09-26-2007, 01:28 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->mountainman
May 7, 2006, 10:32 PM
Atwill specifically promotes a fabricated Jesus.
This serves to make distinct the separateness of claims
in the theory space reserved to FJ theories. Such theories
specifically promote a fiction or a fabrication of the Galilaeans
to which literature an historical author is sought.
FJ may be new to the world as far as most people are concerned
but it is for any reasonable person to judge that the antiquity of
the FJ class of theories (of history) takes precedent with the
author ... emperor Julian c.362 CE.
In fact, it is my thesis that there is an earlier priority date.
I am confident that there will come a time in the history of
this planet when the words of Arius will commonly be
associated with the words of someone who subscribes to
a FJ theory, but who out of self-preservation sought out
clever disputations of the Constantinian inititiative, by which
he could call the fabrication of the Galilaeans
a fiction of men composed by wickedness and yet live.
As if the FJ theory was ever ever new or strange!!!
"What pride! What conceit" exclaims Basil. !!!!!
Best wishes one and all,
Pete Brown
NAMASTE
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
May 7, 2006, 10:32 PM
Atwill specifically promotes a fabricated Jesus.
This serves to make distinct the separateness of claims
in the theory space reserved to FJ theories. Such theories
specifically promote a fiction or a fabrication of the Galilaeans
to which literature an historical author is sought.
FJ may be new to the world as far as most people are concerned
but it is for any reasonable person to judge that the antiquity of
the FJ class of theories (of history) takes precedent with the
author ... emperor Julian c.362 CE.
In fact, it is my thesis that there is an earlier priority date.
I am confident that there will come a time in the history of
this planet when the words of Arius will commonly be
associated with the words of someone who subscribes to
a FJ theory, but who out of self-preservation sought out
clever disputations of the Constantinian inititiative, by which
he could call the fabrication of the Galilaeans
a fiction of men composed by wickedness and yet live.
As if the FJ theory was ever ever new or strange!!!
"What pride! What conceit" exclaims Basil. !!!!!
Best wishes one and all,
Pete Brown
NAMASTE
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->