Christian Subversion And Missionary Activities - 6

[Husky]

This post is not for young people. It contains some things that may well be found to be distressing, but it needs to be said.



Benedict XVI on child abuse: It’s normal for men and children!

Said Pope Ratzinger. Article at link.





The comment to the above by Ishwar Sharan says somethings people should remember, not just the bits made bold:

IS, on December 13, 2011 at 8:36 pm said:



The problem of sexual misconduct among bishops and priests was there in the Church right at the beginning.



In the 1st-2nd century there was a group called the Carpocratians who believed that Jesus and Lazarus were lovers. They had an “acts” or “gospel” which described the raising of Lazarus from the dead by Jesus as a sexual encounter between the two. The Early Church Father Clement of Alexandria had all their “gospels” collected and destroyed. So we only know about them from his negative references.



The First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD is described by early accounts as an orgy of sex and violence. The 318 bishops who attended quarrelled over doctrine in the daytime and boys at night. This is the important council where Jesus, up to this point considered to be a human prophet in line of the earlier Hebrew prophets, was raised to the status of a deity by a vote of the bishops. The two bishops from Libya who dissented were soon murdered in their beds.



Clerical licentiousness got so bad by the 12th century that in 1123 that it was decided at the First Lateran Council in Rome that priests must be unmarried and celibate. They were also not allowed to live with their mothers or sisters as they could not be trusted not to rape them.



This 12th century rule is a clerical rule and not a doctrinal injunction, therefore priests have always flouted it with impunity.



Celibacy, by the way, simply means unmarried in Catholic terminology. It does not mean the priest must maintain sexual countenance.



There are hundreds of married priests and an equal number of active gay priests. It is a different matter that the Vatican does not recognise them or discipline them. At one time Catholic priests in the US had the highest number of HIV-infected members, more than any other group straight or gay.



As for child abuse, more heterosexual and married men are abusers than are gay men. Therefore the contention that priests must be allowed to marry to stop the abuse is just not true.

[color="#800080"](I have to make a very distasteful note.

Many of the abusive christoislamic priests are full-time paedophiles.

Normal people have (obviously exclusively) adult lovers.

But paedophiles can not be merely classed as straight or gay. To do so is as irrelevant to the point as describing persons who commit bestiality as being 'straight' or 'gay'.)[/color]



Orthodox Churches allow priests to marry. Child abuse is there too, as in the Latin Church. Some years ago the Greek monks of a famous Mt. Athos monastery went on strike when they were told they could no longer have boy friends.



The most famous of recent child abusers was Fr. Marcial Maciel who founded the Legion of Christ. He had two of wives / mistresses and was a close confident of Pope John-Paul II. He started his career of sexual abuse on his two sons who have publicly accused and denounced him.



The irony in all this history of Christian scandal is that sex is a sin in Christian theology and the act itself is to be condemned. Women are to blame of course, as it was Eve who gave Adam the apple that opened his eyes to her beauty and attractiveness in the biblical fairy tale.

Hindus don't seem to understand who they are entrusting their children to and what that means for the future of the nation's entire collective and for the country's heathenism.

Christianism and its long shadow will wipe away any vestige of heathenism and any possibility for it to return even in far future generations.



With its weapon of sexual abuse especially paedophilia - and it IS a weapon that christianism uses and it is moreover *institutional* to christianism - christianism will create a chain, a cycle of abuse. They have done it everywhere. I have not seen/heard of any nation break that cycle.*

In every society that has become host to the christoislamic sexual parasite,

1. Some of the victims will never become predators themselves - remaining traumatised victims throughout.

2. But a certain percentage *always* become carriers. Even if this is a minority, its very real possibility cannot be overlooked.

This is a very dreary and troubling topic, I don't wish to continue distressing on these lines any further than what I've briefly indicated. Even so I've kept it light: the repercussions I fear to be more disturbing. People MUST do something. This concerns the future of your children and your children's children.



* But with lack of a cure, prevention is Hindus only answer. For that people must prevent *christianism*. Which inevitably means it must - definitely - be removed from the nation. Even so, what to do with the generations of Indian christians sexually abused by christianism (i.e. inducted into the sexual abuse cycle of christianism's paedophilia already), many of whom are already preying on next generations in their turn?

And far worse still, christianism has already sunk its gory claws into Hindu children. This could have been prevented long ago had our ancestors had the brains - coupled with favourable circumstances - to oust christoislamism from our shores. But perhaps that would only have delayed a repeat invasion: an infestation of christianism/islamism would have returned, since neither can countenance a heathen nation existing at peace somewhere.

Christoislamism must be destroyed for good - and ALL its satellite diseases.

Else it will destroy all of humanity. (And all of heathenism certainly.)





[color="#0000FF"]ADDED:[/color]

For examples on why it's a Cycle created (intentionally) by christianism, see posts 497 and 499 of Christianism - Thread 5.