Power centers in the corridors of power - 2

[Capt M Kumar]

Or is it because the NAC is essentially a representative body of unelected people who are answerable to none and similar to those who want to decide for India what India needs without bothering to check whether India actually endorses their assumed leadership? The NAC, its website informs us, “has been set up as an interface with Civil Society. The NAC would provide policy and legislative inputs to Government...”. This lofty agenda is no different from the unstated wishlist of Anna Hazare and his men. There’s more. “The NAC comprises distinguished professionals drawn from diverse fields of development activity who serve in their individual capacities.” Substitute ‘NAC’ for ‘Team Anna’, and the text, as well as the sub-text, would remain unchanged! Is the exclusion of the NAC from the Jan Lok Pal’s watch then a case of ‘civil society’ standing by ‘civil society’? Or is it because the NAC must remain accountable to none? http://www.dailypioneer.com/350169/Stran...-Anna.html