3. Mentioned at the end of the above article:
freethinker.co.uk/2011/11/19/sexy-eyes-offend-saudi-purity-police/
Again, there's some funny and sensible comments at this 2nd link too that are worth reading.
And one of the comments is this little gem (which belongs in the christianism thread):
Good for them.
Just wish I could have said the same for my kind. Schade.
If Indoos are very fortunate, they may assert themselves too ... 2000 years from now, was it?
freethinker.co.uk/2011/11/19/sexy-eyes-offend-saudi-purity-police/
Quote:Sexy eyes offend Saudi purity police
The latest report out of Saudi Arabia concerning the mad activities of the purity police suggests they are now considering a ban on the display of sexy eyes ââ¬â womenââ¬â¢s eyes, that is.
The Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (CPVPV) have apparently detected instances of provocative eye displays in the Islamic Kingdom, and have decided that a clamp-down is required.
Spokesman of the Haââ¬â¢eal district, Sheikh Motlab al-Nabet said the committee has the right to stop women whose eyes seem ââ¬Åtemptingââ¬Â and order her to cover them immediately.
Three years ago the BBC reported that a Muslim cleric in Saudi Arabia had called on women to wear a full veil, or niqab, that reveals only one eye.
[color="#800080"](Obviously the cleric has no idea of the power of even just one eye.... But if the cleric took out both of his own, he wouldn't have to witness any of it any more, now would he? Problem solved at the very root.)[/color]
Sheikh Muhammad al-Habadan said showing both eyes encouraged women to use eye make-up to look seductive.
The latest announcement came days after the [color="#0000FF"]Saudi newspaper al-Watan reported that a Saudi man was admitted to a hospital after a fight with a member of the committee who ordered his wife to cover her eyes. The husband was then stabbed twice in the hand.[/color]
The CPVPV have draconian powers over the lives of ordinary Saudis, but these do not appear to extend to the countryââ¬â¢s royal elite. A Wikileaks document released last year said that:
Quote:ââ¬ÅWild Western-style partiesââ¬Â are regularly held at royal palaces in Jeddah, away from the reach of the committee, who stands helpless against any royal violations.
[color="#800080"](Just like the innumerable papal orgies throughout the ages even while the lay christomoronic priesthood were told to get rid of their wives and become celibate. But then christoislamism was always one and the same religion.)[/color]
It was reported that alcohol, drugs, dancing and sex were a feature of these bacchanalian parties.
[color="#800080"](Christoislamism has nothing to do with Bacchus. So why involve him and his?)[/color]
Again, there's some funny and sensible comments at this 2nd link too that are worth reading.
And one of the comments is this little gem (which belongs in the christianism thread):
Quote:StonygroundHave to admit, Brits are more sensible than Indians (must be because they were the colonisers and the Indoos the colonised), but at least they will plan to gang together to get the RC church's sinister shadow banned from their country. Meanwhile Indians are all for slobbering all over christianism even when it's not their religion (but inimical to the homegrown varieties besides!), and for "dialoguing" with the Vatican/RC church, even while Ireland closed the door to the Vatican and when there's an official opportunity for people in the UK to do so too.
November 20th, 2011 at 9:02 am
Apologies for being OT but [color="#0000FF"]there is a government petition afoot for the UK to follow the Irish and close our embassy to the Holy See.[/color]
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/22434
At present there are only about 250 signitures so it needs some help.
Good for them.
Just wish I could have said the same for my kind. Schade.
If Indoos are very fortunate, they may assert themselves too ... 2000 years from now, was it?