Here, Shambhu.
More from the first chapter of <b>Durant's The Case For India</b>, the PDF of which is linked to in post 37 (my comment in purple):
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Instead of encouraging education, the Government encouraged drink. When the British came, India was a sober nation. "The temperance of the people," said Warren Hastings, "is demonstrated in the simplicity of their food and their total abstinence from spirituous liquors and other substances of intoxication.12O With the first tradingposts established by the British, saloons were opened for the sale of rum, and the East India Company made handsome profits from the trade.121 When the Crown took over India it depended on the saloons for a large part of its revenue; the license system was so arranged as to stimulate drinking and sales. The Government revenue from such licenses has increased seven-fold in the last forty years; in 1922 it stood at $60,000,000 annually- three times the appropriation for schools and universities.
Miss Mayo tells us that Hindu mothers feed opium to their children; and she concludes that India is not fit for Home Rule. What she says is true; what she does not say makes what she says worse than a straightforward lie. She does not tell us (though she must have known) that women drug their children because the mothers must abandon them every day to go to work in the factories. She does not tell us that the opium is grown only by the Government, and is sold exclusively by the Government; that its sale, like the sale of drink through saloons, is carried on despite the protests of the Nationalist Congress, the Industrial and Social Conferences, the Provincial Conferences, the Brahmo-Somaj, the Arya-Somaj, the Mohammedans and the Christians; that there are seven thousand opium shops in India, operated by the British Government, in the most conspicuous places in every town ;122that the Central Legislature in 1921 passed a bill prohibiting the growth or sale of opium in India, and that the Government refused to act upon it ;123 that from two to four hundred thousand acres of India's soil, sorely needed for the raising of food, are given over to the growing of opium 124 and that the sale of the drug brings to the Government one-ninth of its total revenue every year.125She does not tell us that Burma excluded opium by law until the British came, and is now overrun with it; that the British distributed it free in Burma to create a demand for it ;126that whereas the traffic has been stopped in the Philippines, England has refused,at one WorId Opium Conference after another, to abandon it in India; that though she has agreed to ,reduce the export of opium by 10% yearly, she has refused to reduce its sale in India; that the Report of the Government Retrenchment Commission of 1925 emphasized "the importance of safeguarding opium sales as an important source of revenue," and recommended "no further reduction" ;127that when Gandhi by a peaceful antiopium campaign in Assam had reduced the consumption of the drug there by one-half, the Government put a stop to his labors and jailed forty-four of his aides.128She does not tell us that the health, courage and character of the Hindu people have been undermined through this ruthless drugging of a nation by men pretending to be Christians. (They are very much christians, just like the christians who settled in Australia have got the Aboriginals addicted to liquor, while the holy christian settlers of America got the native Americans addicted to liquor and gambling. It is The Christian Way. Perhaps Dinesh d'Souza should consider becoming an opium addict himself as a final proof of his love for colonialism which he's given not one but two cheers to. The loser.)
On July 10, 1833, Lord Macaulay addressed the House of Commons as follows:
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->It was. . . the practice of the miserable tyrants whom we found in India, that when they dreaded the capacity and spirit of some distinguished subject, and yet could not venture to murder him, to administer to him a daily dose of the pousta, a preparation of opium, the effect of which was in a few
months to destroy all the bodily and mental powers of the wretch who was drugged with it, and turn him into a helpless idiot. That detestable artifice, more horrible than assassination itself, was worthy of those who employed it. It is no model for the English nation. We shall never consent to administer the pousta to a whole community, to stupefy and paralyze a great people.129<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->These words were spoken almost a century ago.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Oh pooh, Macaulay can sermonise all he wants that "it is not worthy..., no model for the English..., [who] shall never consent to administer it to a whole community" - yet it is <i>precisely</i> what the christoterrorists from Britain did. So he can stop pretending. Not 'can', but past-tense. The macauliflower is a rotting corpse now, waiting for his not-coming judgment day or whatever.
"Praise christianity, the religion of lies, terrorism, drugging people and getting them addicted to drink. Oh, and the religion of pedophilia."
Said lord macauliflower "It was. . . the practice of the miserable tyrants whom we found in India (to drug enemies)". Christoliar. But, though they have a habit of pre-emptively blaming everyone else so that no one should suspect them, we know which miserable tyrants <i>did</i> do this to millions upon millions: the christotyrants.
The christian terrorism with liquor and more bad christian influence was noted by Aurobindo:
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/ir/IR_part1.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->March 31, 1908
??????? The increasing poverty of the masses has been the subject of innumerable pamphlets, speeches and newspaper articles, but we are apt to think our duty done when we have proved that the poverty problem is there; we leave the solution to the future and forget that by the time the solution comes, the masses will have sunk into a condition of decay from which it will take the nation many decades to recover. We have been accustomed to deal only with the economical side of this poverty, but there is a moral side which is even more important. The Indian peasantry have always been distinguished from the less civilised masses of Europe by their superior piety, gentleness, sobriety, purity, thrift and native intelligence. They are now being brutalised by unexampled oppression;[9] attracted to the liquor shops which a benevolent Government liberally supplies, bestialised by the example of an increasingly immoral aristocracy and gradually driven to the same habits of looseness and brutality which disgrace the European proletariats. This degeneration is proceeding with an alarming rapidity. In some parts of the country it has gone so far that recovery seems impossible.... We have heard of villages where the liquor shop and the prostitute, institutions unknown twenty-five years ago, have now the mastery of the poorest villagers. Many of the villages in West Bengal are now well supplied with these essentials of Western civilisation.... These conditions of the worst districts tend to become general and unless something is done to stem the tide of evil, it will sweep away the soul of India in its turbid current and leave only a shapeless monstrosity of all that is worst in human nature.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Like the dowry and casta system, drugs and reckless alcoholism are due to christoterrorism introduced by the British in India, just as how christoterrorists had introduced it amongst N America's native Americans and Australian Aboriginals.
Everyday I see more proof of the holiness of christoterrorism. Really, it is a mystery as to why the Hindoos don't convert to the True Faith of christianism in larger numbers. But I'm sure when they learn about all this they will open their eyes and willingly enter into the 'salvation' (by opium and alcoholism) of the non-existent jeebus and his terrorism called christianism. No? I mean, that's the best reason for conversion it's offered so far (after the non-existence of jeebus)...
More from the first chapter of <b>Durant's The Case For India</b>, the PDF of which is linked to in post 37 (my comment in purple):
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Instead of encouraging education, the Government encouraged drink. When the British came, India was a sober nation. "The temperance of the people," said Warren Hastings, "is demonstrated in the simplicity of their food and their total abstinence from spirituous liquors and other substances of intoxication.12O With the first tradingposts established by the British, saloons were opened for the sale of rum, and the East India Company made handsome profits from the trade.121 When the Crown took over India it depended on the saloons for a large part of its revenue; the license system was so arranged as to stimulate drinking and sales. The Government revenue from such licenses has increased seven-fold in the last forty years; in 1922 it stood at $60,000,000 annually- three times the appropriation for schools and universities.
Miss Mayo tells us that Hindu mothers feed opium to their children; and she concludes that India is not fit for Home Rule. What she says is true; what she does not say makes what she says worse than a straightforward lie. She does not tell us (though she must have known) that women drug their children because the mothers must abandon them every day to go to work in the factories. She does not tell us that the opium is grown only by the Government, and is sold exclusively by the Government; that its sale, like the sale of drink through saloons, is carried on despite the protests of the Nationalist Congress, the Industrial and Social Conferences, the Provincial Conferences, the Brahmo-Somaj, the Arya-Somaj, the Mohammedans and the Christians; that there are seven thousand opium shops in India, operated by the British Government, in the most conspicuous places in every town ;122that the Central Legislature in 1921 passed a bill prohibiting the growth or sale of opium in India, and that the Government refused to act upon it ;123 that from two to four hundred thousand acres of India's soil, sorely needed for the raising of food, are given over to the growing of opium 124 and that the sale of the drug brings to the Government one-ninth of its total revenue every year.125She does not tell us that Burma excluded opium by law until the British came, and is now overrun with it; that the British distributed it free in Burma to create a demand for it ;126that whereas the traffic has been stopped in the Philippines, England has refused,at one WorId Opium Conference after another, to abandon it in India; that though she has agreed to ,reduce the export of opium by 10% yearly, she has refused to reduce its sale in India; that the Report of the Government Retrenchment Commission of 1925 emphasized "the importance of safeguarding opium sales as an important source of revenue," and recommended "no further reduction" ;127that when Gandhi by a peaceful antiopium campaign in Assam had reduced the consumption of the drug there by one-half, the Government put a stop to his labors and jailed forty-four of his aides.128She does not tell us that the health, courage and character of the Hindu people have been undermined through this ruthless drugging of a nation by men pretending to be Christians. (They are very much christians, just like the christians who settled in Australia have got the Aboriginals addicted to liquor, while the holy christian settlers of America got the native Americans addicted to liquor and gambling. It is The Christian Way. Perhaps Dinesh d'Souza should consider becoming an opium addict himself as a final proof of his love for colonialism which he's given not one but two cheers to. The loser.)
On July 10, 1833, Lord Macaulay addressed the House of Commons as follows:
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->It was. . . the practice of the miserable tyrants whom we found in India, that when they dreaded the capacity and spirit of some distinguished subject, and yet could not venture to murder him, to administer to him a daily dose of the pousta, a preparation of opium, the effect of which was in a few
months to destroy all the bodily and mental powers of the wretch who was drugged with it, and turn him into a helpless idiot. That detestable artifice, more horrible than assassination itself, was worthy of those who employed it. It is no model for the English nation. We shall never consent to administer the pousta to a whole community, to stupefy and paralyze a great people.129<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->These words were spoken almost a century ago.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Oh pooh, Macaulay can sermonise all he wants that "it is not worthy..., no model for the English..., [who] shall never consent to administer it to a whole community" - yet it is <i>precisely</i> what the christoterrorists from Britain did. So he can stop pretending. Not 'can', but past-tense. The macauliflower is a rotting corpse now, waiting for his not-coming judgment day or whatever.
"Praise christianity, the religion of lies, terrorism, drugging people and getting them addicted to drink. Oh, and the religion of pedophilia."
Said lord macauliflower "It was. . . the practice of the miserable tyrants whom we found in India (to drug enemies)". Christoliar. But, though they have a habit of pre-emptively blaming everyone else so that no one should suspect them, we know which miserable tyrants <i>did</i> do this to millions upon millions: the christotyrants.
The christian terrorism with liquor and more bad christian influence was noted by Aurobindo:
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/ir/IR_part1.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->March 31, 1908
??????? The increasing poverty of the masses has been the subject of innumerable pamphlets, speeches and newspaper articles, but we are apt to think our duty done when we have proved that the poverty problem is there; we leave the solution to the future and forget that by the time the solution comes, the masses will have sunk into a condition of decay from which it will take the nation many decades to recover. We have been accustomed to deal only with the economical side of this poverty, but there is a moral side which is even more important. The Indian peasantry have always been distinguished from the less civilised masses of Europe by their superior piety, gentleness, sobriety, purity, thrift and native intelligence. They are now being brutalised by unexampled oppression;[9] attracted to the liquor shops which a benevolent Government liberally supplies, bestialised by the example of an increasingly immoral aristocracy and gradually driven to the same habits of looseness and brutality which disgrace the European proletariats. This degeneration is proceeding with an alarming rapidity. In some parts of the country it has gone so far that recovery seems impossible.... We have heard of villages where the liquor shop and the prostitute, institutions unknown twenty-five years ago, have now the mastery of the poorest villagers. Many of the villages in West Bengal are now well supplied with these essentials of Western civilisation.... These conditions of the worst districts tend to become general and unless something is done to stem the tide of evil, it will sweep away the soul of India in its turbid current and leave only a shapeless monstrosity of all that is worst in human nature.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Like the dowry and casta system, drugs and reckless alcoholism are due to christoterrorism introduced by the British in India, just as how christoterrorists had introduced it amongst N America's native Americans and Australian Aboriginals.
Everyday I see more proof of the holiness of christoterrorism. Really, it is a mystery as to why the Hindoos don't convert to the True Faith of christianism in larger numbers. But I'm sure when they learn about all this they will open their eyes and willingly enter into the 'salvation' (by opium and alcoholism) of the non-existent jeebus and his terrorism called christianism. No? I mean, that's the best reason for conversion it's offered so far (after the non-existence of jeebus)...