3. So ^Doniger^ turns out to not just be appointed by the CIA, but a christian - daughter of an evangelical looney father of missionary convictions, despite his Jewish surname. So Wendy Doniger herself is merely playacting at being secular: that is, she's been playing the cryptochristian game - attacking Hindoos from behind a secular veneer, in order to protect christianism and prevent her own christian ideological motivations from being outed.
Who couldn't have guessed? I know some nationalists tried to pass Wendy off as 'Jewish' just because her paternal surname was. But there are lots of people with Jewish (sur)names and ancestry who are actually christian, just like there are lots of Indian christians with Hindu names: it's called cryptochristianism. Like how IF members revealed that Martha Nussbaum's surname is Jewish (stolen from her ex-husband) - while she herself is evangelical christian - all so that she can hide her christianism while attacking Hindus. Martha like Doniger is a doublesneak: they let Judaism take the blame for their bile against Hindu religion. But then, christians hate Jews. Including people of Jewish ancestry who converted to christianism. No different from how Indian christians - whose ancestry was once Hindu - are inimical to Hindus.
Once more, the lesson is:
Hindus need to stop looking at people's names - and in the case of Indian-looking entities who dress Hindu: need to also stop looking at their appearance (like sari and bindu). Just listen to what they say. If they peculiarly attack Hindu religion - especially with blatant lies (christoclass lies, or one might say CIA type lies and psyops) against Hindu religion - then it doesn't matter whether they claim to be "Hindu" or "not christian", just file them under christian. Because that is what they are. If they claim to be communist and are anti-Hindu but not anti-christoislam, then they are christian.
If they hide behind Hindu names or behind an assumed Hindu/secular identity all while justifying jihad and attacking Hindu religion - as several in the Indian christomedia and govt have done over the recent islamic attacks on France vs Hindu protests on the PK nonsense - then they're christian. People know the types: the comments on Indian christomedia that start with "I'm a staunch Hindu too, but <this that and ultimately everything about Hindooism is evil>", as seen often enough, including recently over the hysteria about ghar wapsi.
Cryptochristians can only be identified - but can *accurately* be identified - by their attacks against Hindu religion & Hindus alone, filled as this is with deliberate* lies and psy-ops. It is the dead giveaway. (*Christianism knows they're lies and that's why the cryptochristians refuse to be corrected on them. That's why Donigers and various indologicals working with anti-Hindu organisations are still out there lying for dear life.)
It's how anyone could know DMK and Indian communism are christian. (They are. Like the LTTE which has started to fester in TN now.) It's how anyone can tell that most of Indian english-language media is christian (and alien-owned). It is how anyone could tell that the christo KKKangress govt is christian and colluding with the US: they attempted to pass the riot-related legislation that "only the majority [Hindus] ever riot and therefore must be punished by default if any riot occurs, whereas minorities [christoislamics] are always to be assumed to be the victim and never punished". It's not a secular law. It's a blatantly christian law, but since the govt that tried to push it didn't publicly admit to its christian ideology, it's cryptochristian. But no less christian.
The Indian christomedia (and alien-media) focusing peculiarly on rape crimes in India - but ignoring all identical cases where only easily-identifiable christoislamic names are involved in the criminality - and trying to pin it all on Hindoos/Hindoo religion instead, is also clearly christian. And for propagating this psy-ops for christian (and western) purposes, including evangelisation. [And the AmeriKKKan psyops against (East) Asian Americans was also planned at US government levels. That's why their Asian Studies dept has always been writing psyops - complete with hired native-looking voices, especially anti-Asian Asian women - against Asian men and Asian culture: to curtail Asian families/distinct Asian identity and community in AmeriKKKa. And to reduce their population in the world by alienating the women from the men. Clearly AmeriKKKans figured women could be manipulated more easily and would fall for psy-ops - not very complimentary to women, are they? Very patriarchal and condescending, in fact. In the Indian case, at least, it is known that both genders fall for psy-ops, but the west is focusing on the women again.]
And then there's the question of Devdutt Pattanaik, the new-agey self-styled explicator of Hinduism, who spews (subversionist) nonsense left and right. Yet for some inexplicable reason angelsk-speaking Hindus listen to him, though he's no more an expert than they are: he's not seen the Gods and neither have they (else they wouldn't have to listen to others on the subject of Hindoo heathenism, right?). He's approves of and agrees with Doniger. So the question is:
- Is he in on it: is he a handpicked native subversionist, who knows what Doniger is - a cryptochristian - and endorses her blatant falsehoods knowingly?
- Or did he just fall for the oldest trick in the book: get subverted by an evangelical christian just because she pretends not to be one?
Either way, that doesn't change the fundamental aspect about Devdutt: he's a subversionist of Hindoos' heathenism too. And, if nothing else (though there is much else), his taste in endorsing Doniger should count as proof of this.
I suppose it should be stated that cryptochristos (incl communists) and islamics are not the only anti-Hindu baiters. Among the international (i.e. western) kind, there are others that collude with jihadists and missionaries and communists: the self-perceived Vedicists. They want Hindoo religion destroyed among Hindoos, so that they can claim that it is now theirs (by default). They are often signatories in all things anti-Hindu. They are famous for stating things on "Hindu fundamentalists" and "poor innocent christoislamic victims" etc, all while they have No Intention of converting back into the mono-moronisms (where they belong) since at home they like to the dabble in the Vedam and "polytheism". Though they are very much a spin-off of the christoclass virus too, the way neonazis are, they are not consciously christian. They're post-christian christoconditioned (post-christian christians).
The news was:
blogs.swarajyamag.com/2015/01/10/religious-crusades-of-cia/
which reveals, among many other things, that Wendy Doniger is not just handpicked by the CIA, but far from being a secular Jew, her father is a deeply evangelical christian - which also tells you Wendy's actual religion, no matter that she may pretend to be 'secular' and deny that she's a christian. <- But that's what cryptochristianism is for: attacking heathens with christian-arguments from behind a neutral-looking cover. The other reasons for cryptochristianism - in India - is to get votes from the easily-duped Hindu majority and to trick Hindus into marrying into christianism, i.e. christian love jihad/crusade.
Who couldn't have guessed? I know some nationalists tried to pass Wendy off as 'Jewish' just because her paternal surname was. But there are lots of people with Jewish (sur)names and ancestry who are actually christian, just like there are lots of Indian christians with Hindu names: it's called cryptochristianism. Like how IF members revealed that Martha Nussbaum's surname is Jewish (stolen from her ex-husband) - while she herself is evangelical christian - all so that she can hide her christianism while attacking Hindus. Martha like Doniger is a doublesneak: they let Judaism take the blame for their bile against Hindu religion. But then, christians hate Jews. Including people of Jewish ancestry who converted to christianism. No different from how Indian christians - whose ancestry was once Hindu - are inimical to Hindus.
Once more, the lesson is:
Hindus need to stop looking at people's names - and in the case of Indian-looking entities who dress Hindu: need to also stop looking at their appearance (like sari and bindu). Just listen to what they say. If they peculiarly attack Hindu religion - especially with blatant lies (christoclass lies, or one might say CIA type lies and psyops) against Hindu religion - then it doesn't matter whether they claim to be "Hindu" or "not christian", just file them under christian. Because that is what they are. If they claim to be communist and are anti-Hindu but not anti-christoislam, then they are christian.
If they hide behind Hindu names or behind an assumed Hindu/secular identity all while justifying jihad and attacking Hindu religion - as several in the Indian christomedia and govt have done over the recent islamic attacks on France vs Hindu protests on the PK nonsense - then they're christian. People know the types: the comments on Indian christomedia that start with "I'm a staunch Hindu too, but <this that and ultimately everything about Hindooism is evil>", as seen often enough, including recently over the hysteria about ghar wapsi.
Cryptochristians can only be identified - but can *accurately* be identified - by their attacks against Hindu religion & Hindus alone, filled as this is with deliberate* lies and psy-ops. It is the dead giveaway. (*Christianism knows they're lies and that's why the cryptochristians refuse to be corrected on them. That's why Donigers and various indologicals working with anti-Hindu organisations are still out there lying for dear life.)
It's how anyone could know DMK and Indian communism are christian. (They are. Like the LTTE which has started to fester in TN now.) It's how anyone can tell that most of Indian english-language media is christian (and alien-owned). It is how anyone could tell that the christo KKKangress govt is christian and colluding with the US: they attempted to pass the riot-related legislation that "only the majority [Hindus] ever riot and therefore must be punished by default if any riot occurs, whereas minorities [christoislamics] are always to be assumed to be the victim and never punished". It's not a secular law. It's a blatantly christian law, but since the govt that tried to push it didn't publicly admit to its christian ideology, it's cryptochristian. But no less christian.
The Indian christomedia (and alien-media) focusing peculiarly on rape crimes in India - but ignoring all identical cases where only easily-identifiable christoislamic names are involved in the criminality - and trying to pin it all on Hindoos/Hindoo religion instead, is also clearly christian. And for propagating this psy-ops for christian (and western) purposes, including evangelisation. [And the AmeriKKKan psyops against (East) Asian Americans was also planned at US government levels. That's why their Asian Studies dept has always been writing psyops - complete with hired native-looking voices, especially anti-Asian Asian women - against Asian men and Asian culture: to curtail Asian families/distinct Asian identity and community in AmeriKKKa. And to reduce their population in the world by alienating the women from the men. Clearly AmeriKKKans figured women could be manipulated more easily and would fall for psy-ops - not very complimentary to women, are they? Very patriarchal and condescending, in fact. In the Indian case, at least, it is known that both genders fall for psy-ops, but the west is focusing on the women again.]
And then there's the question of Devdutt Pattanaik, the new-agey self-styled explicator of Hinduism, who spews (subversionist) nonsense left and right. Yet for some inexplicable reason angelsk-speaking Hindus listen to him, though he's no more an expert than they are: he's not seen the Gods and neither have they (else they wouldn't have to listen to others on the subject of Hindoo heathenism, right?). He's approves of and agrees with Doniger. So the question is:
- Is he in on it: is he a handpicked native subversionist, who knows what Doniger is - a cryptochristian - and endorses her blatant falsehoods knowingly?
- Or did he just fall for the oldest trick in the book: get subverted by an evangelical christian just because she pretends not to be one?
Either way, that doesn't change the fundamental aspect about Devdutt: he's a subversionist of Hindoos' heathenism too. And, if nothing else (though there is much else), his taste in endorsing Doniger should count as proof of this.
I suppose it should be stated that cryptochristos (incl communists) and islamics are not the only anti-Hindu baiters. Among the international (i.e. western) kind, there are others that collude with jihadists and missionaries and communists: the self-perceived Vedicists. They want Hindoo religion destroyed among Hindoos, so that they can claim that it is now theirs (by default). They are often signatories in all things anti-Hindu. They are famous for stating things on "Hindu fundamentalists" and "poor innocent christoislamic victims" etc, all while they have No Intention of converting back into the mono-moronisms (where they belong) since at home they like to the dabble in the Vedam and "polytheism". Though they are very much a spin-off of the christoclass virus too, the way neonazis are, they are not consciously christian. They're post-christian christoconditioned (post-christian christians).
The news was:
blogs.swarajyamag.com/2015/01/10/religious-crusades-of-cia/
which reveals, among many other things, that Wendy Doniger is not just handpicked by the CIA, but far from being a secular Jew, her father is a deeply evangelical christian - which also tells you Wendy's actual religion, no matter that she may pretend to be 'secular' and deny that she's a christian. <- But that's what cryptochristianism is for: attacking heathens with christian-arguments from behind a neutral-looking cover. The other reasons for cryptochristianism - in India - is to get votes from the easily-duped Hindu majority and to trick Hindus into marrying into christianism, i.e. christian love jihad/crusade.