Archiving.
indiafacts.co.in/weekly-hindu-persecution-digest-15-march-22-march-2015/
All of the incidents recounted at the link are miserable, but the following is particularly relevant to this thread:
The above crime was so obviously committed by christoislamics. Don't know why Hindu twitterati didn't tweet all over the internet how this was - as it so obviously and undeniably is - a christoislamic gangrape of the Hindoo Sadhvi.
C.f. how India's demonic christo infestation so readily and falsely blamed Hindus via every christian mouthpiece (Indian christomedia), even though christians and the christomedia already know that only christoislamics are gangrapists.
As per the BBC, Modi "expressed 'deep concern' over the alleged gangrape of the nun, see bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-31918414
When he so readily expressed solidarity with christianism over this - just as he did with the christian self-inflicted church vandalisms - why didn't he issue such statements of solidarity with the Sadhvi (or against the huge number of obviously-christoislamic vandalisms, thefts and murders of Sadhus at temples, indiafacts.co.in/weekly-hindu-persecution-digest-22-march-29-march-2015/). I know it's too much to expect Hindu nationalist leaders - back to desperately dancing for peanuts from seculars, since they already got the Hindu vote - to do anything for Hindu victims of christoislam, such as ensure some justice for the Sadhvi. But he could at least have pretended to care for his votebase by issuing some soundbytes.
But I forgot, toilets/churches before temples. Nuns before Sadhvis. (Meanwhile the former Mrs Modi is being evangelised as per the news. Successfully too, it seems. Phase 1 is complete: she's signed up to work for missionary charities [i.e. evangelical activities].)
There's something disturbing about the dates:
opindia.com/2015/03/no-rallies-or-outrage-for-ramkrishna-mission-sadhvi-raped-in-west-bengal/
The BBC reported on Sat the 14th of March that the christo nun was allegedly gangraped early on that very day* - Saturday - whereas the christoislamic gangrape of the Sadhvi was reported on the 13th and so happened earlier. *The fact that the BBC was so quickly onto the christian nun story is not the noteworthy part (although it does show the networking infrastructure of Indian christians with their foreign handlers).
The disturbing bit has to do with precedent of christian behaviour to distract from christian crimes:
Christians diverted from their own brutal christo murder of Swami Lakshmananda of Orissa by quickly alleging a gangrape of a nun in orissa "by Hindus", to draw all the media headlines into a christian victimisation sob story, and thereby convert anti-christian indignation into anti-Hindu indignation while also getting the international limelight for christianism instead of having any news of the christian murder of the swami leaked into the international news.
No gangrape of the Orissa nun ever took place, and the typically compulsively lying christist nun eventually admitted that, see Radha Rajan's articles documenting the subject.
It is a reasonable question, therefore, whether christians had gangraped the Sadhvi, then ensured that the police did not throw them in prison (as per above news, the police preferred to "counsel" the victim and her assailants together as if there was but a matter of mere 'disagreement' between them) so as to prevent this explosive matter from making it into more major news. And to make doubly sure, christians may have conspired with their brothers in monotheism - islamics from BD - to orchestrate the nun gangrape, not just to divert attention from the Hindoo victim of christian gangrape, but to overshadow it entirely with a sobstory that reversed the victimisation altogether: by deliberately seeding christomedia with stories falsely insinuating Hindus would have raped some nun, when it was in actual fact (as since admitted by the BBC) christianism's own islamaniac mercenaries that had done so.
Christoislamics work together after all, as seen also in how christomedia quickly acted to protect their islamic brothers, by silencing the "christians persecuted by Hindus" nun-gangrape sobstory as soon as the facts leaked out: that islamaniacs from BD had gangraped the nun.
People may say what they will but
- there is 100% chance that it was the demon christoislamics infesting India who attacked the Sadhvi.
- there is at least 50% chance that it was christians who perpetrated the crime against the Sadhvi, as seen in how many rapes of Hindoo women are by christians or by christians working in tandem with islamics in a gangrape, as also seen in that typical example of an earlier news item re-pasted in this thread.
I note the "civilised" "Hindu" cowards - oh, slip of the tongue - vocalising all over the net are useless as usual.
They won't protect or avenge their sadhus and sadhvis,
they won't protect or avenge their Gau,
they won't protect or avenge Hindoo women,
they won't protect or avenge the Hindoo leaders and Hindoos active in temple protection who were regularly and brutally murdered by islamaniacs in TN and other states,
they won't stick up for their heathenism/Gods even in word (yet they will leap to the defence of alien unheathens like Elst and his Elst-isms, against any Hindu who should dare to criticise his subversive opinions).
If I were the superstitious kind to look for bad omens - as some "Hindu" vocalists certainly are - I'd say the above list is pretty much one big bad sign for the future of India.
But it doesn't take a crystal ball to predict that Indian "nationalists" - good only at pointlessly vocalising (usually with as only result to subvert heathenism) - will bring the downfall of heathenism and even all India with their endless talking and 0 action. De-heathenisation has robbed Indians of their spine to avenge those they ought to have kept safe by scaring the enemy into contemplating the repercussions before daring to injure Hindoos.
At most/at best, being uselessly civilised to the point of cowardice (dubbed "intellectual kshatriya" by the greatest and most subversive type of cowards, the Rajarants), they will pen yet another article, blog or twit some lines. Maybe hold some presentation or conference or lecture. They will play at being scholars or intellectuals some more. They may utter some great truism or platitude. They will make up more subversions and peddle it all over the internet as a truth. In short they will continue in their pointless, worthless behaviour. Nothing will ever be fixed. And the problems will not go away. The enemies will feel more certain that Hindoos will never retaliate and that therefore they can continue to get away with impunity by attacking Gaus, Sadhvis etc.
If people can't defend even the most important things - the things they pay such great lipservice to whenever they invoke the "Hindu" label - do they deserve to retain it?
In castigating all the cowards, exemption is of course made for such great Hindoo heathens, as the falsely framed and wrongly sentenced-for-life Rabindra Kumar Pal ("Dara Singh") - that great and active defender of the Gau. The same Dara who was thrown under a bus by IIRC Tarun Vijay (the one drooling all over Ghajjini's christomissionary actress Asin): Tarun assumed Dara's guilt and - like cowards do, who know no solidarity but only care about themselves - moreover declared that Dara was 'but a tribal' and not associated with 'us'
(Whatever either of that means: Dara is a HindOOO the likes of which emperor Julian would have been proud to associate with, for protecting the core of our heathenism - the Gau - without any apologetics). But Tarun isn't the sole one to blame. English-speaking "Hindus" near-universally sold Dara down the drain. So, as "gratitude" for protecting the Gau and other Hindus, Dara is languishing for life in prison (unless he is no more) - thanks to the christian inquisition which conspired to frame him for some alien missionary's murder - and he was tortured in prison where he was even denied water. And he was innocent.
But modern "Hindu" "nationalists" are incredible ingrates. Brave heroes the likes of Dara Singh are wasted on them, like the Gau and the Gods. That is why there will never be another Shivaji for India. Because "Hindu nationalists" will probably boo at his defence of the Vedam (a la Rajarant), will sell him off to the christian inquisition as "not one of us" (like Tarun et al did), etc.
So no wonder that christoislamics gangrape Sadhvis and steal Hindoo temple cows for butchery. No wonder that the Sri Rama temple at Ayodhya is not rebuilt. And no wonder that Ramarsethu has been damaged (is being damaged? is broken?) and people can only come up with weak excuses as to why a secular Indian govt ought to preserve it.
It takes heathens to feel gratitude, to recognise heathen heroes and to stick by their side in gratefulness and to defend them when their fortunes are cruelly reversed, and to protect Sadhvis and Sadhus and temples and the Gau, and to avenge all these when wronged. The fact that none of this ever happens (properly) among the masses of angelsk-speaking vocalists allegedly championing the Hindu cause - as seen all over the internet - is surely correlated with the great degree of their de-heathenisation and subversion.
They're quite like the current govt: nothing they do actually matters in the long run, but merely allows the noose to be drawn tighter when the time comes, and underlines how the future of India is becoming set as something rather bleak if not much, much worse.
The news was:
indiafacts.co.in/weekly-hindu-persecution-digest-15-march-22-march-2015/
All of the incidents recounted at the link are miserable, but the following is particularly relevant to this thread:
More proof that international media is conspiring against Hindu religion in India with their hand-picked narratives on "rape in India", as seen in how they deliberately ignore such cases as that of the sacred Sadhvi, who was obviously gangraped by christoislamics alone, and whose perpetrators are let off scott-free *because* they are so obviously christoislamic.
indiafacts.co.in/weekly-hindu-persecution-digest-15-march-22-march-2015/
All of the incidents recounted at the link are miserable, but the following is particularly relevant to this thread:
Quote:2. No rallies or outrage for Ramkrishna Mission Sadhvi raped in West Bengal
Report: As per a report in Patrika, a Sadhvi from the Ramkrishna Mission was brutally gang-raped on 13th March 2015.
This unfortunate incident occurred in the evening, when the Sadhvi, a resident of the Mihir Das colony in English Bazaar district in West Bengal, was returning from a market in her neighbourhood. This is when 4 youths from the neighbourhood dragged the Sadhvi into a Mango grove and gang-raped her. It is also reported that the Sadhvi repeatedly visited the Police Station to lodge her complaint against the rapists, but instead of registering her FIR, the cops were more interested in sitting with the accused and the victim to settle the matter.
Link: opindia.com/2015/03/no-rallies-or-outrage-for-ramkrishna-mission-sadhvi-raped-in-west-bengal/
The above crime was so obviously committed by christoislamics. Don't know why Hindu twitterati didn't tweet all over the internet how this was - as it so obviously and undeniably is - a christoislamic gangrape of the Hindoo Sadhvi.
C.f. how India's demonic christo infestation so readily and falsely blamed Hindus via every christian mouthpiece (Indian christomedia), even though christians and the christomedia already know that only christoislamics are gangrapists.
As per the BBC, Modi "expressed 'deep concern' over the alleged gangrape of the nun, see bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-31918414
When he so readily expressed solidarity with christianism over this - just as he did with the christian self-inflicted church vandalisms - why didn't he issue such statements of solidarity with the Sadhvi (or against the huge number of obviously-christoislamic vandalisms, thefts and murders of Sadhus at temples, indiafacts.co.in/weekly-hindu-persecution-digest-22-march-29-march-2015/). I know it's too much to expect Hindu nationalist leaders - back to desperately dancing for peanuts from seculars, since they already got the Hindu vote - to do anything for Hindu victims of christoislam, such as ensure some justice for the Sadhvi. But he could at least have pretended to care for his votebase by issuing some soundbytes.
But I forgot, toilets/churches before temples. Nuns before Sadhvis. (Meanwhile the former Mrs Modi is being evangelised as per the news. Successfully too, it seems. Phase 1 is complete: she's signed up to work for missionary charities [i.e. evangelical activities].)
There's something disturbing about the dates:
opindia.com/2015/03/no-rallies-or-outrage-for-ramkrishna-mission-sadhvi-raped-in-west-bengal/
Quote:No rallies or outrage for Ramkrishna Mission Sadhvi raped in West Bengal
OpIndia Staff / March 20, 2015 / Reports
News broke out on 14th March about an unfortunate incident of a Nun being gang-raped in a robbery case. Protests were organized, rallies taken out, and desperate attempts to communalise this sensitive issue were made by media and other interested people. But no-one felt the need to pity the condition of another woman, who too was gang-raped just a day before the above incident, in West Bengal itself.
As per a report in Patrika, a Sadhvi from the Ramkrishna Mission was brutally gang-raped on 13th March 2015.
The BBC reported on Sat the 14th of March that the christo nun was allegedly gangraped early on that very day* - Saturday - whereas the christoislamic gangrape of the Sadhvi was reported on the 13th and so happened earlier. *The fact that the BBC was so quickly onto the christian nun story is not the noteworthy part (although it does show the networking infrastructure of Indian christians with their foreign handlers).
The disturbing bit has to do with precedent of christian behaviour to distract from christian crimes:
Christians diverted from their own brutal christo murder of Swami Lakshmananda of Orissa by quickly alleging a gangrape of a nun in orissa "by Hindus", to draw all the media headlines into a christian victimisation sob story, and thereby convert anti-christian indignation into anti-Hindu indignation while also getting the international limelight for christianism instead of having any news of the christian murder of the swami leaked into the international news.
No gangrape of the Orissa nun ever took place, and the typically compulsively lying christist nun eventually admitted that, see Radha Rajan's articles documenting the subject.
It is a reasonable question, therefore, whether christians had gangraped the Sadhvi, then ensured that the police did not throw them in prison (as per above news, the police preferred to "counsel" the victim and her assailants together as if there was but a matter of mere 'disagreement' between them) so as to prevent this explosive matter from making it into more major news. And to make doubly sure, christians may have conspired with their brothers in monotheism - islamics from BD - to orchestrate the nun gangrape, not just to divert attention from the Hindoo victim of christian gangrape, but to overshadow it entirely with a sobstory that reversed the victimisation altogether: by deliberately seeding christomedia with stories falsely insinuating Hindus would have raped some nun, when it was in actual fact (as since admitted by the BBC) christianism's own islamaniac mercenaries that had done so.
Christoislamics work together after all, as seen also in how christomedia quickly acted to protect their islamic brothers, by silencing the "christians persecuted by Hindus" nun-gangrape sobstory as soon as the facts leaked out: that islamaniacs from BD had gangraped the nun.
People may say what they will but
- there is 100% chance that it was the demon christoislamics infesting India who attacked the Sadhvi.
- there is at least 50% chance that it was christians who perpetrated the crime against the Sadhvi, as seen in how many rapes of Hindoo women are by christians or by christians working in tandem with islamics in a gangrape, as also seen in that typical example of an earlier news item re-pasted in this thread.
I note the "civilised" "Hindu" cowards - oh, slip of the tongue - vocalising all over the net are useless as usual.
They won't protect or avenge their sadhus and sadhvis,
they won't protect or avenge their Gau,
they won't protect or avenge Hindoo women,
they won't protect or avenge the Hindoo leaders and Hindoos active in temple protection who were regularly and brutally murdered by islamaniacs in TN and other states,
they won't stick up for their heathenism/Gods even in word (yet they will leap to the defence of alien unheathens like Elst and his Elst-isms, against any Hindu who should dare to criticise his subversive opinions).
If I were the superstitious kind to look for bad omens - as some "Hindu" vocalists certainly are - I'd say the above list is pretty much one big bad sign for the future of India.
But it doesn't take a crystal ball to predict that Indian "nationalists" - good only at pointlessly vocalising (usually with as only result to subvert heathenism) - will bring the downfall of heathenism and even all India with their endless talking and 0 action. De-heathenisation has robbed Indians of their spine to avenge those they ought to have kept safe by scaring the enemy into contemplating the repercussions before daring to injure Hindoos.
At most/at best, being uselessly civilised to the point of cowardice (dubbed "intellectual kshatriya" by the greatest and most subversive type of cowards, the Rajarants), they will pen yet another article, blog or twit some lines. Maybe hold some presentation or conference or lecture. They will play at being scholars or intellectuals some more. They may utter some great truism or platitude. They will make up more subversions and peddle it all over the internet as a truth. In short they will continue in their pointless, worthless behaviour. Nothing will ever be fixed. And the problems will not go away. The enemies will feel more certain that Hindoos will never retaliate and that therefore they can continue to get away with impunity by attacking Gaus, Sadhvis etc.
If people can't defend even the most important things - the things they pay such great lipservice to whenever they invoke the "Hindu" label - do they deserve to retain it?
In castigating all the cowards, exemption is of course made for such great Hindoo heathens, as the falsely framed and wrongly sentenced-for-life Rabindra Kumar Pal ("Dara Singh") - that great and active defender of the Gau. The same Dara who was thrown under a bus by IIRC Tarun Vijay (the one drooling all over Ghajjini's christomissionary actress Asin): Tarun assumed Dara's guilt and - like cowards do, who know no solidarity but only care about themselves - moreover declared that Dara was 'but a tribal' and not associated with 'us'
(Whatever either of that means: Dara is a HindOOO the likes of which emperor Julian would have been proud to associate with, for protecting the core of our heathenism - the Gau - without any apologetics). But Tarun isn't the sole one to blame. English-speaking "Hindus" near-universally sold Dara down the drain. So, as "gratitude" for protecting the Gau and other Hindus, Dara is languishing for life in prison (unless he is no more) - thanks to the christian inquisition which conspired to frame him for some alien missionary's murder - and he was tortured in prison where he was even denied water. And he was innocent.
But modern "Hindu" "nationalists" are incredible ingrates. Brave heroes the likes of Dara Singh are wasted on them, like the Gau and the Gods. That is why there will never be another Shivaji for India. Because "Hindu nationalists" will probably boo at his defence of the Vedam (a la Rajarant), will sell him off to the christian inquisition as "not one of us" (like Tarun et al did), etc.
So no wonder that christoislamics gangrape Sadhvis and steal Hindoo temple cows for butchery. No wonder that the Sri Rama temple at Ayodhya is not rebuilt. And no wonder that Ramarsethu has been damaged (is being damaged? is broken?) and people can only come up with weak excuses as to why a secular Indian govt ought to preserve it.
It takes heathens to feel gratitude, to recognise heathen heroes and to stick by their side in gratefulness and to defend them when their fortunes are cruelly reversed, and to protect Sadhvis and Sadhus and temples and the Gau, and to avenge all these when wronged. The fact that none of this ever happens (properly) among the masses of angelsk-speaking vocalists allegedly championing the Hindu cause - as seen all over the internet - is surely correlated with the great degree of their de-heathenisation and subversion.
They're quite like the current govt: nothing they do actually matters in the long run, but merely allows the noose to be drawn tighter when the time comes, and underlines how the future of India is becoming set as something rather bleak if not much, much worse.
The news was:
indiafacts.co.in/weekly-hindu-persecution-digest-15-march-22-march-2015/
All of the incidents recounted at the link are miserable, but the following is particularly relevant to this thread:
Quote:2. No rallies or outrage for Ramkrishna Mission Sadhvi raped in West Bengal
Report: As per a report in Patrika, a Sadhvi from the Ramkrishna Mission was brutally gang-raped on 13th March 2015.
This unfortunate incident occurred in the evening, when the Sadhvi, a resident of the Mihir Das colony in English Bazaar district in West Bengal, was returning from a market in her neighbourhood. This is when 4 youths from the neighbourhood dragged the Sadhvi into a Mango grove and gang-raped her. It is also reported that the Sadhvi repeatedly visited the Police Station to lodge her complaint against the rapists, but instead of registering her FIR, the cops were more interested in sitting with the accused and the victim to settle the matter.
Link: opindia.com/2015/03/no-rallies-or-outrage-for-ramkrishna-mission-sadhvi-raped-in-west-bengal/
More proof that international media is conspiring against Hindu religion in India with their hand-picked narratives on "rape in India", as seen in how they deliberately ignore such cases as that of the sacred Sadhvi, who was obviously gangraped by christoislamics alone, and whose perpetrators are let off scott-free *because* they are so obviously christoislamic.