<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->After Budhism and Jainism ideology merged into Hindus ethos, Hindus are now coward bunch.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But even after bauddha-jaina had influenced/merged into hindu ethos, did not Hindus still produce the likes of Rana Pratap, Shivaji, Govind Singh, Chhatrasaal, down to colonial period nationalist revolutionaries?
The present day situation is nothing to do with "buddhism" and "jainism" merging into Hindu ethos - but Hindu not realizing the truth that they are still bound. And not realizing that what binds them is this less than visible bondage, that they are still not independant, and that they are being manipulated by the enemy by conrolling how Hindus think - by misleading them into blindness and delusion.
This process of de-kshatriyization, began ignorantly by Gandhi, and is carried forward cunningly by neo-Gandhists. Gandhi was not a follower of jaina or bauddha. Was he? He was a bonafide vaishnava hindu (even if misguided and confused).
But even after bauddha-jaina had influenced/merged into hindu ethos, did not Hindus still produce the likes of Rana Pratap, Shivaji, Govind Singh, Chhatrasaal, down to colonial period nationalist revolutionaries?
The present day situation is nothing to do with "buddhism" and "jainism" merging into Hindu ethos - but Hindu not realizing the truth that they are still bound. And not realizing that what binds them is this less than visible bondage, that they are still not independant, and that they are being manipulated by the enemy by conrolling how Hindus think - by misleading them into blindness and delusion.
This process of de-kshatriyization, began ignorantly by Gandhi, and is carried forward cunningly by neo-Gandhists. Gandhi was not a follower of jaina or bauddha. Was he? He was a bonafide vaishnava hindu (even if misguided and confused).