04-14-2007, 03:29 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->why is there a fierce opposition to a Hindu narrative by various sections?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Because Hindu themselves are weak and always tried to please others. None can deny, what is yours. You need guts and skill.
In school history books, they talk about Muslim butcher with glory, Akbar, Aurangzeb, Gaznavi, Gori, Not a single book discusses Haqikat Rai or other heroes. Why Hindus don't demand adding Hindus heroes in history books?
Why Hindus accept narrative written by foreigners and even better is written by some Indian? e.g K.Elst etc. Every Indian site refers to them not to Hindus writers.
Why they are more acceptable even half of the time they are junk or cut n paste?
Because Hindu themselves are weak and always tried to please others. None can deny, what is yours. You need guts and skill.
In school history books, they talk about Muslim butcher with glory, Akbar, Aurangzeb, Gaznavi, Gori, Not a single book discusses Haqikat Rai or other heroes. Why Hindus don't demand adding Hindus heroes in history books?
Why Hindus accept narrative written by foreigners and even better is written by some Indian? e.g K.Elst etc. Every Indian site refers to them not to Hindus writers.
Why they are more acceptable even half of the time they are junk or cut n paste?