<!--QuoteBegin-G.Subramaniam+Jul 28 2008, 05:37 PM-->QUOTE(G.Subramaniam @ Jul 28 2008, 05:37 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->a-la modi[right][snapback]85261[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->What that line implies about Modi is not correct. Whatever Modi may or may not think of the unappealing nasty principles of the terrorist religion, he intends on doing right by all Gujaratis.
Even the TOI and ExpressIndia, trying to paint him evil in all possible ways, can't wipe out how his words (and actions) oppose everything the media says of him:
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/People_must_point_out_my_mistakes/articleshow/1619304.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Asked about when the Sachar Committee on the status of Muslims came calling in Gujarat, Modi says: "They asked me, what do you do for Muslims? I said I do nothing. Please write my words down carefully, I do nothing for Muslims or for Hindus. Whatever I do, I do for 50 million Gujaratis."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Compare that to Madmoron Stink's "Islamis must get first claim on resources". Who is the true secularist, and who are the communalists?
And actions speak louder than words, when even the muslim poster boy of the anti-Modi campaign (a Gujarati tailor, I think it was, who was offered a supposed 'safe haven' in W Bengal - check threads in IF for news about the actual person) moved back to Gujarat since he found that things were better under Modi's governance than in desolate, communist-dictated Bengal.
Modi could just have lied and said he was islam's best friend - the way communistos and christoislamists always woo Hindus come voting time, after battering them during the rest of their reign. But Modi just spoke plainly and said he works for all Gujaratis without any bias and then let Gujarat's prosperity speak for itself.
Hindu secularism scares christoislamicommunism, because it benefits everyone without petting christoislamism and dhimmifying Hindus. It is totally unacceptable kaffiri behaviour to grant heathens the same rights as jehovallah's own privileged faithful. As Saint Thomas Aquinas famously said: '"Unbelievers deserve not only to be separated from the Church, but also... to be exterminated from the World by death." - Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, 1271'
And failing that, it is incumbent on the faithful to make the life of the unbelievers hellish even in this life. Since Modi refuses to make Dharmics suffer while making christoislamics comfortable, christoislamania will not forgive him.
Even the TOI and ExpressIndia, trying to paint him evil in all possible ways, can't wipe out how his words (and actions) oppose everything the media says of him:
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/People_must_point_out_my_mistakes/articleshow/1619304.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Asked about when the Sachar Committee on the status of Muslims came calling in Gujarat, Modi says: "They asked me, what do you do for Muslims? I said I do nothing. Please write my words down carefully, I do nothing for Muslims or for Hindus. Whatever I do, I do for 50 million Gujaratis."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Compare that to Madmoron Stink's "Islamis must get first claim on resources". Who is the true secularist, and who are the communalists?
And actions speak louder than words, when even the muslim poster boy of the anti-Modi campaign (a Gujarati tailor, I think it was, who was offered a supposed 'safe haven' in W Bengal - check threads in IF for news about the actual person) moved back to Gujarat since he found that things were better under Modi's governance than in desolate, communist-dictated Bengal.
Modi could just have lied and said he was islam's best friend - the way communistos and christoislamists always woo Hindus come voting time, after battering them during the rest of their reign. But Modi just spoke plainly and said he works for all Gujaratis without any bias and then let Gujarat's prosperity speak for itself.
Hindu secularism scares christoislamicommunism, because it benefits everyone without petting christoislamism and dhimmifying Hindus. It is totally unacceptable kaffiri behaviour to grant heathens the same rights as jehovallah's own privileged faithful. As Saint Thomas Aquinas famously said: '"Unbelievers deserve not only to be separated from the Church, but also... to be exterminated from the World by death." - Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, 1271'
And failing that, it is incumbent on the faithful to make the life of the unbelievers hellish even in this life. Since Modi refuses to make Dharmics suffer while making christoislamics comfortable, christoislamania will not forgive him.