1) To continue to receive funding from various government and environmental lobby sources. They even sent out emails telling everyone when funding was coming in and where from so that they could line up at the trough. Itâs all about the money, and the money right now is for making Global Warming real, even though it most clearly isnât.
2) To continue to back up the IPCCâs false claims of Global Warming in order to pass such Global Treaties as the Copenhagen treaty. Fortunately for the people of the world, it will absolutely fail this December. It was marked for failure before these emails were made public. Now itâs just that much more certain.
3) Numerous governments across Europe have enacted Cap and Trade schemes that have cost billions in lost GDP to nations like France and Great Britain. The scope of what has been quite literally robbed from the people of those nations is staggering â in the range of hundreds of billions of dollars. The economy of Great Britain is in shambles, and the people of those nations are suffering, their cost of living has gone up so fast that the poverty level has risen past the ability of their governments to write the welfare checks.
Their governments told them this was the best for climate, when in reality they were following pied pipers from the UN the IPCC and the East Anglica University and others who were all quite literally lying through their scientific degrees. All to justify a system of taxation that is nearly as bad as anything instituted during the middle ages â taking money from the people to fund the government class.
4) The entire point of the Copenhagen treaty was to use global cap and trade schemes to take money from 1st and 2nd world countries and give it to 3rd world nations as some sort of recompense for using Carbon, a naturally occurring element, as well as the single most common element on earth.
The single most amazing thing about this whole hoax is the numbers of people that actually bought into it. The amount of money that has been poured into this black hole of corruption is nothing short of astounding. Many people have known this and upon speaking out have been derided as nuts, deniers, ect. Well today is the day for all those who have been telling the truth to stand tall and bask in the glow of âI told you so.â The Global Warming Deniers were right all along. The IPCC data was not only wrong, but deliberately wrong.
The UN, the IPCC and all those who have been pushing this farce are borderline criminals bent upon robbing the American people along with the people of the world, all while lining their own pockets richly. Yes, that means you Al Gore and George Soros, both of whom have made hundreds of millions and an Academy Award off the scheme.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3635222/Th...Warming_Swindle
[This is a high-quality copy, of about a gigabyte in size. This link is the information about it, and you have to click the download link to get it on your BitTorrent client software. ]
<b>The Day Global Warming Stood Still</b><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Climate Change: As scientists confirm the earth has not warmed at all in the past decade, others wonder how this could be and what it means for Copenhagen. Maybe Al Gore can Photoshop something before December.
It will be a very cold winter of discontent for the warm-mongers. The climate show-and-tell in Copenhagen next month will be nothing more than a meaningless carbon-emitting jaunt, unable to decide just whom to blame or how to divvy up the profitable spoils of climate change hysteria.
hehe Al Gore is making bank swindling the millions of gullible morons.
In the 70s they had the overpopulation hysteria & Global Cooling believe it or not.
Henry Kissinger was an enthusiastic proponent of famines & the like to reduce population growth in developing countries as part of US foreign policy.
You can check back in Paul Ehrlich's books what he says about India back then.
"Paradoxically, 1968 also saw the genesis of an environmentalist dogma that was pessimistic about humanityâs capacity to feed itself. In that yearâwhen the global population growth rate peaked, at 2 percent per yearâPaul Ehrlich published The Population Bomb, intoning, âThe battle to feed all of humanity is over. ⦠Hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs.â The madding crowd of âstinking hotâ Delhi was odious to Ehrlich: âMy wife and daughter and I ⦠entered a crowded slum area. ⦠People, people, people, people. ⦠[We] were, frankly, frightened.â It was a âfantasy,â he said, that India would ever feed itself. Yet Borlaugâs program delivered such stunning results that India issued a 1968 stamp commemorating the âwheat revolution,â and by 1974 it was self-sufficient in all cereals.
[url="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8387737.stm"]Himalayan glaciers melting deadline 'a mistake'[/url]
Quote:The UN panel on climate change warning that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035 is wildly inaccurate, an academic says.
J Graham Cogley, a professor at Ontario Trent University, says he believes the UN authors got the date from an earlier report wrong by more than 300 years. <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
He is astonished they "misread 2350 as 2035". The authors deny the claims.
Leading glaciologists say the report has caused confusion and "a catalogue of errors in Himalayan glaciology".
The Himalayas hold the planet's largest body of ice outside the polar caps - an estimated 12,000 cubic kilometres of water.
They feed many of the world's great rivers - the Ganges, the Indus, the Brahmaputra - on which hundreds of millions of people depend
Since I'm sending this out to a wide range of people, I know that the level of knowledge on the 'climate change' issue will vary quite substantially, so I'll keep it short; which does take some of the fun out of it for me. <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> Many of you understand this issue very well, so I'm merely offering up Christopher Monckton's latest presentation; which is somewhat technical, but very entertaining if you've ever watched other presentations he has delivered. Lord Monckton is a British politician, business consultant, policy adviser, writer, columnist, and inventor. He served as an advisor to Margaret Thatcher's policy unit in the 1980s. I'm also encouraging you to sign his petition.
I've followed pretty closely the issue of anthropogenic global warming/climate change for the past three years. That's not a lot of time considering environmentalists started this nonsense in the mid-eighties, or even the seventies if you consider the past predictions of a pending ice age, but it's more than enough time to understand that this is a fraud perpetrated by a group of scientists, politicians and the media, with the unfortunate acquiescence of the naive and sympathetic public, that consider themselves liberals or progressives.
Here are two quotations that should tell you all you need to know about the fraud:
"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy."
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world."
- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment
Our government and certainly other governments connected with the UN and in line to receive our largess, do NOT CARE if this issue is real or not. They care about advancing their power and their ability to redistribute wealth; often called social and economic justice. Many influential persons on the left, to include George Soros and Madeleine Albright, believe that world peace will only come through economic and social parity amongst the nations of the world. That leaves you with two choices: you either raise the standard of living of all other countries; to include developing/3rd world nations, or you take from the most prosperous and productive countries and you transfer their wealth to the rest. If you understand leftist environmentalists, you know that they have ZERO interest in raising standards of living, because capitalism and prosperity are antithetical to their beliefs. Now you know which choice is the most viable in their minds, and Cap and Trade will not be pretty for the United States.
[url="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text"]Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak[/url]
Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations, sideline the UN's negotiating role and abandon the Kyoto protocol
Quote:The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.
[color="#FF0000"]The document also sets unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.[/color]
The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" ââ¬â but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark ââ¬â has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.
The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. T[color="#FF0000"]he draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol [/color]ââ¬â the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.
The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks".
A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:
[color="#FF0000"]ââ¬Â¢ Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;
ââ¬Â¢ Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called "the most vulnerable";
ââ¬Â¢ Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;
ââ¬Â¢ Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.[/color]
Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.
"It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process," said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.
Antonio Hill, climate policy adviser for[size="5"] Oxfam international[/size], said: "This is only a draft but it highlights the risk that when the big countries come together, the small ones get hurting. On every count the emission cuts need to be scaled up. It allows too many loopholes and does not suggest anything like the 40% cuts that science is saying
is needed."
This is second round of colonialism by Anglo-Saxons.
[url="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Obama-other-leaders-meet-apf-641973881.html?x=0"]Obama, other leaders meet again at climate summit[/url]
US again huddles with 18 other nations as Obama pushes progress at UN climate summit
Quote:COPENHAGEN (AP) -- President Barack Obama and world leaders are holding another impromptu meeting in search of a climate deal.
Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs said that Obama was meeting behind closed doors Friday with the leaders of Australia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan. Also participating in the talks were developing countries Ethiopia, Bangladesh and Colombia, among others.
China and Russia, both seen as key participants in the U.N. sponsored climate talks, also were present.
It was the second meeting of the day for the group.
Obama headed into the first meeting right after arriving in Copenhagen.[color="#FF0000"] Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao skipped the high-level meeting a second time and sent another envoy instead[/color].
[url="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/12/senior-white-house-official-the-chinese-are-dug-in-weve-done-what-we-can-in-copenhagen.html"]Senior White House Official: The 'Chinese Are Dug In'; 'We've Done What We Can' in Copenhagen[/url]
Quote:"We've done what we can here," a senior White House official in Copenhagen, Denmark, tells ABC News. "The Chinese are dug in on transparency and are refusing to let people know they're living up to their end of the agreement."
After landing in Denmark early this morning, President Obama met with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao during a bilateral at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen to press the case that China needs to allow for transparency.
"The President's priority is to make our economy far more focused on a clean energy economy that creates jobs," the official said. "He is here to work constructively and participate in hoping to get an international accord. But not getting one here won't change wanting to transform our economy to create the new foundation he's talked about."
The original goal of the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen was a legally binding international treaty reducing greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. It became clear months ago that at least partly because of the Chinese refusal to commit to serious greenhouse gas emission cuts, that would not happen.
[url="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30774.html"]Obama: 'Time for talk is over'[/url]
Quote:COPENHAGEN ââ¬â A visibly angry Barack Obama threw down the gauntlet at China and other developing nations Friday, declaring that the time has come "not to talk but to act" on climate change.
Emerging from a multinational meeting boycotted by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, Obama warned delegates that U.S. offers of funding for poor nations would remain on the table ââ¬Åif and only ifââ¬Â developing nations, including China, agreed to international monitoring of their greenhouse gas emissions.
"I have to be honest, as the world watches us ... I think our ability to take collective action is in doubt and it hangs in the balance,ââ¬Â Obama told the COP-15 plenary session as hope faded for anything more than a vague political agreement.
ââ¬ÅThe time for talk is over, this is the bottom line: We can embrace this accord, take a substantial step forward. We can do that, and everyone who is in this room will be part of an historic endeavor, or we can choose delay,ââ¬Â he said.
[url="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/18/obama-speech-copenhagen"]Barack Obama's speech disappoints and fuels frustration at Copenhagen[/url]
Quote:Responding to Obama's speech, a British official said: "Gordon Brown is committed to doing all he can and will stay until the very last minute to secure a deal... but others also need to show the same level of commitment. The prospects of a deal are not great."
Many reactions were strongly critical of Obama. Hugo Chávez, the president of Venezuela, described Obama's speech as "ridiculous" and the US's initial offer of a $10bn fund for poor countries in the draft text as "a joke".
Tim Jones, a spokesman for the World Development Movement, said: "The president said he came to act, but showed little evidence of doing so. He showed no awareness of the inequality and injustice of climate change. If America has really made its choice, it is a choice that condemns hundreds of millions of people to climate change disaster."
Friends of the Earth said in a statement, "Obama has deeply disappointed not only those listening to his speech at the UN talks, he has disappointed the whole world."
The World Wildlife Fund said Obama had let down the international community by failing to commit to pushing for action in Congress: "The only way the world can be sure the US is standing behind its commitments is for the president to clearly state that climate change will be his next top legislative priority."
The extent of crisis in the talks has taken leaders by surprise. The Brazilian leader, Lula da Silva, told the conference that the all-night negotiating sessions took him back to his days as a trade union leader negotiating with his bosses.
Quote:India, China, Brazil Briefly Walk Out of Climate Summit
Friday, December 18, 2009
P
DEVELOPING STORY: India, China and Brazil walked out of the climate summit in Copenhagen on Friday, the Press Trust of India reported.
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao and Brazilian President President Lula da Silva left the session to hold a parallel meeting, reportedly to confer about concerns over the "umbrella paragraph" in the draft of an agreement being worked on for signing later today.
The three reportedly later rejoined the conference.
Quote:12.05 Manmohan Singh, the Prime Minister of India, seems to be suffering from a very dry mouth. In between audible gulps, <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> he says the Kyoto protocol should continue to stand as a working document, insisting that we should not replace it with weaker commitments.
He says it is vital that developing nations are given the required help in meeting targets on emissions. ââ¬ÅEquitable burden sharing should therefore underlie any effective climate change regime,ââ¬Â he says.
ââ¬ÅEach one of us gathered here today accepts that those most affected by climate change is least responsible for it. . . we must address this injustice.ââ¬Â
It was, Murmur Singh's beard and 10 Janpath magic, not dry mouth.
[url="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/23/obama-the-party-crasher/"]EDITORIAL: Obama the party crasher[/url]
Quote:Barack Obama is not used to being the guy not invited to a party. At the Copenhagen global warming conference, however, he found that not everyone wanted to hang with him. Our president can't take a hint.
After Mr. Obama's bilateral meeting with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, the Chinese began sending lower-level functionaries to the multilateral meetings. A frustrated Mr. Obama pressed for another bilateral meeting, which was scheduled for Friday at 6:15 p.m. Other leaders of the countries known as the "BASIC" bloc were harder to pin down.
The Obama team tried to schedule a meeting with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and was told he was at the airport readying to leave. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva also was unavailable. South African President Jacob Zuma said there was no point meeting without India and Brazil. Then the Chinese pushed the bilateral meeting back to 7 p.m.
"We were told they were at the airport," a senior administration official said. "We were told delegations were split up. We were told they weren't going to meet." So imagine Mr. Obama's surprise when he arrived for the bilateral powwow and found all four leaders in the room already in deep discussion. "Are you ready for me?" he said with an "uncharacteristic edge" to his voice, according to a CBS News report.
"We weren't crashing a meeting," an Obama flack later explained defensively. "We were going for our bilateral meeting." But that didn't stop him from walking in where he wasn't invited. <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> Clearly, Mr. Obama learned a few things from his own White House party crashers.
There was no chair at the table for Mr. Obama so he announced he would sit next to his "friend Lula," whose staff had to scramble to make room for the president and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. On Monday, Mr. da Silva used his weekly radio program to rebuke the United States for its stance at Copenhagen.
After Mr. Obama arrived, the BASIC group was basically held hostage. They had tried politely to keep Mr. Obama at arms length, but since he showed up, decorum mandated that they find a way to save face.
The countries reached agreement on three pages of noncommittal boilerplate - and Mr. Obama rushed out to declare that he had once again saved the day. "For the first time in history," he said, "all major economies have come together to accept their responsibility to take action to confront the threat of climate change." He then left the global warming conference, hurrying to beat the record-setting blizzard descending on Washington.
U.N. General Secretary Ban Ki-moon declared that the conferees "sealed the deal." But there was no deal. The conference chose not to adopt the Copenhagen Accord after opposition from Latin American nations that are part of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's Bolivarian Alliance. The general session became the scene of high theater, or farce - at one point a Venezuelan delegate cut her hand to dramatize the blood of the poor being spilled by the rich. In the end, the document was officially "noted" by the assembled, which renders it not only nonbinding but nonexistent for those countries that choose to ignore it.
Chinese lead negotiator Su Wei made a point of saying that it was "not an agreed document, it was not formally endorsed or adopted." And while the White House argues that something is better than nothing, in some respects the accord really is nothing. Appendices One and Two, which were supposed to lay out detailed emissions targets and mitigation actions for signatory counties, were left blank.
The Copenhagen conference was a lesson in power and humility. The countries in the BASIC bloc demonstrated that the United States lacks the leverage necessary to convince them to make decisions that work against their national interests. And Mr. Obama is learning the uncomfortable lesson that there are limits to what his personal charisma can achieve.
Mr. Obama did make history at Copenhagen, but not in the way he expected. It says a great deal about American power and prestige when international leaders go to so much trouble to avoid meeting with the president of the United States. The American Century is over
' /> 
' /> Many of you understand this issue very well, so I'm merely offering up Christopher Monckton's latest presentation; which is somewhat technical, but very entertaining if you've ever watched other presentations he has delivered. Lord Monckton is a British politician, business consultant, policy adviser, writer, columnist, and inventor. He served as an advisor to Margaret Thatcher's policy unit in the 1980s. I'm also encouraging you to sign his petition. ![[Image: nps8pd.jpg]](http://i46.tinypic.com/nps8pd.jpg)