, warns that Amnesty International is too closely linked to pro-jihadi groups. Sahgal spoke of Amnesty’s links with Moazzam Begg, a former inmate at Guantanamo Bay, and his organisation Cageprisoners. According to her, Islam, and in particular the Sharia law, treat women as second-hand citizens are not the worst sides of this religion. However, Amnesty International repeatedly released reports that sided with Islam in regards to Middle East politics. When Gita Sahgal resigned from Amnesty, she further warned, Islam is trying to whitewash its terrorist image by “buying” organizations she thought were defenders of human rights, democracy and freedom.



Recently, when the Indian government came down harshly on foreign funded NGOs, Amnesty put the following posters in Germany.



The hoarding says: “Threatened, Evicted, Robbed – India’s economy is growing with disadvantage for the indigenous population and poor parts of the society. Entire villages are being displaced to create room for industrial sites. People are forcibly evicted from their homes.“



This is a clear attempt by the organization to show the Indian government and its policies in poor light in front of the western populace. India and its progressing economy seems to be a threat to the NGO.



Amnesty International has been exposed in the past of ideological bias by many governments of non-Western countries, including those of, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the People’s Republic of China, Vietnam, and Russia who have shown Amnesty International for one-sided reporting or a failure to treat threats to security as a mitigating factor.



What’s the latest with Amnesty?



Well, it appoints Aakar Patel as its India head. Who is he? Aakar Patel is a jounalist who writes for several dailies including LiveMint and DNA. He specializes in creating vilifying and malicious write-ups especially against Modi. He is famous for making casteist comments, stereotyping people based on their ethnic backgrounds and anti Hindu rhetoric.



If there is Modi-hating company, Aakar Patel is the boss. Not only does he beat others, he betters himself with every new article, thus ascending to new summits of Modi-bashing and in turn plunging to newer depths of moronity. Here are some gems showcasing the twisted logic and Hindu-phobia that Aakar Patel proudly shows off :



[...]

Rest at link.





2. Added.

Swarajyamag was running an article by the "Hindu" AmriKKKan Foundation (HAF) on why Hindus in India should accept homosexuality as a *Hindu* societal norm - complete with the usual subversions of Hindoos' heathenism to force-read LGBT into Mohini-Vishnu+Shiva and Ardhanaareeshwara, to make their argument/lecture Hindus to "accept".



swarajyamag.com/culture/a-hindu-approach-to-lgbt-rights/



And apparently the Saptapadi rite has been subverted in the US - so not apaswaram in Vedic rites, they've rather "adapting" the saptapadi and rites to same-sex marriages and misapplying it to a wrong target couple configuration - and this is the sort of thing that HAF further feels should be the future of Hindu heathenism in India too.



Since when was this okay? Then again, stupid new age "Hindus" have been applying Vedic rites to aliens (incl "converts") marrying "Hindus" too. No wonder ethnically Indian LGBT feel the same self-entitlement. "What's good for the goose..."



But I disagree on both counts: Vedic rites should NOT be applied for alien-with-Hindu marriages NOR for ethnically-Indian gay marriages. People should stop messing with serious Hindu rites. Too late I suppose. NRI and other new age Hindoos have already cheapened their religion by selling it off to aliens ("converts" etc) to dabble in: the floodgate's already opened. What comes in hereafter asserts it has an equal claim now.



There are all kinds of annoying and extremely provoking highly ignorant comments in the comments section. E.g. by one LGBT/champion claiming that homosexuality is absolutely never a choice for anyone, when quite a number of lesbian feminists are on record for declaring it is a choice [definitely for them], duh. (E.g. independent.co.uk/life-style/is-sexual-orientation-a-choice-9582897.html) So who are they trying to kid shouting others down that it is Never a choice for Nobody? Feminism has actually bred a surprising number of lesbians from an otherwise straight population - to the extent that a Scandinavian film actually lampooned this trend - all because they were brainwashed into hating men.* It's amazing that no one but ex-straight feminist lesbians will discuss this. And so yes, there is a certain amount of learnt behaviour here. Though I fingerpoint radical feminism (but is there any another kind?)

* The way many self-labelled "dalits" have been brainwashed against their own ancestral heathenism.





And in the swarajyamag's comment section, there's also scary foreshadowing of more "rights" that LGBT want for themselves: one person declared that gay couples could consist of one person as a Vedic 'priest' or even as a 'gR^ihastha'** doing homas - so dabbling in the Vedam is another right they envision (or indulging in already, who knows) - and adopting kids too. <- It's the very same self-entitlement seen in alien dabblers/vedicists and alien adopters=abductors of ethnic children.



** Honestly. How is it when even unmarried Hindoo vedabrahmanas (straight and ethnic Hindoo obviously) aren't allowed to do certain Vedic rites, that gay Indics suddenly imagine they have a right to dabble in the same? The yajamAna-patnI is a female, and upon being married to the Yajamana, the latter is then empowered to do such rites and the wife does some specific things here and there to. The Hindoo vedabrahmana is not allowed access to such rites before. (Even I know that much.)



And so of course gay people are not allowed to dabble either, no matter how ethnically Indian they are, or if they have brahmin ancestry, or if they got married to their love interest (complete with "adapted" saptapadi). No one cares. It's just the way it is.

(And gay people should not be allowed to marry the opposite gender just so they can thereby dabble in the Vedam either IMO: People should follow their nature AND stick to the rules as regards sacred heathen rites. Lots of vedabrahmanas have unfortunately not been able to get married and so can't do gR^ihastha rites. Being HindOOs who value their religion, they abide by its rules. It is only new-ageists and alien-minded for whom heathenism is cheap that would break rules just to satisfy their own sense of self-entitlement.)



People who pretend to be sympathetic to heathenism or who pretend to have a Hindu outlook need to respect the rules and stick to them. These are serious matters. Stop turning Hindoo heathenism into a new-ageism. Yet HAF is promoting such new-ageism with their advertising positively for the subverting of the Vedic marriage rites.

What next, advertising for reciting the Vedam in apaswaram? Or inviting or enabling mlechchas to dabble? Oh wait, Indians have already been doing that last.