Nexus Between Entities Influencing India

[Husky]

3. realitycheck.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/je-suis-tiruchengode-or-perumal-murugan/



A comment from there about the Hindu-baiting writer "Perumal Murugan" - who recently tried to pull an MFH by silencing himself and playing persecuted. Turns out he's a christian (oh what a surprise):

nparamasivam1951 said, on January 14, 2015 at 9:27 am



He (unPerumal unMurugan) is distorting the history. What he wrote about Tiruchengode festival is not real. May be his church paymasters might have asked him to defame the famous temple of Tiruchengode and residents. The Leftist are shouting because Hindus are united. Murugan, a christian convert, want to do justice to his new religion and paymasters. Otherwise, this rubbish is not fit for a book.

Reply

Can also read the main article of realitycheck.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/je-suis-tiruchengode-or-perumal-murugan/





4. Then comes the "freedom of speech under threat" drama that the cryptochristians in the form of the left and christomedia have pulled about the matter:



swarajyamag.com/culture/leftist-media-slanders-rss-bjp-to-uphold-freedom-of-libel/



Which shows how the christian author invented consensual sex "rituals" among the Hindus of Tiruchengode - which "tradition" no Hindu of the region had heard of - and how Penguin (christo publisher which published evangelical CIA-plant Doniger's anti-Hindu book and other evangelical psy-ops books) has now published the christian convert's book too, and presents it as a "native informant's view", in order to make it appear authentic to the christomoronic world:

The novel has been promptly translated into English and published by Penguin. Now, in the universities both in India and around the world, this novel has turned into a document of the existence of "traditional free consensual sex rituals" in Tiruchengode!

Of course, the entity hired to review the novel and give it three thumbs up is also a christian. In what is standard operating procedure for anti-heathen psy-ops, the christian reviewer chimes in his confirmation that the libel is all "true" - conveniently from his alleged personal experience - without giving any actual evidence either. But will be used as another "native informant" by their western paymasters/CIA fronts.

In his review of the novel, historian Theodore Baskaran calls the "novel" a repository of documentation. The reviewer specifically points to the alleged consensual extra-marital indulgence of sex by married woman on a particular day of the festival. The reviewer states that he had "known" (not seen) that such customs did exist in the local festivals of two places where he had worked.



Then the reviewer points out that Murugan has asserted that the traditional phrases prevalent in Tamil society like "the God-given child" actually refers to the child being born out of such consensual ritual sex.



The novel has been promptly translated into English and published by Penguin. Now, in the universities both in India and around the world, this novel has turned into a document of the existence of "traditional free consensual sex rituals" in Tiruchengode!



[img caption:] Perumal Murugan and the English translation of his book. Photo Credit: Niticentral



The claim of the residents of the temple town that even a nonagenarian community leader has never heard of such a tradition in the area would never reach the ivory towers of such academic institutions.



When such an asymmetry in the power of narrative exists in our academic institutions -- both within India and abroad -- it becomes important for a healthy democracy and a vibrant academic discourse that the community targeted is given a chance to challenge the narrative through absolutely legal and democratic means. And in such a situation, the writer should and does have a moral right to prove the factual nature of what he had written.

Also tell-tale of the christian hand is the christian tendency to peddle anti-semitic publications. Christian libel against the Hindus goes hand in with christian libel against Jews, after all. It's all the same christian tendency to generate psy-ops for evangelisation-or-genocide (convert-or-kill routine). More proof that unPerumal unMurugan's work has the same veracity as the anti-semitic christian genocidal hoax/forgery that is the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"

In the present Tamil literary milieu, this is of immense import. Let it be known that one of the left wing publishing houses that has published Murugan's work has also published the translation of another fiction masquerading as history in the ongoing Chennai book exhibition: The protocols of the learned elders of Zion, translated into Tamil by Aroor Salim.

Hindus should contact Israeli authorities on tracking down nazis and have them put pressure to put out of business all the communist=fascist*, publishing houses, which are obviously cryptochristian, since christos like islamaniac are the only ones who are anti-semitic and keep publishing propaganda that the nazis cherished.



* Extreme-left/communism and extreme-right/fascism are in a circle of continuity and meet at their extremes like in anti-semitism. Communism and fascism are satellite of christianism after all.





The more immediate point of the article was that the christomedia was all mobilised to screech about "freedom of speech" being stifled by the Hindu community whose reputation was tarnished by deliberate falsehoods=libel.



5. Now, while known cryptochristians like Sagarika Ghose and the catholic newspaper The Chindu etc were all on board to support libel in the form of "freedom of speech", practically all of christomedia has been doing its best to remain mum on how Sharia blasphemy laws have been imposed against an Indian lawyer for allegedly making a remark on Facebook that was offensive to islamaniacs: the Indian lawyer has been apprehended with no opportunity for bail.



More proof of christomedia: silence on serious threats to "freedom of speech" where their brothers in monotheism are involved. If the media were secular it would *all* be in the news and there will be equal hysterics (or there should be less hysterics about libel, which is not covered under freedom to screech or freedom of expression):



swarajyamag.com/politics/the-paris-tragedy-and-indian-medias-half-truths/

As I write this, a Mumbai lawyer Vijay Gaekwad stands accused of blaspheming the Prophet Muhammed. I wish I could tell you the story in detail, but it's been scrupulously avoided by the mainstream media and appears only in one article in Urdu Times. What we do know is that Gaekwad allegedly committed this offence on social media and that he spent time in jail. Beyond this, we know little.



[...]



Correction:

The Vijay Gaekwad case has been reported on in brief in two mainstream newspapers that I"ve been able to discover here and here. However it remains the case that his story has not been widely covered and there's been little if any follow up I"ve seen since the initial brief reports. Considering that he has reportedly been denied anticipatory bail, it is noteworthy how little coverage there has been.

• indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/lawyer-booked-for-fb-post-faces-arrest/
  
  
• business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/no-pre-arrest-bail-for-lawyer-accused-of-defaming-religion-115010100683_1.html
  
  

Neither article reveals what Vijay Gaekwad was to have stated on facebook. (But where's his freedom of expression.)

Perhaps reproducing his alleged statements allegedly blaspheming the alleged mohammed is considered as much of a No-No as reproducing the Danish cartoons or any islam-lampooning Hebdo issues.



It was left to the heretical muslim (apostate?) Tufail Ahmad to bring up the matter on twitter:



https: // twitter.com/tufailelif/status/551301487167422466

Tufail Ahmad ?@tufailelif

Meanwhile, Mumbai lawyer Vijay Gaekwad arrested for blaspheming Prophet Muhammad http: // www. urdutimes.net/EAssets/2015/01/03/articles/01/A2.jpg



12:58 AM - 3 Jan 2015

The real question remains: how typical only of a CHRISTIAN media to totally bury this real threat to freedom of expression: an opinion on facebook that allegedly hurts the sentiments of the worthless "minorities" (of 1 billion muslims in the world and 1 billion christians) that terrorise like a super-majority. All while the same crypto CHRISTIAN media is trying to spin patent libel against a community of Hindus into a "freedom of speech" issue.



Meanwhile islamaniacs are equating the satire against islamania by Danish and French newspapers with libel of a community, as if it's all the same. But no, it's not equal-equal.





6. This was a good read, and makes several very correct observations:

swarajyamag.com/ideas/neither-freedom-nor-tolerance-works/

Abrahamic religions, by design, seek control of the narrative by any means that may be suitable. Islam has been able to shield its theology and last prophet from public criticism fairly successfully through state-driven-curbs on free speech in partnership with pliable governments. In such situations the state fears unrest and social disorder due to its inability to deal with them. It is either too taxing on its resources to keep controlling such situations or is too bogged down by political correctness and electoral considerations to go after well-organised groups.



Christians, ever discreet in their methods, often took this route of silently lobbying for ad hoc curbs on free speech in partnership with governments rather successfully. The elite who made up the establishment as part of post-1947 India bought into -- and propagated -- the idea that social harmony that came out of silencing tough questions was more valuable to the nation than a hard, honest look at the truth or its pursuit. Their contention was and still is that protection of minorities includes protection of their ideas from criticism through legislation rather than intellectual debate.

even if the state guarantees free speech, you can be assured that organised groups that have historically taken it upon themselves to threaten critics would deliver serious consequences to anyone who falls out of their line of what is acceptable and what is not. It is this sort of impediment that is far more hideous and difficult to fight against because in the former it was the easier matter of tackling a monolith like a Constitution.



When organised religions with strong notions of blasphemy and exclusivism enter the fray, they find it imperative to unleash a situation of fear and self-censorship because they have a group that, even when small, comprises individuals who buy completely into an idea of themselves. As history tells us, such small groups of intensely committed individuals always have a greater impact and threat projection than any greater number of well-meaning but largely indifferent individuals.

The information age with all its technological progress would, many thought, defang Islamic supremacists and dent their rapacity. They believed the weakening of information asymmetry would lead to people turning more reasonable than before. That has been proved horribly wrong and naïve because the Islamic idea of a global ummah essentially received a big shot in the arm due to information explosion and a shrinking globe. It is now easier for a Konkani Muslim in Mumbai to stand shoulder to shoulder with a Rohingya Muslim from Burma or rally support for his brothers half way around the globe who he is convinced are poor victims under siege (what else could they ever be?). Further, they use the same networks to organise better, create law and order problems like the Azad Maidan protests that turned into an ugly show of strength with an emasculated state watching passively or enable the supposed influx of Rohingyas into Muslim-dominated localities in various cities with local support.



Another case in point to bolster this is the way the ISIS has used technology as a vehicle for great public relations exercises and even recruitment. This has had an enormous multiplier effect in the increasing influx of foreign warriors from across the world into the ISIS" Caliphate.



Well networked, technologically sound and impeccably organised, Islamic groups are now in a better position than ever before to issue threats to critics, delegate operations to locals from remote controlled centres and deliver on threats that only serve to entrench the fear of criticising Islam even more.



By now, some must already be going down the "but all Muslims are not radicals" or the "majority of Muslims are peaceful people" route. There are tolerant people among Muslims, but these folks have almost never mattered. Majority of the world's Muslim population lives in Muslim-dominated countries. Even if we assume that most of them are moderate or peaceful, it has not made any difference to how those nations treat non-Muslims. 'strengthening the moderates within Islam" is a doomed quest because they have almost no ground to stand on as far as Islamic theology is concerned. In fact, tolerant Muslims have almost never mattered to the Islamic weltanschauung. There is no evidence to show that, even as we speak, the so-called moderates hold any control at all on the direction Islam is taking. It is the staunch believers who have been the prime-movers and will continue to be.



As for the "Muslims are the biggest victims of violence by other Muslims" argument, it suffices to say that the victims were killed not for being Islamic but for not being Islamic enough. If the fate of not being Islamic enough is that gruesome, one can only imagine the fate of a non-Muslim. Actually one needn"t imagine. Look up some Hindu history or simply search for the word "Yazidi".



[...]



But with perpetually outraged groups armed with an assembly line of people ready to sacrifice their lives to slaughter critics, it is impossible for the state to guarantee safety to everyone who exercises his right to free speech because it is certainly not the omniscient God who "will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers" [Jules Winnfield in Pulp Fiction]. We would need a virtual police state teeming with policemen who secretly keep an eye on the ever-increasing number of potential perpetrators to be able to guarantee safety against trigger-happy mobs. Or else, we would need a dedicated force only to protect critics of the perpetually outraged. None of these is practical or possible.



It is a matter of time before people are forced to ask themselves hard questions on whether a peaceful coexistence with innately intolerant and exclusivist ideas that feed on fear is possible at all. There are no easy answers.

(The answer is easy, in the sense of straightforward and staring people in the face. It's another matter that Indians are too cowardly to finally respond to christoislamania's total war with total war.)



As I have said earlier, civilization is a thin veneer. (Hasn't everyone said that, with just about the same wording even? Actually the phrase is "civilization is but a thin veneer" <then insert something about barbarians at the gate and conclude with the need for Asimov's Foundation>.) Anyone who makes the folly of deeming it the end and not the means gets subsumed by someone else's savagery.

What islam is trying to prove by physical means - i.e. by their jihadi attacks to silence satire of islam - is that the sword is mightier than the pen. And either the west caves and makes it a truism, or it doesn't. Because India has already caved, ruled as it is by christianism, the greatest canker festering in India (no, islam is not yet the greatest threat; it is christianism - that #1 facilitator of jihad in India - that is the greatest plague on the nation).