Once again, two more reports from the Netherlands. The first is relevant to India.
Extent of global j-hadi network: Maroccan islamists who became terrorist-sidekicks in Kashmir are manufactured in a Dutch mosque.
http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/nederland/ar...3755/index.html for the original.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>State-endangering imam is allowed to stay after all</b>
Thursday 2 November 2006
Imam Eisha Bersham of Einhoven's Al Fourkaan-mosque may remain in the Netherlands after all, even if he propagates radical islam and the AIVD (Dutch Intelligence and Security Services) classifies him as a danger to the state.
That is what the court in Amsterdam has decided on Thursday. With that, the court chairman [?] W.J. van Bennekom destroyed the decision of the minister for Foreigner Affairs and Integration Rita Verdonk (VVD), who wanted to expel the man as unwanted/undesirable alien.
The extremist imam, a Bosnian [I think this is an error, he is a Sudanese, see below], gave religious leadership to a mosque where in any case<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'> several young Maroccans subsequently radicalised so that in 2002 they reported at the border with Kashmir to fight along with the islamic rebels there. The two were shot dead by the Indian border-patrol.</span>
<b>Nourishing soil</b>
The mosque has then also been the '(nourishing) soil' for the 'jihad', so concluded the AIVD, which poses that the Sudanese imam is a danger to national security. Investigation and findings of the intelligence services are secret, but the court did get a look into the pieces/evidence.
Even the the mosque had been known for years as a hot-bed of muslim extremism and terror plans, according to the court it has been insufficiently shown that the active imam was actively involved in the radicalising of the muslim youth in his mosque.
In the judgement, the court also expressed harsh criticism of Verdonk. The minister may not just expel foreigners, just because they are marked as dangerous-to-the-state by the AIVD. The court is also asking itself out loud whether declaring-as-undesirable is not a too heavy measure when it concerns the protection of national security.
(Dhimmi court. What's national security, right?)
By Bas Benneker<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->See also Post 264 of previous Islamism thread for more on this psycho imam.
http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/nederland/ar...1405/index.html has the original
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>More informal marriages muslim extremists</b>
Wednesday 20 December 2006
Radicalising muslim youths in the Netherlands are increasingly more often making use of informal weddings, whereby very young converted girls come under the influence of muslim extremist networks.
That's what minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin (CDA, Justice) and minister Johan Remkes (VVD, Internal Affairs) write in the fifth Progress Report Terrorism-combat (pdf) that they have sent to the House of Commons/Representatives on Wednesday.
<b>Substantial</b>
The influence of the extremist islamic stream of salafism is increasing, so write the ministers, and the radicalisation of muslim youths is also going steadily further. With so-called living-room weddings, male muslim extremists bind very young converts to themselves. They too radicalise themselves, even if the marriages don't last long.
The threat-level for attacks of islamic terrorists on Dutch soil remains 'substantial'. There is, it is true, no concrete indications of an attack, but internationally, The Netherlands has sharpened its profile amongst muslim extremists.
The report refers to the media-reporting of supposed 'torture practises' of Dutch soldiers in Iraq, the presence in Afghanistan, and the international fuss about the proposed burqaban.
By Bas Benneker<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> Post 262 of the previous Islamism thread has more on these wacky Dutch islamoterrorist weddings.
Extent of global j-hadi network: Maroccan islamists who became terrorist-sidekicks in Kashmir are manufactured in a Dutch mosque.
http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/nederland/ar...3755/index.html for the original.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>State-endangering imam is allowed to stay after all</b>
Thursday 2 November 2006
Imam Eisha Bersham of Einhoven's Al Fourkaan-mosque may remain in the Netherlands after all, even if he propagates radical islam and the AIVD (Dutch Intelligence and Security Services) classifies him as a danger to the state.
That is what the court in Amsterdam has decided on Thursday. With that, the court chairman [?] W.J. van Bennekom destroyed the decision of the minister for Foreigner Affairs and Integration Rita Verdonk (VVD), who wanted to expel the man as unwanted/undesirable alien.
The extremist imam, a Bosnian [I think this is an error, he is a Sudanese, see below], gave religious leadership to a mosque where in any case<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'> several young Maroccans subsequently radicalised so that in 2002 they reported at the border with Kashmir to fight along with the islamic rebels there. The two were shot dead by the Indian border-patrol.</span>
<b>Nourishing soil</b>
The mosque has then also been the '(nourishing) soil' for the 'jihad', so concluded the AIVD, which poses that the Sudanese imam is a danger to national security. Investigation and findings of the intelligence services are secret, but the court did get a look into the pieces/evidence.
Even the the mosque had been known for years as a hot-bed of muslim extremism and terror plans, according to the court it has been insufficiently shown that the active imam was actively involved in the radicalising of the muslim youth in his mosque.
In the judgement, the court also expressed harsh criticism of Verdonk. The minister may not just expel foreigners, just because they are marked as dangerous-to-the-state by the AIVD. The court is also asking itself out loud whether declaring-as-undesirable is not a too heavy measure when it concerns the protection of national security.
(Dhimmi court. What's national security, right?)
By Bas Benneker<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->See also Post 264 of previous Islamism thread for more on this psycho imam.
http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/nederland/ar...1405/index.html has the original
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>More informal marriages muslim extremists</b>
Wednesday 20 December 2006
Radicalising muslim youths in the Netherlands are increasingly more often making use of informal weddings, whereby very young converted girls come under the influence of muslim extremist networks.
That's what minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin (CDA, Justice) and minister Johan Remkes (VVD, Internal Affairs) write in the fifth Progress Report Terrorism-combat (pdf) that they have sent to the House of Commons/Representatives on Wednesday.
<b>Substantial</b>
The influence of the extremist islamic stream of salafism is increasing, so write the ministers, and the radicalisation of muslim youths is also going steadily further. With so-called living-room weddings, male muslim extremists bind very young converts to themselves. They too radicalise themselves, even if the marriages don't last long.
The threat-level for attacks of islamic terrorists on Dutch soil remains 'substantial'. There is, it is true, no concrete indications of an attack, but internationally, The Netherlands has sharpened its profile amongst muslim extremists.
The report refers to the media-reporting of supposed 'torture practises' of Dutch soldiers in Iraq, the presence in Afghanistan, and the international fuss about the proposed burqaban.
By Bas Benneker<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> Post 262 of the previous Islamism thread has more on these wacky Dutch islamoterrorist weddings.