http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2008/12/loc...to-islamic.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Local muslim support to Islamic terrorists in Mumbai</b>
I had chosen to remain silent for a while, get over my shock (but keep the anger burning) after the recent dastardly terror attacks on Mumbai by Islamic terrorists.
I see a lot of references in the news media about some Muslims killed in the recent Mumbai terror attacks. Some muslim who lost his family, some muslim waiter killed, some muslim passerby shot, etc. It seems as if only the Muslims are the victims of terror. Or the media is deliberately trying to portray that Muslims are the bigger victims of terror. The classic Islamic tactic of claiming victimhood repeatedly, even though more Hindus have died in the terror attacks. (The only mention of Hindu victims, that I found more than once in the news media, are the chairman of the Yes Bank and the sister of a movie actor)
Also, there is hardly any mention being made of the local muslims who provided help to the terrorists. The attack is just not possible without any local muslim terrorists being involved.
There have been news reports (rather subdued) of three shopkeepers (some Bade Miyan restaurant behind Hotel Taj) who were involved in providing help to the terrorists to carry out the dastardly attacks. Hardly any mention is being made of the local muslim support to the terrorists. Instead we are given the usual dose of pro-muslim propaganda disguised as secularism.
The bigger problem than our pesky Islamic terrorist neighbours is our own local Islamic terrorists. It is just too easy for them to get support here.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The christomedia's careful cover-up of the ongoing genocide of Hindus by christoislamism is unrelenting and *pre-meditated*.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Local muslim support to Islamic terrorists in Mumbai</b>
I had chosen to remain silent for a while, get over my shock (but keep the anger burning) after the recent dastardly terror attacks on Mumbai by Islamic terrorists.
I see a lot of references in the news media about some Muslims killed in the recent Mumbai terror attacks. Some muslim who lost his family, some muslim waiter killed, some muslim passerby shot, etc. It seems as if only the Muslims are the victims of terror. Or the media is deliberately trying to portray that Muslims are the bigger victims of terror. The classic Islamic tactic of claiming victimhood repeatedly, even though more Hindus have died in the terror attacks. (The only mention of Hindu victims, that I found more than once in the news media, are the chairman of the Yes Bank and the sister of a movie actor)
Also, there is hardly any mention being made of the local muslims who provided help to the terrorists. The attack is just not possible without any local muslim terrorists being involved.
There have been news reports (rather subdued) of three shopkeepers (some Bade Miyan restaurant behind Hotel Taj) who were involved in providing help to the terrorists to carry out the dastardly attacks. Hardly any mention is being made of the local muslim support to the terrorists. Instead we are given the usual dose of pro-muslim propaganda disguised as secularism.
The bigger problem than our pesky Islamic terrorist neighbours is our own local Islamic terrorists. It is just too easy for them to get support here.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The christomedia's careful cover-up of the ongoing genocide of Hindus by christoislamism is unrelenting and *pre-meditated*.