<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"This is not a 'Hand' (Congress symbol), it is the power of the 'Lotus' (BJP symbol). It will cut the head of Jai Shri Ram," Gandhi, son of the late Sanjay Gandhi and Maneka, <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->What does he mean "it will cut the head of Jai Sri Ram"? Did I misread. Or is there some other person he's referring to with "Jai Sri Ram" than the one I'm thinking of?
How can my doubting mind get confirmation he's not a plant from the KKKongressi side trying to defame Hindus with his scary-sounding rhetoric and no actual useful action in defence of Dharma. Here's a task for him - one that will not at all involve (threats of) islamically chopping off people's hands: he can send his aunty Sonia on a one-way ticket back to Italy. She's done far more damage to Hindus than merely lifting any of her fingers at them. I want her presence severed from Bharatam, no one needs her hand severed from her person.
I want purposeful action, not empty words however 'daring'.
And if people are going to say things that will get them slapped with the 'communal' tattoo, why can't they say the most relevant things: that they will eradicate christoislamism from the subcontinent, and thereby liberate the enslaved sheepish ummah from the terrorist ideologies oppressing both them and the inconvertibles of Bharatam? I guess threatening to chop off someone's hand will be found to be comparatively less communal after all, than openly accusing christoislamism of being no more than terrorism and promising to send the memetic disease packing (through educating the masses about it).
Now that's a vow worth taking on the Gita: that he will dedicate his life to saving the world from the scary mindvirus (The True Terrorism).
How can my doubting mind get confirmation he's not a plant from the KKKongressi side trying to defame Hindus with his scary-sounding rhetoric and no actual useful action in defence of Dharma. Here's a task for him - one that will not at all involve (threats of) islamically chopping off people's hands: he can send his aunty Sonia on a one-way ticket back to Italy. She's done far more damage to Hindus than merely lifting any of her fingers at them. I want her presence severed from Bharatam, no one needs her hand severed from her person.
I want purposeful action, not empty words however 'daring'.
And if people are going to say things that will get them slapped with the 'communal' tattoo, why can't they say the most relevant things: that they will eradicate christoislamism from the subcontinent, and thereby liberate the enslaved sheepish ummah from the terrorist ideologies oppressing both them and the inconvertibles of Bharatam? I guess threatening to chop off someone's hand will be found to be comparatively less communal after all, than openly accusing christoislamism of being no more than terrorism and promising to send the memetic disease packing (through educating the masses about it).
Now that's a vow worth taking on the Gita: that he will dedicate his life to saving the world from the scary mindvirus (The True Terrorism).