indiafacts.co.in/what-you-need-to-know-about-david-barrett-and-700-plans-to-evangelize-the-world/
Very correct. Comments at several nationalist sites have similarly noticed that the current ploy was to push the LGBT "plight" in India and manufacture the latest controversy therewith. All these individuals' conclusions match with news items surfacing about gay issues and cross-dressing Indians whining look-at-me just for being 'different', like anyone actually cares.
The christo-infested BJP in Goa was in the news for threatening some kind of herbal treatment or something for homosexuals. Clearly a christian ploy and aimed at blaming the BJP. But then, the BJP *would* let itself get infested with christianism. Own fault.
The LGBT agenda is indeed pushed by christianism and the west in countries and regions targeted by the christowest. Besides the examples of Russia and China given by IndianNotAmused, there is of course also the famous example of the Middle-East, noticeable during the Arab Spring. Interestingly, peculiarly Iraq and ISIS - the very regions thereafter donated by the west to jihad (as is intended for India):
- At the height of the earlier drama, saw a documentary about Iraqi christian homosexuals quietly protesting/lobbying/working with alien forces.
- And of course the infamous cases of western male christian intelligence agents/assets stationed in the safety of the west setting up blogs pretending to be Syrian lesbians in Syria pretending to be oppressed by Syria's "secret police", and which fake persona was -predictably- promoted by their gay western counterparts (who were clearly in on it). Links to news reports on this were posted here.
And once the west has made use of the Indian LGBT types for its own ends, they will leave them to their own devices/feed them to the crusade/jihad fomented. Not that I care. Indian LGBT types are very anti-Hindu. The only time that they mention Hindu heathenism is opportunistically, for their own ends: to misinterpret Hindu heathenism (which is the extent of their knowledge, showing they were never heathens) to validate themselves.
E.g. not 10 years back, came across Indian gay fora actually stating in a list of "famous historic cases of homosexuality in India" that MBh has an example of ancient Gay "Hindus" in Krishna and Arjuna. They referred to some paragraph where one of the two got dressed up/tidied up for a meeting/hanging out with the other. <- Apparently this is "gay". And never mind the little detail that Krishna and Arjuna are cousins, and thus that the gay indian lobbyists were actually reading incest into the MBh. (That the LGBT Indians didn't know the unavoidable fact that Krishna and Arjuna are cousins is yet more proof that the LGBT Indians don't know anything about the MBh or any Hindu scriptures, and are probably christian - since even the most nominal Hindus know that much at least - and in their desperation to project homosexuality onto ancient Hindoo characters and materials, they can't even get the basics right and have to resort to contorting straightforward plain paragraphs to backprojected gay innunendo. And since that was indeed all the 'proof' of homosexuality they could force-fit in the ancient Hindu heathen epics/materials, I suppose that means that they just ruled out their own thesis? :morons: Don't have much sympathy for Indian LGBT types. They're just incorrigible subversionists.)
But using LGBT 'issues' to foment trouble is a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) of the christowest and its agents. Including in India.
As also the christowestern use and fostering/planting of feminism and unnatural whining about gender (like the Deepika Padukone example given above, and I initially thought that the Dr PMS troll at indiafacts was a plant for this reason), which is meant to destroy the future of families in communities and even populations that refuse to be assimilated. The example of the Asian American/E Asian case is documented here. But Russia is another example, as was seen in its export of women ("Russian brides") and the demonisation of Russian men as violent villains: in all western televised fiction where Russian characters play baddies - relevant episodes of any modern western spy series - the Russian men are always villains and always sound slurry in English too, to add to the "must be evil, can't even speak English properly" AmeriKKKan conclusion, and are always no better than thugs, whereas the female Russians are often "good guys": needing to be saved by or at least can be assimilated by the benign civilised west. This pattern was more noticeable until the mid/late part of last decade, but it's still there. Very SOP for the christowest. That aided the uni-directional export of presumably willing Russian women into the christowest. (The huge numbers of unwilling Russian/Ukrainian and Baltic women and underage females kidnapped into the christowest for violent sexual exploitation falls under human trafficking of course.)
Quote:IndiannotAmused ââ¬Â¢ 2 days ago
A new strategy these days is to use advertising media to inject potentially contentious [ according to Western norms] content into Indian social discourse,in the name of ' liberal progressivism".While not directly connected to Christianization, such kinds of subversion do serve the purpose of eroding local value systems and making a vacuum in the collective mindset.This is followed by creeping Christian ingress.Take the Myntra ad......shows ENGLISH SPEAKING women daring to "come out." The subliminal message is clear......Westernization "sets you free" from the
" backward, regressive ,torturing brown native stinky Hindu civilization". What Deepika bit...h tried to do for FemiNazism.......the Myntra bit...h tries to do for the lesbo-homo brigade. A classic case of subversion through any means possible......no wonder a nationalist like Vladimir Putin is combating gay movements [ I seriously doubt he is a dictator as we are told by the Western Christian media]. China is also taking definite steps to stop import of bullshit like this......their internet is like a fortress [ that has its drawbacks but the goods outweigh the bads, in my opinion]. However India with its
" Western ,urban middle class" is hungrily lapping up the sh...t that is being served.Perhaps this is the destiny of a people that has forgotten itself.Seriously we need a counter caucus with Indian takes on such affairs. Such organizations will formulate our stand on these issues and PUSH BACK.
Very correct. Comments at several nationalist sites have similarly noticed that the current ploy was to push the LGBT "plight" in India and manufacture the latest controversy therewith. All these individuals' conclusions match with news items surfacing about gay issues and cross-dressing Indians whining look-at-me just for being 'different', like anyone actually cares.
The christo-infested BJP in Goa was in the news for threatening some kind of herbal treatment or something for homosexuals. Clearly a christian ploy and aimed at blaming the BJP. But then, the BJP *would* let itself get infested with christianism. Own fault.
The LGBT agenda is indeed pushed by christianism and the west in countries and regions targeted by the christowest. Besides the examples of Russia and China given by IndianNotAmused, there is of course also the famous example of the Middle-East, noticeable during the Arab Spring. Interestingly, peculiarly Iraq and ISIS - the very regions thereafter donated by the west to jihad (as is intended for India):
- At the height of the earlier drama, saw a documentary about Iraqi christian homosexuals quietly protesting/lobbying/working with alien forces.
- And of course the infamous cases of western male christian intelligence agents/assets stationed in the safety of the west setting up blogs pretending to be Syrian lesbians in Syria pretending to be oppressed by Syria's "secret police", and which fake persona was -predictably- promoted by their gay western counterparts (who were clearly in on it). Links to news reports on this were posted here.
And once the west has made use of the Indian LGBT types for its own ends, they will leave them to their own devices/feed them to the crusade/jihad fomented. Not that I care. Indian LGBT types are very anti-Hindu. The only time that they mention Hindu heathenism is opportunistically, for their own ends: to misinterpret Hindu heathenism (which is the extent of their knowledge, showing they were never heathens) to validate themselves.
E.g. not 10 years back, came across Indian gay fora actually stating in a list of "famous historic cases of homosexuality in India" that MBh has an example of ancient Gay "Hindus" in Krishna and Arjuna. They referred to some paragraph where one of the two got dressed up/tidied up for a meeting/hanging out with the other. <- Apparently this is "gay". And never mind the little detail that Krishna and Arjuna are cousins, and thus that the gay indian lobbyists were actually reading incest into the MBh. (That the LGBT Indians didn't know the unavoidable fact that Krishna and Arjuna are cousins is yet more proof that the LGBT Indians don't know anything about the MBh or any Hindu scriptures, and are probably christian - since even the most nominal Hindus know that much at least - and in their desperation to project homosexuality onto ancient Hindoo characters and materials, they can't even get the basics right and have to resort to contorting straightforward plain paragraphs to backprojected gay innunendo. And since that was indeed all the 'proof' of homosexuality they could force-fit in the ancient Hindu heathen epics/materials, I suppose that means that they just ruled out their own thesis? :morons: Don't have much sympathy for Indian LGBT types. They're just incorrigible subversionists.)
But using LGBT 'issues' to foment trouble is a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) of the christowest and its agents. Including in India.
As also the christowestern use and fostering/planting of feminism and unnatural whining about gender (like the Deepika Padukone example given above, and I initially thought that the Dr PMS troll at indiafacts was a plant for this reason), which is meant to destroy the future of families in communities and even populations that refuse to be assimilated. The example of the Asian American/E Asian case is documented here. But Russia is another example, as was seen in its export of women ("Russian brides") and the demonisation of Russian men as violent villains: in all western televised fiction where Russian characters play baddies - relevant episodes of any modern western spy series - the Russian men are always villains and always sound slurry in English too, to add to the "must be evil, can't even speak English properly" AmeriKKKan conclusion, and are always no better than thugs, whereas the female Russians are often "good guys": needing to be saved by or at least can be assimilated by the benign civilised west. This pattern was more noticeable until the mid/late part of last decade, but it's still there. Very SOP for the christowest. That aided the uni-directional export of presumably willing Russian women into the christowest. (The huge numbers of unwilling Russian/Ukrainian and Baltic women and underage females kidnapped into the christowest for violent sexual exploitation falls under human trafficking of course.)