^ All converts at the bottom of the christian societal rung tend to *want* to revolt but still do so from within christianism (this is symptomatic of the christian abuse against the human mind: abuse victim makes excuses for abuser, blames itself). See African churches in America. Less obvious is the example of Philipinos - who know all about European christian imperialism and what it did to who they were - but still they are christian. See Rwandans.
At best converts osmose from christianism into islamism, into christianism (Algeria) into islamism, into... etc.
http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplay...cle.aspx?id=634
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Inculturation: Fooling the Hindu Masses</b>Â Â Â
Nithin Sridhar
15 Jun 2009
<b>Early in 1982, Father Joseph Parekatil of the Catholic Church of Parasahi, Madhya Pradesh, destroyed the sacred murti of Goddess Visveshwari Siddheswari, enshrined on the nearby Nawain Tekdi hill, and erected a small wooden cross.</b> Later, on 18 February 1983, a 31-foot high concrete cross was illegally erected on the hill. A month later, enraged villagers destroyed the cross.
On 20 February 1985, intent on regaining possession of the hill, Father Parekatil put on the orange robes of a Hindu sannyasin, built a hut on the hill, sat on a tiger skin and began performing worship in the Hindu style. As a result, thousands of simple Hindus came to the hill on Fridays, unaware of the deception going on before their eyes.
On 18 May, a complaint was registered, but to no avail. Again there was agitation in the area, and this time, on 1 October 1985, the villagers tore down the priestâs hut and tossed away the remaining pieces of the concrete cross. Father Parekatil gave up only when he was arrested a week later for breach of peace (1).
Father Parekatilâs tactic of adopting Hindu symbols to further his missionary goals is known as âinculturationâ or âindigenization.â Swami Jayendra Saraswati, Sankaracharya of Kanchi Matham, made a valid point at the âInterfaith Dialogueâ with Cardinal Jean-Louis Pierre Tauran, president of the Vaticanâs Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue, and others, in Mumbai on 12 July 2009.
[...]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Rest at link.
About the last paragraph:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Under such situation, no inter-faith interactions will bring any fruits unless the âchurchâ mends its ways. As the Kanchi Perivaar rightly affirms: âAfter such inter-faith meetings, the points agreed have to be faithfully abided. Otherwise the will be no point in holding such meetings. Unless the Church reassures Hindus that it will not conduct itself in a manner that wounds Hindu sensibilities and follows up on those assurances, such inter-faith meetings, no matter how frequently they are held, will be futile and will not serve any meaningful cause.â<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Swami is too goodytwoshoes (this is not an accusation). He's a Swamy and as such does not want to spread ill-will.
But Hindus may make a more complete stand.
<i>No</i> agreements.
There can never be any compromise or acceptance to coexist with christianism. It will forever plot the demise of all others - this is an integral characteristic of the mindvirus. Also, it has the blood of countless millions on its hands and will still lust after the blood of the remaining. If Hindus choose to coexist with christianism to whatever degree and for whatever reasons (for the sake of 'national integrity' for instance), then they are willing to accept that serial mass-genocides are forgiveable and that it's okay for christianism to have brutally murdered out Greco-Roman Religio and other European Natural Traditions, to have mercilessly crushed most of African spirituality and right to liberty, and to have bloodily genocided Native Americans. That it's okay what christianism has done and is doing to our Hindus and what it has been doing to Asia.
With such 'forgiveness' of what christianism has done to others in the world, one may at least be equally forgiving of what christianism still wants to do to Hindus, Hindu Dharma and Bharatam. Not hypocrites, right. Can stop complaining then altogether, since how are our present complaints (against the aggressiveness and murderous violence of 'the missionaries' and 'the church' - i.e. christianism) any more valid than the protestations aginst the violations of the rights of other victims of christianism?
There's no associating and no coexisting with the genocidal meme; allowing it to remain in our world without resistance is to accept its guilt and becomes part of national Karma (if there is such a thing). It should be universally and completely ostracised, from Hindu society and from Hindu minds. Any less would imply that one thinks it is possible for people to live with a bit of the enemy in their midst, that leaving a bit of a forest-fire to burn on is sensible.
At best converts osmose from christianism into islamism, into christianism (Algeria) into islamism, into... etc.
http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplay...cle.aspx?id=634
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Inculturation: Fooling the Hindu Masses</b>Â Â Â
Nithin Sridhar
15 Jun 2009
<b>Early in 1982, Father Joseph Parekatil of the Catholic Church of Parasahi, Madhya Pradesh, destroyed the sacred murti of Goddess Visveshwari Siddheswari, enshrined on the nearby Nawain Tekdi hill, and erected a small wooden cross.</b> Later, on 18 February 1983, a 31-foot high concrete cross was illegally erected on the hill. A month later, enraged villagers destroyed the cross.
On 20 February 1985, intent on regaining possession of the hill, Father Parekatil put on the orange robes of a Hindu sannyasin, built a hut on the hill, sat on a tiger skin and began performing worship in the Hindu style. As a result, thousands of simple Hindus came to the hill on Fridays, unaware of the deception going on before their eyes.
On 18 May, a complaint was registered, but to no avail. Again there was agitation in the area, and this time, on 1 October 1985, the villagers tore down the priestâs hut and tossed away the remaining pieces of the concrete cross. Father Parekatil gave up only when he was arrested a week later for breach of peace (1).
Father Parekatilâs tactic of adopting Hindu symbols to further his missionary goals is known as âinculturationâ or âindigenization.â Swami Jayendra Saraswati, Sankaracharya of Kanchi Matham, made a valid point at the âInterfaith Dialogueâ with Cardinal Jean-Louis Pierre Tauran, president of the Vaticanâs Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue, and others, in Mumbai on 12 July 2009.
[...]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Rest at link.
About the last paragraph:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Under such situation, no inter-faith interactions will bring any fruits unless the âchurchâ mends its ways. As the Kanchi Perivaar rightly affirms: âAfter such inter-faith meetings, the points agreed have to be faithfully abided. Otherwise the will be no point in holding such meetings. Unless the Church reassures Hindus that it will not conduct itself in a manner that wounds Hindu sensibilities and follows up on those assurances, such inter-faith meetings, no matter how frequently they are held, will be futile and will not serve any meaningful cause.â<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Swami is too goodytwoshoes (this is not an accusation). He's a Swamy and as such does not want to spread ill-will.
But Hindus may make a more complete stand.
<i>No</i> agreements.
There can never be any compromise or acceptance to coexist with christianism. It will forever plot the demise of all others - this is an integral characteristic of the mindvirus. Also, it has the blood of countless millions on its hands and will still lust after the blood of the remaining. If Hindus choose to coexist with christianism to whatever degree and for whatever reasons (for the sake of 'national integrity' for instance), then they are willing to accept that serial mass-genocides are forgiveable and that it's okay for christianism to have brutally murdered out Greco-Roman Religio and other European Natural Traditions, to have mercilessly crushed most of African spirituality and right to liberty, and to have bloodily genocided Native Americans. That it's okay what christianism has done and is doing to our Hindus and what it has been doing to Asia.
With such 'forgiveness' of what christianism has done to others in the world, one may at least be equally forgiving of what christianism still wants to do to Hindus, Hindu Dharma and Bharatam. Not hypocrites, right. Can stop complaining then altogether, since how are our present complaints (against the aggressiveness and murderous violence of 'the missionaries' and 'the church' - i.e. christianism) any more valid than the protestations aginst the violations of the rights of other victims of christianism?
There's no associating and no coexisting with the genocidal meme; allowing it to remain in our world without resistance is to accept its guilt and becomes part of national Karma (if there is such a thing). It should be universally and completely ostracised, from Hindu society and from Hindu minds. Any less would imply that one thinks it is possible for people to live with a bit of the enemy in their midst, that leaving a bit of a forest-fire to burn on is sensible.