10-09-2007, 07:11 AM
This post deals with what promotes secondary radicalization.
I view radicalization as primary and secondary.
Primary radicals are those that actively kill for an ideology or aid the killers by providing them with arms, shelter, food etc. The Koran/Hadiths/Mullahs generate primary radicals.
Secondary radicals are those that would never dream of becoming primary radicals themselves, but are engaged in keeping up their special status lifestyle.
Currently, as a result of various factors (Cultural destruction by muslim invaders/rulers, Jaichandism, generationally ingrained dhimmitude, designs of Christians like Lord Macaulay --it is highly improbable he would have done what he has if he was a British non-Christian--, Chinese influence, Nehru-Gandhi spinelessness and so on) a situation prevails in India whereby minorities are given special status. One can see this in reservations, in praising Islam / Christianity, in whitewashing their religion' inhumaneness, in suppressing evidence of their religions' inhumaneness, and so on). And Hindus are put down at every turn. Their religion is ridiculed in every which way. Gross liberties are taken with anything Hindu without batting an eyelid. NOthinh Hinhu is sacred, and if it is deemed sacred, it is only because it is politically expedient to consider it sacred.
The result of all this minority-pampering has been that minorities will do anything to preserve their special status. A muslim may drink Jim Beam at home, and not be averse to pork on the side (not that he has to do any such things, Islam allows him enough latitude to indulge himself *within* the bounds of the religion)--but, he will fight to be called a muslim. He will deny that Hindus are being oppressed by the government, though he very plainly sees it, and very much acknowledges it in his own mind. He dent that, say, the Taj Mahal was a Hindu structure, even when shown Shah Jahan's own admission that he had captured it and then "renovated" with Koranic inscriptions.
Why?
Because he, the muslim, does not want the majority to wake up.
That is his worst nightmare.
Once the majority wakes up, his special statues slowly gets taken from him, one entitlement at a time.
Therefore, anyone --Hindu, ex-Muslim, ex-Christian, Indophile-- who wants to educate Indians about the true story of India is a "Hindutavadi","Fascist" and what have you.
I have written about muslims, but all this applies to Christians as well.
I view radicalization as primary and secondary.
Primary radicals are those that actively kill for an ideology or aid the killers by providing them with arms, shelter, food etc. The Koran/Hadiths/Mullahs generate primary radicals.
Secondary radicals are those that would never dream of becoming primary radicals themselves, but are engaged in keeping up their special status lifestyle.
Currently, as a result of various factors (Cultural destruction by muslim invaders/rulers, Jaichandism, generationally ingrained dhimmitude, designs of Christians like Lord Macaulay --it is highly improbable he would have done what he has if he was a British non-Christian--, Chinese influence, Nehru-Gandhi spinelessness and so on) a situation prevails in India whereby minorities are given special status. One can see this in reservations, in praising Islam / Christianity, in whitewashing their religion' inhumaneness, in suppressing evidence of their religions' inhumaneness, and so on). And Hindus are put down at every turn. Their religion is ridiculed in every which way. Gross liberties are taken with anything Hindu without batting an eyelid. NOthinh Hinhu is sacred, and if it is deemed sacred, it is only because it is politically expedient to consider it sacred.
The result of all this minority-pampering has been that minorities will do anything to preserve their special status. A muslim may drink Jim Beam at home, and not be averse to pork on the side (not that he has to do any such things, Islam allows him enough latitude to indulge himself *within* the bounds of the religion)--but, he will fight to be called a muslim. He will deny that Hindus are being oppressed by the government, though he very plainly sees it, and very much acknowledges it in his own mind. He dent that, say, the Taj Mahal was a Hindu structure, even when shown Shah Jahan's own admission that he had captured it and then "renovated" with Koranic inscriptions.
Why?
Because he, the muslim, does not want the majority to wake up.
That is his worst nightmare.
Once the majority wakes up, his special statues slowly gets taken from him, one entitlement at a time.
Therefore, anyone --Hindu, ex-Muslim, ex-Christian, Indophile-- who wants to educate Indians about the true story of India is a "Hindutavadi","Fascist" and what have you.
I have written about muslims, but all this applies to Christians as well.