12-04-2005, 11:44 PM
Kaushal
It is these western churches who have made this concept as a fundamental right. It is for us to challenge it. Will that actually make proselytisation illegal ? I dont think so. But the idea where a person is wedded exclusively wedded to ONE religion at a given time leading to huuge wars etc has to be publicly denounced with good arguments like SS does. This will have a tilt, and will result in some practical measures if done effectively. While we can definitely explore proselytisation, there is a HUGE asymmetry of power, of discourse etc so essentially we will just be doing catching up.. Catching up in terms defined by the other players as in AMD against Intel.
It is these western churches who have made this concept as a fundamental right. It is for us to challenge it. Will that actually make proselytisation illegal ? I dont think so. But the idea where a person is wedded exclusively wedded to ONE religion at a given time leading to huuge wars etc has to be publicly denounced with good arguments like SS does. This will have a tilt, and will result in some practical measures if done effectively. While we can definitely explore proselytisation, there is a HUGE asymmetry of power, of discourse etc so essentially we will just be doing catching up.. Catching up in terms defined by the other players as in AMD against Intel.