Post 2/2
3. Indian army promotes secularism - and some even promote the christian sexual jihad via cryptochristianism. It isn't just the muslims that advocate a sexual jihad against Hindus. The christian churches have been mandating it for a *long* time in India. And crypto christians have implemented it since long, frequently pretending it's all innocent secularism just to prevent victims from waking up to what's really going on. And you can see Indians falling for christianism's under-your-skin sexual jihad whereas they only ever notice and panic about the overt/in-your-face islamic jihad.
(E.g. SL Hindu mother and cultural 'Hindu' husband had children who - invariably - ended up being secular. The son married a SL "Tamizh" christian. All that is old news. The update: the couple recently had a male child, who has a very biblical name and was baptised. The poor Hindu grandmother and all her ancestors. <- That ends her Hindu line for all time: her daughter is as secular as her son and similarly does not want a Hindu spouse* - yet note how the son married a *christian* spouse with no problems: that's because secularism is half-way to christianism already anyway, it's a conditioning variant of christianism. And secularism is the 2nd generation stage of cultural Hinduism. The 3rd generation being full-fledged christianism.
* The daughter has agreed to an arranged marriage: to an equally secular person of Indian origin. I know, because I was there when she said it: deliberately phrased my "innocuous" questions so I would have unambiguous answer to confirm - or dismiss - my suspicions. That makes her yet another person of Hindu ancestry stipulating that their spouse be anything Indian except Hindu <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Indian christians can of course apply. To seculars - being deheathenised - christians always appear the paragon of secular religions.)
Anyway, from an earlier post in the IF threads on Christian Terrorism:
In all this, the Indian army is one step more advanced than Indian "Hindu" nationalism. The whole "Indian nationalism" devolution was a dead-end and waste of time: all it did was teach India's Hindus (and those of other Dharmic religions) to Just Get Used To the christoislamicommunistic presence=terrorism in India, under the mistaken notion that a national unity with un-unifiable elements was even possible. Nationalism further erred in that it thought that christoislamicommunism wouldn't grow - and that too at Hindus' expense (i.e. nationalism thought that it could maintain the status quo of demographics and identity. *Big* mistake). Christoislamics scoff at Hindu nationalism: it does half the work for them => it gets Dharmics - and only Dharmics - to tolerate christoislamism (to "learn to live with" the parasitism), a notion which subverts heathens, and all the while christoislamism plots to exterminate Hindu and the other Dharmic religions in India.
Indian nationalism hijacked Hindus' re-assertion to be their own nation, to have the say in their own land (even while they're still a majority), to not care to owe anything to christoislamism - which are but both parasites in India (and sources of Hindu genocide) and are a scourge on the world. Hindus do NOT need to guarantee christoislamism anything in the country. Christoislamism has consumed entire nations and continents: dar-ul-islam TSP and BD, SKorea and Philipines for christ, native American geography called "US" for christ, Roman Empire for christ etc. And everywhere they have killed off all the native heathens. The very notion of "co-existence" with intolerance (derived from the heathen notion of universal tolerance - but only Hindus stubbornly perpetuate it, despite seeing its repeated effects) is impossible and self-delusional. It is suicidal. Christoislamism knows it is, which is why christianism has convinced Hindus to retain it: christoislamism parasites off of tolerant hosts, for which they *need* tolerant hosts. And nationalism forces Hindus to co-exist with intolerant christoislamism long after any natural tolerance would have worn off. Hindus should say an absolute No to tolerating any christoislamism in the country, by declaring that we WILL revert everyone (=our aim) and start implementing it: mass de-programming of christoislamism.
Hindus' declaration - were they to make it* - is reversion, which is fair and allowed. And if any cryptochristist terrorist in the local or international media terrorises Hindus for such a declaration - as being "fundamentalist/intolerants/blablabla" - just point to the unprovoked christian threats of conversion from the Pope visiting India who told his sheep to "Start converting all of Asia already" down to the catholic priests who have repeatedly threatened to take all of Tirupati's hills and Arunachaleshwarar's home etc for christ. Not to mention the various protestant kinds (e.g. "Nagaland for christ") and the orthodox syrian christians. Where's the media outcry over that? But I forget, native sheep and their overseas handlers demand the "Right to Religious Conversion" for christians, and where this is disallowed, they bleat violation of "human rights" <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> "religious rights/rights of minorities".
Christianism's threat of conversion is an OFFENSIVE.
Hindus' declaration - and shouldn't leave it at just declaration but every Hindu should go to implementation - would merely be a reactive strategy. I.e. as land-mark as it would be for Hindus to make the statement, it would still be no more than defence. It is reversion - to the natural, original state of the natives. Because Hindus never encroached on christoislamania: Hindus existed in their lands, minding their own business. Then christoislamania came all the way to Hindu Bharatam etc and invaded it and violently (and more recently using dawaganda) converted its people to the alien delusions. The christoislamics now write histories pretending they predated Hindus in Hindus' own lands. But that's the usual christian dawaganda made after the fact, and no one but christians (and their conditioned, e.g. neo-buddhists) believe it.
* Naturally, one doubts Hindus will ever say it. After all, men zegt toch "wanneer de koe verdronken is dempt men de put" / It's when a cow has finally drowned, that people will drain the well.
At best Hindus will swear by "nationalism", India's new national religion (which replaced all Hindu origins to/tendencies in nationalism). Saluting the flag (represents an India that remains unified) is the new "idolatry" that the christoislamics have to contend with and yet *still* can't abide by (not until the whole of the nation is converted to the 'true' gawd or under full control of the 'true' faith. So that, until India-for-christ and Mughalistan are achieved, the parasitism will continue to shriek for 'independent islamic Kashmir', 'nagaland for christ' to spite the nationalists etc. It wants the whole country, but will settle to get it bit by bit). But nationalism doesn't remotely scare christoislamism.
If Hindus lose, it's because they traded in their Hindu identity for a purely nationalist "Indian" one, thereby trading their (crucial) Hindu interests for the interests of "all Indians" under which christoislamania - the sworn and mortal enemies - get a free pass as well as obtaining the foremost favours (often even from the very 'nationalist party' voted for by Hindus).
3. Indian army promotes secularism - and some even promote the christian sexual jihad via cryptochristianism. It isn't just the muslims that advocate a sexual jihad against Hindus. The christian churches have been mandating it for a *long* time in India. And crypto christians have implemented it since long, frequently pretending it's all innocent secularism just to prevent victims from waking up to what's really going on. And you can see Indians falling for christianism's under-your-skin sexual jihad whereas they only ever notice and panic about the overt/in-your-face islamic jihad.
(E.g. SL Hindu mother and cultural 'Hindu' husband had children who - invariably - ended up being secular. The son married a SL "Tamizh" christian. All that is old news. The update: the couple recently had a male child, who has a very biblical name and was baptised. The poor Hindu grandmother and all her ancestors. <- That ends her Hindu line for all time: her daughter is as secular as her son and similarly does not want a Hindu spouse* - yet note how the son married a *christian* spouse with no problems: that's because secularism is half-way to christianism already anyway, it's a conditioning variant of christianism. And secularism is the 2nd generation stage of cultural Hinduism. The 3rd generation being full-fledged christianism.
* The daughter has agreed to an arranged marriage: to an equally secular person of Indian origin. I know, because I was there when she said it: deliberately phrased my "innocuous" questions so I would have unambiguous answer to confirm - or dismiss - my suspicions. That makes her yet another person of Hindu ancestry stipulating that their spouse be anything Indian except Hindu <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Indian christians can of course apply. To seculars - being deheathenised - christians always appear the paragon of secular religions.)Anyway, from an earlier post in the IF threads on Christian Terrorism:
Quote:See for instance the post about an Indian army officer's matrimonial advert for one of his daughters, posted here
http://www.india-for...indpost&p=62473
Quote:The following is a matrimonial ad, on one of those online websites:
Quote:I am Major B. XXXXX, father of YYYY, our 2nd daughter. She is working in Hyderabad.Salary 20K. I am a Hindu (Goud) and my wife is a Christian. I am a retired Army Officer and working as Faulty in an Engineering College at Hyderabad. Eldest is our son,PGDCA, Manager in an IT Firm at Bangalore. Our daughter in law is MBA, a Christian, working in an IT Firm at Hyderabad. First Daughter,M Sc(Bio Tech), married to a Hindu, Software Engineer in Bangalore. My wife is looking after my family.We are interested in a Working Hindu Boy (except SC/ST or Brahmin), preferably an
engineer or PG, settled or want to settle in Hyderabad. He must have a good family back ground, religious tolerance and should not expect any dowry. Interested persons may contact me
Even well-informed persons on this forum think the christian wife is innocent in all of this and only noticed the low sentiments of the 'Hindu (Goud)' husband in banning SC/ST/Brahmin applications. His restrictions are actually fortunate for the Hindus concerned.
Because, why is he seeking a Hindu at all? His daughter-in-law is a Christian, so what is his son? His other daughter is married to a Hindu (what is she??? if not a christian also), and what about the daughter for whom they are seeking a gullible Hindu suitor? What is she, it doesn't say.
But I can tell you with a high chance of being right that this family could well be similar to many other cases of Hindu men married to christian women in India. The children are all christian.
In all this, the Indian army is one step more advanced than Indian "Hindu" nationalism. The whole "Indian nationalism" devolution was a dead-end and waste of time: all it did was teach India's Hindus (and those of other Dharmic religions) to Just Get Used To the christoislamicommunistic presence=terrorism in India, under the mistaken notion that a national unity with un-unifiable elements was even possible. Nationalism further erred in that it thought that christoislamicommunism wouldn't grow - and that too at Hindus' expense (i.e. nationalism thought that it could maintain the status quo of demographics and identity. *Big* mistake). Christoislamics scoff at Hindu nationalism: it does half the work for them => it gets Dharmics - and only Dharmics - to tolerate christoislamism (to "learn to live with" the parasitism), a notion which subverts heathens, and all the while christoislamism plots to exterminate Hindu and the other Dharmic religions in India.
Indian nationalism hijacked Hindus' re-assertion to be their own nation, to have the say in their own land (even while they're still a majority), to not care to owe anything to christoislamism - which are but both parasites in India (and sources of Hindu genocide) and are a scourge on the world. Hindus do NOT need to guarantee christoislamism anything in the country. Christoislamism has consumed entire nations and continents: dar-ul-islam TSP and BD, SKorea and Philipines for christ, native American geography called "US" for christ, Roman Empire for christ etc. And everywhere they have killed off all the native heathens. The very notion of "co-existence" with intolerance (derived from the heathen notion of universal tolerance - but only Hindus stubbornly perpetuate it, despite seeing its repeated effects) is impossible and self-delusional. It is suicidal. Christoislamism knows it is, which is why christianism has convinced Hindus to retain it: christoislamism parasites off of tolerant hosts, for which they *need* tolerant hosts. And nationalism forces Hindus to co-exist with intolerant christoislamism long after any natural tolerance would have worn off. Hindus should say an absolute No to tolerating any christoislamism in the country, by declaring that we WILL revert everyone (=our aim) and start implementing it: mass de-programming of christoislamism.
Hindus' declaration - were they to make it* - is reversion, which is fair and allowed. And if any cryptochristist terrorist in the local or international media terrorises Hindus for such a declaration - as being "fundamentalist/intolerants/blablabla" - just point to the unprovoked christian threats of conversion from the Pope visiting India who told his sheep to "Start converting all of Asia already" down to the catholic priests who have repeatedly threatened to take all of Tirupati's hills and Arunachaleshwarar's home etc for christ. Not to mention the various protestant kinds (e.g. "Nagaland for christ") and the orthodox syrian christians. Where's the media outcry over that? But I forget, native sheep and their overseas handlers demand the "Right to Religious Conversion" for christians, and where this is disallowed, they bleat violation of "human rights" <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> "religious rights/rights of minorities".
Christianism's threat of conversion is an OFFENSIVE.
Hindus' declaration - and shouldn't leave it at just declaration but every Hindu should go to implementation - would merely be a reactive strategy. I.e. as land-mark as it would be for Hindus to make the statement, it would still be no more than defence. It is reversion - to the natural, original state of the natives. Because Hindus never encroached on christoislamania: Hindus existed in their lands, minding their own business. Then christoislamania came all the way to Hindu Bharatam etc and invaded it and violently (and more recently using dawaganda) converted its people to the alien delusions. The christoislamics now write histories pretending they predated Hindus in Hindus' own lands. But that's the usual christian dawaganda made after the fact, and no one but christians (and their conditioned, e.g. neo-buddhists) believe it.
* Naturally, one doubts Hindus will ever say it. After all, men zegt toch "wanneer de koe verdronken is dempt men de put" / It's when a cow has finally drowned, that people will drain the well.
At best Hindus will swear by "nationalism", India's new national religion (which replaced all Hindu origins to/tendencies in nationalism). Saluting the flag (represents an India that remains unified) is the new "idolatry" that the christoislamics have to contend with and yet *still* can't abide by (not until the whole of the nation is converted to the 'true' gawd or under full control of the 'true' faith. So that, until India-for-christ and Mughalistan are achieved, the parasitism will continue to shriek for 'independent islamic Kashmir', 'nagaland for christ' to spite the nationalists etc. It wants the whole country, but will settle to get it bit by bit). But nationalism doesn't remotely scare christoislamism.
If Hindus lose, it's because they traded in their Hindu identity for a purely nationalist "Indian" one, thereby trading their (crucial) Hindu interests for the interests of "all Indians" under which christoislamania - the sworn and mortal enemies - get a free pass as well as obtaining the foremost favours (often even from the very 'nationalist party' voted for by Hindus).