Christian Subversion And Missionary Activities - 6

[Husky]

Both the article linked to in the previous post and this next one are related: on the topic of inculturation.



Sharan has updated his 2-year old "Atma Jyoti Ashram" article:

http://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2011...saraswati/

Atma Jyoti Ashram: Sannyasis or Snake Oil Salesmen? – Swami Devananda Saraswati

Posted on January 30, 2011 by IS



This article was originally published in June 2009 on Vijayvaani with the title “Atma Jyoti Ashram: In sheep’s clothing” and VigilOnLine with the title “Atma Jyoti ‘ashram’: Christian priests or swindlers?”. Since that date it has appeared on various websites under various titles including Hamsa.org (now defunct) with the title “Atma Jyoti Ashram: Christian Priests Uncloaked!”. We have updated the article here, adding relevant photos and links and a subtitle that reads “Being also a critique of the Sri Ramanasramam journal Mountain Path and its editors”. This present version is a complete reference and, we hope, a better reference than the original feature. — SDS



[...]

Rest at link



Pay especial attention to things like:

1. the mention of "HinduismToday" (mouthpiece of "Himalayan Academy")

2. the details Sharan gives that are more than sufficient to indicate that VS Ramanan is a cryptochristist, not merely an "innocent" Hindu "useless idiot".

3. jetsetting Indian movements/personalities* working to acquire "converts", even handing out sannyasi robes, plus inviting others to dabble part-time ("please remain christian, yet you can still dabble in Hinduism") which is the very opposite of the old Hindu automated response of "There can be no converts to our religion, you have to be born a Hindu".

* So if Hindus want to blame anyone for the proliferation of inculturating christoterrorists, blame them. Without Indian movements propping it up, christianism's inculturation could never have acquired any standing among Hindus.



4. And this next is a paragraph which is duplicated here because I happen to find it very important. Especially the blue bit in big letters, obviously.

Deconstructing Advaita Vedanta

Most modern Indian religious teachers do take Advaita Vedanta out of its original Vedic religious context, and in so doing give a potent weapon to the enemy with which to attack Hindu religion and undermine Hindu society and culture. Sita Ram Goel, in Catholic Ashrams, writes:



“[T]he literature of Indigenisation provides ample proof that several Hindu philosophies are being actively considered by the mission strategists as conveyors of Christianity. The Advaita of Shankaracharya has been the hottest favourite so far. The Vishistadvaita of Ramanuja, the Bhakti of the Alvar saints and Vaishnava Acharyas, the Integral Yoga of Sri Aurobindo and the Vichara of Ramana Maharshi are not far behind.”



The medieval Acharyas and more recent teachers of Vedic spirituality like Sri Ramana Maharshi were able to know without difficulty the religious identity and affiliations of their disciples. They did not have to search out and verify their students’ political and religious backgrounds. This is not true today. Hindu society has become secularised in the cities and teachers are faced with multicultural audiences from different countries and traditions. They do not know who is sitting in front of them. It is therefore incumbent on all Hindu gurus in India and abroad to put their philosophical teaching into its original religious context, so that it cannot be abused and distorted by Hinduism’s scholarly Marxist and Christian enemies.



Apostle Paul and the Early Church Fathers conquered ancient Greece by forcibly secularising Greek society. They divided the unity of Greek religion and mythology from Greek philosophy and philosophic terminology. They then secularised and appropriated Greek philosophic terminology and took the Greek religious concept of an Unknown God for themselves. The religious vacuum that followed this secularization of Greek society was filled in with the Jesus cult and other Christian superstitions. Indian bishops are perpetrating the same apostolic fraud on Hindu society today when they claim that the pre-Christian Tamil weaver saint Tiruvalluvar was a disciple of the legendary St. Thomas! They add to their cultural crime by appropriating his “secular” ethical treatise Tirukkural as their own and declaring it a sectarian Christian book.

(Very important point.)



This is how ancient Greece became a Christian country, and how modern India is fast becoming a christianised Hindu country. The difference is that in modern India, ill-informed Hindu spiritual teachers and ashram administrators are assisting the Christian predators in the downfall and obliteration of their own prized Hindu religion and culture.

Correction to the start of the last statement in the above quoteblock ("This is how ancient Greece became a Christian country"):

- it's not how Hellenistic Greece was *converted* to christianism. (The GrecoRoman heathens - by no means a small number - lost ground first through christianim's calculated minorityism and strategic discrimination against Hellenismos in favour of christianism, and were thereafter converted by outright violence. In no other way could christianism ever have succeeded in GR space.)

- rather, it's how the Hellenistic character of Hellenistic GrecoRoman religion ("civilisation") was appropriated and then rewritten, and continues to be appropriated and rewritten as being "a precursor to christianism", as being "actually christian, Hellenes misunderstood it". Christians are working hard on rewriting Isha/Ishwara/Parabrahman as the non-existent jeebusjehovallah demon (in reality, Parabrahman refers exclusively to the Hindu Divine/Gods. As do the most sacred Hindu terms Isha and Ishwara, which are all Vedic=Hindu terms alone). Just as christianism is working overtime to do exactly the same thing to Daoism too.

I.e. those components of heathen religions that the christian west dubs "monism" are separated from their inseparable heathen religions and appropriated for christianism, and then reinterpreted/declared as referring to the non-existent christian 'gawd' entity instead. In short: all the so-called "monisms" are appropriated for christianism. Christianism then uses this deliberate subversion to convince the "polytheistic idolators" - that's their reference to you - that you're "actually" monotheists /that your religion is "actually" about worshipping invisible monogawds (the non-existent jeebusjehovallah) instead.



Ironically, angelsk-speaking "Hindus" are frequently seen helping christianism by declaring falsely that it is indeed all the same, and they moreover keep inviting christians to dabble part-time aka terrorise.



What they do to the "monist" aspects of heathen religion - i.e. Platonist Philosophy, which is one (intrinsic, inseparable) aspect of Hellenismos, and Vedanta/Advaitam which is an (intrinsic, inseparable) aspect of Hindoo religion, and deeeep Daoist descriptions of the Dao which is a most intrinsic inseparable aspect of the Daoist Gods/Divine - is rather like how christianism:

- first declares that Yoga is one distinct 'branch' of Hindu religion (rather than how it is uniformly seen throughout Hindoo religion, i.e. a permeating part - sinds de oertijd)

- then Yoga is declared as separate from Hindu religion ("it's actually generally 'Indic' in origin" and hence "generally 'Indian'" and thereafter "it's actually universal")

- before declaring it is "actually christian" and "about jeebusjehovallah all along".