I don't know anything about Swami/Baba Ramdev. It's another point I'm getting at (it's in the 3rd quoteblock).
1. news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4942272
2. http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=13298
3. Surprise! (Well, it's in this thread - so it's no surprise):
https://hinduexistence.wordpress.com/tag...ong-ering/
Above is reminiscent of Gautam Sen's experience - but one step on (see below): "As one Mizo Christian woman in Delhi explained to me politely last year: 'they are uncomfortable with the Hindu ethos'."
1) "uncomfortable with Hindu 'ethos'"
2) "dog" and "bloody Indian" to Hindu (<- isn't that what the christoBritish called the Hindus in their own country too? So maybe it's a christian thing... Ya think?)
Elsewhere on MSN already saw the christoterrorists calling Hindus who were celebrating Hindu festivals as "pagans" doing "demonism".
n) <...>
n+1) Rome part II
Meanwhile, I predict, based on the constant that is self-delusion, that *even after* christoterrorists call the indigenous - i.e. Dharmics - of the country "dog" and "bloody Indian" and "pagans" doing "demonism", modern angelsk-speaking Indians - 'sensitive' to a fault - would still never expose christianism or crypochristianism. It's all just "random", unidentifiable, anonymous perpetrators - no ideology at all. Just like the christoBritish.
Think about the Future, as a logical progression of the present (and of the course maintained up to the present). Now, extrapolate on that and pick on one of the two following things, based on what people think/"predict" is going to happen:
1. extinction
2. not extinction
The exercise is not an actual question: obviously I don't care about people's opinion of the answer. (Anyone who picked 2 is wrong, by the way.) Am just saying the obvious - that anyone else with half a brain would say: that if Hindus are aiming for extinction, they're guaranteed to be on the right path and should by all means stick to the current course.
1. news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4942272
Quote:20/02/2011
Cong MP calls Swami Ramdev a `dog'
The MP from Arunachal had misbehaved with Ramdev and called him a `bloody Indian'
New Delhi: Supporters of Swami Ramdev have said they will hold "shudhi yagna" (purification ceremony) on Sunday at the residence of Ninong Ering, Congress MP from Arunachal Pradesh, and not allow him to enter parliament for his "derogatory utterances" against the yoga guru at a camp held in the state.
[...]
[color="#0000FF"]"The local Congress MP, Ninong Ering, called Swami Ramdev 'bloody Indian' and 'a dog' and threatened him with dire consequences[/color] for his Bharat Swabhiman movement against corruption and black money," the statement said.
2. http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=13298
Quote:Anti corruption campaign irks Congress, Hurls abuse at Swami Ramdev
20/02/2011 02:52:56
BJP angry over Cong MP's slur on Ramdev
PNS | New Delhi
The BJP took strong exception to Congress MP from Arunachal Pradesh Ninong Ering ââ¬Åthreateningââ¬Â Baba Ramdev with dire consequences if he continued with his tirade against corruption.
Patanjali Yoga Peeth, Haridwar, media adviser SK Tijarabala claimed the MP also used abusive language.
ââ¬ÅHe is calling me bloody Indian.... In India I am being called a bloody Indian... This has happened for the first time,ââ¬Â said Ramdev, pointing to Ering, who stood near the dais.
ââ¬ÅEringââ¬â¢s comments are utterly irresponsible and seditious. He has abused Baba Ramdev. We condemn this outburst. Ramdev is a revered figure,ââ¬Â BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said.
3. Surprise! (Well, it's in this thread - so it's no surprise):
https://hinduexistence.wordpress.com/tag...ong-ering/
Quote:Hindu Yoga guru Ramdev today alleged that he was called as a ââ¬Ëbloody Indianââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬â¢ by a Christian Congress MP from Arunchal East Parliamentary constituencyof Arunachal Pradesh in public view during a yoga camp in the state, a charge denied by the lawmaker even as the incident drew condemnation from the BJP. This Congress MP, Ninong Ering is a Christian by faith.So it's now "his word against his word". Oh who to believe. My rule of thumb is: all else being equal, NOT the christoislamaniac.
ââ¬ÅHe is calling me bloody Indianââ¬Â¦. In India I am being called a bloody Indianââ¬Â¦ this has happened for the first time,ââ¬Â Ramdev said pointing to Congress MP Ninong Ering, who was standing near the dais where the yoga guru was sitting during the camp at Pasighat in East Siang. This pro Christian MP of Congress party hails from Pashighat and connected with various Evangelical Programmes of North Eastern Hill Church Council.
(And then, the christist needs to save his skin and declares he's the one who was persecuted - shock! "That never happened before." Except ever since Rome. But everyone knows the christian lyrics, so can sing along
ââ¬ÅThis is very unfortunate. I never said anything against himââ¬Â¦ At the end of the session, he started speaking about politics.. so I said ââ¬ËBabaji, I think we should stick to yoga instead of going into politicsââ¬â¢. I think he couldnââ¬â¢t hear meââ¬Â¦. then his bodyguards came and pushed me,ââ¬Â Ering who represents Eastern Arunachal constituency said.
Above is reminiscent of Gautam Sen's experience - but one step on (see below): "As one Mizo Christian woman in Delhi explained to me politely last year: 'they are uncomfortable with the Hindu ethos'."
1) "uncomfortable with Hindu 'ethos'"
2) "dog" and "bloody Indian" to Hindu (<- isn't that what the christoBritish called the Hindus in their own country too? So maybe it's a christian thing... Ya think?)
Elsewhere on MSN already saw the christoterrorists calling Hindus who were celebrating Hindu festivals as "pagans" doing "demonism".
n) <...>
n+1) Rome part II
Meanwhile, I predict, based on the constant that is self-delusion, that *even after* christoterrorists call the indigenous - i.e. Dharmics - of the country "dog" and "bloody Indian" and "pagans" doing "demonism", modern angelsk-speaking Indians - 'sensitive' to a fault - would still never expose christianism or crypochristianism. It's all just "random", unidentifiable, anonymous perpetrators - no ideology at all. Just like the christoBritish.
Think about the Future, as a logical progression of the present (and of the course maintained up to the present). Now, extrapolate on that and pick on one of the two following things, based on what people think/"predict" is going to happen:
1. extinction
2. not extinction
The exercise is not an actual question: obviously I don't care about people's opinion of the answer. (Anyone who picked 2 is wrong, by the way.) Am just saying the obvious - that anyone else with half a brain would say: that if Hindus are aiming for extinction, they're guaranteed to be on the right path and should by all means stick to the current course.