• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The tactics used by America to destroy (East) Asian society
#24
^ May perhaps post longer extracts from the above some other time (for easy search and archival purposes mainly).





The blue (and red) bits in the following.



eminism.org/readings/adoption-quiz.html

Quote:Pop Quiz on Transracial & International Adoption

by Emi Koyama

May 4, 2004



1.Why do we have constant over-representation of children of color in the adoption market compared to white children?



2.Why do we have constant over-representation of white potential adoptive families in the adoption market compared to families of color?



3.Why was there a surge of international adoption from Korea in the 50s, and from Vietnam and Cambodia in the 70s? Why were there so many orphans in these countries?



4.What is the relationship between the decline of welfare benefits and social services to poor families, the expansion of the War on Drugs and the Prison Industrial Complex, the increase of upper-middle-class welfare (disguised as "tax credits") given to adoptive families, and the increase of transracial adoptions?



5.Among the children involuntarily removed from families of color, are the majority of them abused? Or, are they "neglected," which could mean that parents could not provide enough food, medical care, or personal attention due to poverty, homelessness, "workfare" requirements, or other social and economic constraints?



6.For which group of foreign-born individuals has the Department of Homeland Security relaxed immigration laws to the point that it grants U.S. citizenship at the moment of entry into the United States? How did that happen when all other immigrants are being stripped of their rights in the aftermath of 9/11?



7.How often do Child Welfare offices intervene to stop the particular form of child abuse known as "parental racism toward their adopted child"? What messages do "children's books" specifically designed "for" transracially adopted children deliver, especially about her or his birth family?



8.Which group of children are cheaper than others to adopt? Which ones are given away for free?



9.How much does it cost to adopt and to raise a child? If that money were given to the birth parents of these children or to their communities, would it still be necessary for them to give up their child?



10.Was there a time in the U.S. history when the white government did not promote breaking down of families and communities of color, through Slavery, forced schooling, internment, incarceration, etc.?

For more information about the relationship between racism and transracial adoption industry, visit Transracial Abductees website (NOTE: Emi is the web person for the Abductees site, but is not editorially involved.)





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Answers to Not-So-Obvious Questions

Since posting the "Pop Quiz," some people have requested that I provide "answers" or additional information to help understand the magnitude of the problem. Clearly, these questions are rhetorical in nature and the answers are thus obvious, but there are some that are less obvious, so I am adding below:





3) Why was there a surge of international adoption from Korea in the 50s, and from Vietnam and Cambodia in the 70s? Why were there so many orphans in these places?



The obvious answer, of course, is the American Wars and occupations, but the extent to which they impacted the landscape of international adoption may not be as obvious.



[color="#0000FF"]The whole concept of international adoption was pioneered by Harry and Bertha Holt, the Christian fundamentalists in rural Oregon who supposedly felt sorry for the poverty and malnutrition Korean orphans were in after the Korean War but not sorry enough to have done anything to stop the American troops from killing Korean adults. After successfully lobbying the Congress to adopt eight Korean children, they founded Holt International, the oldest and largest international adoption agency.[/color]



[color="#800080"][Photo caption:][/color] The Holt Family (site)

NOTE: we do not endorse this site.



[color="#800080"][Photo caption:][/color] Operation Babylift (site)

NOTE: we do not endorse this site.



[color="#0000FF"]

The surge of Vietnamese and Cambodian adoptions in the 70s of course is the result of the U.S. invasion of the region. As the U.S. military evacuated Saigon in the Spring of 1975, President Gerald Ford approved the Operation Babylift, the plan to transport thousands of Vietnamese children to adoptive parents in the West, hundreds of them at a time, before the U.S. was forced out of the country. Some planes went down, killing hundreds of children, but the arilift continued on: Holt International even chartered Boeing 747 to ship over 400 children at most.[/color] [color="#FF0000"]In the panic before the impending collapse of the Saigon government, many of children were shipped without their birth and family documents, and some are said to be taken away against the wish of their Vietnamese parents.[/color]



4) What is the relationship between the decline of welfare benefits and social services to poor families, the expansion of the War on Drugs and the Prison Industrial Complex, the increase of upper-middle-class welfare (disguised as "tax credits") given to adoptive families, and the increase of transracial adoptions?



From "Saved by the System" by Akba Solomon in ColorLines magazine, Fall 2002:



Quote:Sure, federal law requires states to make "reasonable efforts" to keep at-risk children in their homes. But the federal government has vastly underfunded intensive "prevention," "family preservation," and "reunification" efforts since they were mandated in 1980. Last year the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services spent under $300 million for Child Welfare Services "directed toward the goal of keeping families together." But it provided an open-ended entitlement to matching funds for foster care, which amounted to about $5 billion. States also received cash bonuses for each child adopted. There is no such incentive to keep kids out of foster care, which is rife with its own well-documented mental and physical health risks.




5) Among the children involuntarily removed from families of color, are the majority of them abused? Or, are they "neglected," which could mean that parents could not provide enough food, medical care, or personal attention due to poverty, homelessness, "workfare" requirements, or other social and economic constraints on the parents?



From the same article:



Quote:...The National Association of Counsel for Children generally defines neglect as "a failure of caretakers to provide for a child's fundamental needs." Although emotional needs fit this description, child protective policy "typically concerns adequate food, housing, clothing, medical care and education." Few states make a distinction between parents who choose to neglect their children and parents who can't afford food, clothing, and shelter. Essentially, a state can take someone's child because they are too poor. Is it any wonder that nationwide, neglect accounts for a whopping 58.4 percent of verifiable maltreatment cases?




[color="#0000FF"]6) For which group of foreign-born individuals has the Department of Homeland Security relaxed immigration laws to the point that it grants U.S. citizenship at the moment of entry into the United States? How did that happen when all other immigrants are being stripped of their rights in the aftermath of 9/11?



Child Citizenship Act of 2000 changed the immigration law to grant the U.S. citizenship to children adopted from overseas by American parents automatically when they enter into the U.S. Some portion of this law did not go into effect until last year due to bureaucratic reasons (other portions did go into effect in February 2001). As far as I know this is the only class of foreign-born individuals (aside from children of U.S. citizens who are overseas) who receive citizenship automatically simply by entering into the U.S.



The change was prompted by the wealthy pro-adoption lobby, and spearheaded by Rep. Lamar Smith, a Republican from Texas who routinely votes against gays' right to be considered as potential adoptive parents, as well as against immigration rights and welfare and social service spending. In the Senate, the bill was sponsored by Sen. Don Nickles, another conservative Republican from Oklahoma. Unfortunately, no other group of foreign-born individuals have family members as well-funded and well-connected (with the exception of the Saudi royal family, it appears).[/color]



See:

[color="#FF0000"]transracialabductees.org[/color]/update/archive/00000003.html



[color="#0000FF"]7) How often do Child Welfare offices intervene to stop the particular form of child abuse known as "parental racism toward their adopted child"? What messages do "children's books" specifically designed "for" transracially adopted children deliver, especially about her or his birth family?



To the first question, see the answer to the question #5 ("emotional needs"). To the second question, there are many variations (I've personally read three, and am aware of several more) of the same story and it goes:



Quote:The protagonist has ABC characteristic while the rest of hir family has XYZ. Not feeling the sense of belonging, the protagonist travels to find hir own kind. After a journey, s/he finally finds others who are just like hir, and tries to get back to living with them. However, being raised in XYZ household, the protagonist is unable to fit in or function properly within the ABC community. OR, the protagonist is rejected by the ABC community because s/he was raised so differently. The protagonist realizes that hir true family had always been the XYZ family, and goes back. The XYZ family warmly accepts hir back, telling hir that they love hir. And they lived happily ever after.




We call this story "Animal Book Story," because ABC and XYZ are always represented as different types of animals. Sometimes, they have different marks on the body (e.g. stripes versus spots); other times, they are different species (e.g. birds and bats). But the basic story is the same: it teaches the child that it's no use trying to find her or his birth family or culture, because they won't fit in or be accepted and loved. I consider it brainwashing in the captivity--and it's promoted as a "reassuring" and "affirming" book for the child! Don't take my word for it: go to the bookstore and ask them to show a children's book you could give to a white couple who had just adopted a young child of color.



See:

[color="#FF0000"]transracialabductees.org[/color]/resource/reviews.html (at the very bottom)[/color]



[color="#0000FF"]8 ) Which group of children are cheaper than others to adopt? Which ones are given away for free?

Three factors are: race, health/disability, and age. More precisely, healthy white infants are the most expensive and everything else follows thereafter.[/color]

See:

abchurch.org/about/news3.php - NOTE: we do not endorse this site.



Compare:

* how christo aliens with christo-gawd ordained right (aka "US govt & military power") stole children from heathen Vietnamese and Cambodian parents against the latters' wishes with

* along with the final line of how "white infants are the most expensive and everything else follows thereafter". What's not stated - but is a direct implication - is that only western people are allowed to adopt/own western children, even as - as seen above - western people are allowed to openly abduct everyone else's children, in particular non-western and heathen people's children.



compare the above 2 points with:

rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/quick-notes-women-in-engineering-roma.html

(Posted by the R2004 blog member once called Inferno who has since more recently renamed himself "Pagan". Didn't know he was a Roman Hellene. Thought it was an Indian of some Hindu-like origins. Guess I was wrong. That, or he doesn't know what the word paganus meant. AnywaySmile

Quote:•Prejudiced Europe falls silent after high-decibel allegations of child-snatching: DNA tests show Bulgarian Roma couple are parents of the four-year-old blonde girl found in Greece: The Roma couple found caring for Maria were charged with abducting a minor and falsifying documents. This seems to be a common occurence: Ireland returns 2 blonde children to Gypsy parents



The last line of which links to:

news.yahoo.com/ireland-returns-2-blond-children-gypsy-parents-193730760.html

Quote:Ireland returns 2 blond children to Gypsy parents



By SHAWN POGATCHNIK October 23, 2013 5:29 PM 0 shares



DUBLIN (AP) — [color="#0000FF"]Two blond children who were taken by Irish police from their Romanian Gypsy parents were returned Wednesday to their families after DNA tests determined that the children were rightfully theirs, an episode that raised accusations of racism.[/color]

The Irish police were responding to public tipoffs fueled by media coverage of an alleged child-abduction case in Greece involving a blond-haired girl and a family of Gypsies, known as Roma.



Justice Minister Alan Shatter told lawmakers he was "pleased and relieved" that the children had been returned to their homes. He ordered the police commander, Commissioner Martin Callinan, to produce a report explaining why officers felt it necessary to take the children — a 2-year-old boy and a 7-year-old girl — from their families.



"We must all be particularly conscious of the regrettable distress that arose for the two families and their children," Shatter said.



He defended the need for police and child welfare officers to remove children from potentially dangerous homes, but cautioned that Irish authorities must ensure "that no group or minority community is singled out for unwarranted suspicion in relation to child protection issues."



In both cases, police suspected that the children might be victims of abductions because they were blond-haired and blue-eyed, unlike the rest of their immediate relatives.



An estimated 5,000 Roma have settled over the past decade in Ireland, where many have been linked to organized street-begging rackets involving children.



On Monday, police went to one Roma family's home in southwest Dublin and sought the passport and birth certificate of the girl. The family produced them, but police opted to issue an emergency child protection order and place the child in state care. Police said the Romanian passport was not useful because it had a baby photo, not the girl's current appearance, while the birth certificate did not match Dublin hospital records.



On Tuesday, police in the midlands town of Athlone went to another Roma family's home and asked both parents to provide mouth-swab samples from their son and themselves. The boy then was taken away by social workers overnight and returned the next day after the child's parentage was confirmed.



Irish child protection law prohibits the publication of the names of either family because their cases involve the placement of children into state protective custody.



The Athlone family's father told reporters he had assured police that other relatives also had blond hair and blue eyes. He said his wife couldn't sleep all night and the boy's older sister cried much of the night.



The Dublin family's lawyer, Waheed Mudah, issued a statement outside the Family Court accusing the police of acting without justifiable cause.



Mudah said his clients were "very conscious of the fact that this case has been linked" with the Greek child-abduction case, "which has nothing to do with them."



He said his clients hoped parents across Ireland would "consider how they would feel if one of their children was taken away in similar circumstances for similar reasons. They hope no other family has to go through the experience they have suffered."



Pavee Point, a Dublin-based support group for Gypsies, said the police were guilty of racial profiling and child abduction.



The group's co-director, Martin Collins, said he feared that more children "of Roma parents who are not dark-skinned and have brown eyes could be taken away, one after the other, for DNA test after DNA test. It's outrageous. It's despicable."



Ireland's national police, the Garda Siochana, confirmed that both children were returned to their families Wednesday. In a statement the force defended its actions as consistent with child-protection laws, and said the public should be assured "that we take extremely serious(ly) all reports received from members of the public concerning child welfare issues."



The above underlines how the christowest gets all angry and irrational when non-western people somewhere has fair haired/light-eyed kids (only because Roma are part-European), and immediately assume that the kids must be kidnapped. The kids are impounded because non-western people aren't allowed to possess (purportedly) western kids. The other way is of course open season: western people being free to legally abduct non-wetsern children by the truckloads, I mean plane-loads (as seen in Vietnam, Cambodia).



Asians, S Americans and Africans should snatch away all children that are Asian/African or S American from western "adoptive" parents/families and orphanages. All such children are most obviously abducted: when they didn't give birth to the children, the children clearly don't belong to them.



Then need to set up a private DNA database of all the native families who have lost children to christian orphanages where converts (genocidal maniacs) kidnapped kids and sold them to aliens overseas. Then look for a match up of the DNA of these parents with the DNA of all children abducted into alien families, and repatriate these children. (Lots of Hindu families in the NE, especially Vanavasi Hindus, have had their children stolen by christo-aliens via the christo-converted demons/middlemen owning Indian missionary "schools" which serve as abduction half-way houses. See the article "Their other dirty linen" by Sandy Welch, either at internet infidels or secularweb.)

Children whose parents can't be tracked (tentatively to be considered potentially genuine orphans) can be repatriated into Hindu/other Asian/African communities of the particular region from which they were stolen.*



After all, all stealing of children of other populations is - as per the genocide convention - an ACT OF GENOCIDE. The christowest engages in this regularly. You can see alien cinestars regularly collecting accessories in the form of aligator shoes/handbags - I mean their adopted-abducted "ethnic children" - to carry along and show off (to show them off as a trophee of how liberated/non-racist they are), when they are by definition racist for stealing the children of other populations and they are directly involved in the genocide of the ethnic populations by abducting from them. If they actually cared, they would have helped native communities to look after their own young - which is what any heathen would do.



(* A la how China very correctly insists that all their pandas in alien zoos - including those bred by alien zoos - be returned to the native soil.

Speaking of other animals, I remember that earlier this year or so, American trekkers had spotted what they ignorantly assumed was a dog cub among a wolf pack, and so they "heroically" abducted it to "safety". Turns out their Saviour Attitude was - typically - wrong: they had brilliantly kidnapped it from its parents and family, and so it yelped miserably. Useless people. Authorities had to step in and were faced with the difficult task of trying to track down the parents to repatriate the wolf cub. Who knows how it turned out. But oh the losers. Can ya stop meddling already?

Note that if they had abducted a panda in this fashion, repatriation could easily be lethal to the abductee: other pandas apparently instantly detect when a panda has been in human company and will consider it tainted/subverted and therefore kill it. This happens with some species. Anyway, it's one of the reasons why humans find it hard to return pandas that are bred or reared in captivity into the wild: they don't last long.)





Related to the topic of Alien Abductions and especialy Playing Jeebus:

In recent years, the christopropaganda machine came out with the box-office US movie "Machine-gun preacher" based on the 'true' story of some fundy christist American biker or something who decided to go off to (missionised in) the Sudan and play saviour/channel jeebus there (complete with machine gun apparently, going by the 'inspired' title): apparently he turned himself into a saviour of the Sudanese children. (I wouldn't be surprised if he started an lucrative abduction centre there to ship Sudanese babies to the US to "save" them from the christoislamic violence in Sudan.) The christist AmeriKKKans were all ga-ga about the movie and how emotional and beautiful and salvific (and jeebus-like) it all was. Meanwhile everyone else recognised it for the christowestern (and islamic) violence against native society that it was, and that the movie was nothing more than christian dawaganda.





There is of course an unspeakable side to child (including infant) trafficking and which is another and most imperative reason as to why heathen parents should never lose sight of their young, and never - oh but never - let them anywhere near christoconverted cannibal sheep, alien or native missionaries/priests/nuns and the like, missionary centres like churches/christian schools or christian orphanages etc.

For all the reasons you don't - ever - want to know or think of: just don't let them out of your sight. And warn other heathens as well.
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
The tactics used by America to destroy (East) Asian society - by Husky - 12-03-2013, 06:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)