2. A list that names the ideologies of the christo-islamics baiting Hindu heathenism:
storify.com/apravasi/getting-started
Hindu Haters Posing as Hindu?
(Lists Mihir Simon Sharma and some others.)
It was late even many years ago when this thread was created and some did not like outing the christianism and islam of the agents (carriers).
It is much later now, though more feel comfortable in exposing the christoislamania of the anti-"Indian" (anti-Hindoo) nexus at last.
But many of those who contributed to the above list repeatedly ask the question - in such a manner that it doesn't even seem purely rhetorical, but as if the questioners are not certain of the answer themselves - as to why christians would use cryptochristianism to attack Indian nationalism (their actual target is Hindoos' heathenism), such as by hiding their christianism behind a Hindu name.
The answer is simple: cryptochristianism is employed as a more efficient means to destroy a heathenism. It's aim is to prevent the heathens from identifying the attacker's christianism and thus attacking christianism in response.
And, to repeat, the real aim is - not Hindu nationalism/Hindutva (Indian nationalism) - but Hindoos' heathenism. Christians' treachery in colluding with the west in attacking and undermining India being treachery is well identified at the link. But some in the list seem to think the reason is nebulous?
The tendency for christian treachery against a heathen nation has not changed since the Roman empire. As Romans had observed (see for example historian Joseph McCabe documenting this from primary sources), the christians were always rooting for any enemy of the heathen Roman empire, and ready to welcome them *and* eager to collude to with them.
Of course, once Rome came under christian rule with goals of christianisation of the empire - and as it thus became increasingly christian - christians became more "nationalist", since their goals were now aligned with christianism.
Indian christians, especially such cryptochristian traitors (since their cryptochristianism is employed for the sake of christianism=christianisation) - no matter how secular they pretend to be - are in it for christianism alone. They work for the great mission/"Great Commission". They align with the christowest (and their brothers in monotheism) since their loyalties are to fellow christians and then fellow monotheists over heathens.
Christianism - unlike islam - is NOT after modern Indian nationalism. They know that it is eventually a great help in eroding heathenism (the primary offence). Even though nationalism itslf is resistant to conversion, it is not the primary offence (the primary offence goes against the biblical commandments againts polytheism and idolatry and anyone who pretends otherwise doesn't know christianism).
Indian nationalism is only offensive to christianism as it is deemed to empower heathens (who may then empower themselves, despite of nationalism itself having turned into a replacement religion in the long run. Who knows, heathenism may even re-heathenise nationalism - which is worse from the christian POV, since then it's back to square one) and such empowering of heathens may thereby create setbacks for or slow down christian successes (in conversion terms) in India. That makes nationalism offensive. The primary target is still and almost exclusively only heathens and heathenism. Can see this even in the near universal christian praise and championing of Amish Tripati's subversionist tripe against Hindoo heathenism (e.g. the reviews on IIRC flipkart that I noticed several years back for some book series then were almost exclusively by Indian christians, and all of course gave it 5 stars, declaring in amazing unanimity that Tripati's subversions were the true way in which Hindu Gods and religio *ought* to be presented: as mere mythology/fantasy, that can moreover be re-written at whim, and with merely deified characters of course: jeebusjehovallah being the one true gawd all else are false=devil or not gawds).
Again: Christianism - unlike islam - is NOT after modern Indian nationalism. It is primarily after heathenism - this being the majority religio of India - all else is secondary or only a threat when it slows down (or is perceived as intending to slow down) the christianisation agenda.
Cryptochristians indicate, by their very act of using crypto-identities to attack Hindus and Hindu heathensm with, and Indian nationalism by extension, that they're doing it for jeebusism, that they're very faithful christians, not remotely secular-leaning, but entirely christian (often catholic and working on the Vatican's agenda: the church has lots of hand-picked and appointed persons in India's media and NGOs and the "rights" industry, not to mention governance/judiciary, to attack Hindus with).
So the answer is that *of course* cryptochristians are traitors and would work with the christowest, as christians form an ummah too and their loyalty is only to this (it's called christendom, same as during the crusades). And their aims are to 1. dismantle heathenism and 2. preferrably replace it with christianism though the west knows that islam will replace any christianism in India (and the stupid growing Indian christian infestation has no clue that the christowest will totally abandon them to their fates at such a time. Or Indian christians choose to be self-deluded rather, since examples like E Timor already leave them with no uncertainties that the christowest will sacrifice the Indian christians=useful idiots for its own interests. <- Concerning which: It's not just Indian christians who will gang up with the west against the rest in India. When the christowest turns on Indian christians facing jihad, I too will be rooting for the christowest/jihad. Obviously).
A list that names the ideologies of the christo-islamics baiting Hindu heathenism:
storify.com/apravasi/getting-started
Hindu Haters Posing as Hindu?
storify.com/apravasi/getting-started
Hindu Haters Posing as Hindu?
(Lists Mihir Simon Sharma and some others.)
It was late even many years ago when this thread was created and some did not like outing the christianism and islam of the agents (carriers).
It is much later now, though more feel comfortable in exposing the christoislamania of the anti-"Indian" (anti-Hindoo) nexus at last.
But many of those who contributed to the above list repeatedly ask the question - in such a manner that it doesn't even seem purely rhetorical, but as if the questioners are not certain of the answer themselves - as to why christians would use cryptochristianism to attack Indian nationalism (their actual target is Hindoos' heathenism), such as by hiding their christianism behind a Hindu name.
The answer is simple: cryptochristianism is employed as a more efficient means to destroy a heathenism. It's aim is to prevent the heathens from identifying the attacker's christianism and thus attacking christianism in response.
And, to repeat, the real aim is - not Hindu nationalism/Hindutva (Indian nationalism) - but Hindoos' heathenism. Christians' treachery in colluding with the west in attacking and undermining India being treachery is well identified at the link. But some in the list seem to think the reason is nebulous?
The tendency for christian treachery against a heathen nation has not changed since the Roman empire. As Romans had observed (see for example historian Joseph McCabe documenting this from primary sources), the christians were always rooting for any enemy of the heathen Roman empire, and ready to welcome them *and* eager to collude to with them.
Of course, once Rome came under christian rule with goals of christianisation of the empire - and as it thus became increasingly christian - christians became more "nationalist", since their goals were now aligned with christianism.
Indian christians, especially such cryptochristian traitors (since their cryptochristianism is employed for the sake of christianism=christianisation) - no matter how secular they pretend to be - are in it for christianism alone. They work for the great mission/"Great Commission". They align with the christowest (and their brothers in monotheism) since their loyalties are to fellow christians and then fellow monotheists over heathens.
Christianism - unlike islam - is NOT after modern Indian nationalism. They know that it is eventually a great help in eroding heathenism (the primary offence). Even though nationalism itslf is resistant to conversion, it is not the primary offence (the primary offence goes against the biblical commandments againts polytheism and idolatry and anyone who pretends otherwise doesn't know christianism).
Indian nationalism is only offensive to christianism as it is deemed to empower heathens (who may then empower themselves, despite of nationalism itself having turned into a replacement religion in the long run. Who knows, heathenism may even re-heathenise nationalism - which is worse from the christian POV, since then it's back to square one) and such empowering of heathens may thereby create setbacks for or slow down christian successes (in conversion terms) in India. That makes nationalism offensive. The primary target is still and almost exclusively only heathens and heathenism. Can see this even in the near universal christian praise and championing of Amish Tripati's subversionist tripe against Hindoo heathenism (e.g. the reviews on IIRC flipkart that I noticed several years back for some book series then were almost exclusively by Indian christians, and all of course gave it 5 stars, declaring in amazing unanimity that Tripati's subversions were the true way in which Hindu Gods and religio *ought* to be presented: as mere mythology/fantasy, that can moreover be re-written at whim, and with merely deified characters of course: jeebusjehovallah being the one true gawd all else are false=devil or not gawds).
Again: Christianism - unlike islam - is NOT after modern Indian nationalism. It is primarily after heathenism - this being the majority religio of India - all else is secondary or only a threat when it slows down (or is perceived as intending to slow down) the christianisation agenda.
Cryptochristians indicate, by their very act of using crypto-identities to attack Hindus and Hindu heathensm with, and Indian nationalism by extension, that they're doing it for jeebusism, that they're very faithful christians, not remotely secular-leaning, but entirely christian (often catholic and working on the Vatican's agenda: the church has lots of hand-picked and appointed persons in India's media and NGOs and the "rights" industry, not to mention governance/judiciary, to attack Hindus with).
So the answer is that *of course* cryptochristians are traitors and would work with the christowest, as christians form an ummah too and their loyalty is only to this (it's called christendom, same as during the crusades). And their aims are to 1. dismantle heathenism and 2. preferrably replace it with christianism though the west knows that islam will replace any christianism in India (and the stupid growing Indian christian infestation has no clue that the christowest will totally abandon them to their fates at such a time. Or Indian christians choose to be self-deluded rather, since examples like E Timor already leave them with no uncertainties that the christowest will sacrifice the Indian christians=useful idiots for its own interests. <- Concerning which: It's not just Indian christians who will gang up with the west against the rest in India. When the christowest turns on Indian christians facing jihad, I too will be rooting for the christowest/jihad. Obviously).
A list that names the ideologies of the christo-islamics baiting Hindu heathenism:
storify.com/apravasi/getting-started
Hindu Haters Posing as Hindu?