Islamism - 7

[Husky]

^ Gah. What's the SL govt doing? Should issue a blanket ban on all its citizens* from going to the middle-east for work or whatever reason. And in the meantime the govt should aggressively create a public awareness campaign of what's been happening to unsaved infidels who did venture there, to show how the alleged "work opportunities" there aren't worth it.



[* Well minus the christoislamics, who are monotheists already, and can hardly be affected by the experience. I daresay they're happiest in the islamic pardees.]





Anyway,

Allah's Most Faithful AKA "Defenders of the Faith" (Ansar al Diin) are now turning Mali - of sufi-islamoronism - into the next islamic pardees: clearly the truer muslims don't think sufis count, and they'll have no argument. Like christianism, the truer islam proves its trueness by playing Last Man Standing even with its own "heretics".



And so it seems the jihad in Mali has displaced some 300,000 Malians (since March this year I think it was). Last I heard it blew up a bunch of islamic graves in Timbuktu that the international news went into deep consternation about.



There's also been fatal casualties though. Among them, are these next two: accused of adultery. They were given no time to make their case or even protest it, it seems, as the beginnings (and end) of their arguments came while they were being stoned to death: they were faintly heard to deny that the very children they were accused of having brought forth - and who were held up by islam as "proof" of their "adultery" - weren't even theirs.



A peek at the Mali to be. And it isn't pretty. (But then, only muslims imagine dar-ul-islams are a pardees on earth)



nytimes.com/2012/07/31/world/africa/couple-stoned-to-death-by-islamists-in-mali.html

Islamists in North Mali Stone Couple to Death

By ADAM NOSSITER

Published: July 30, 2012



BAMAKO, Mali — Islamists in control of a town in northern Mali stoned a couple to death after accusing them of having children outside of marriage, a local official who was one of several hundred witnesses to the killings said Monday.





The official said the bearded Islamists, armed with Kalashnikov rifles, brought the couple into the center of the town of Aguelhok from about 12 miles away in the countryside. The young man and woman were forced into holes about four feet deep, with their heads protruding, and then stoned to death at about 5 a.m. Sunday, the official said.



“They put them into the holes, and then they started throwing big rocks, until they were dead,” the official said, speaking by satellite phone from the remote desert town near the Algerian border.



“It was horrible,” he said, noting that the woman had moaned and cried out and that her partner had yelled something indistinct during the attack. “It was inhuman. They killed them like they were animals.”



The official insisted that he not to be identified because he said “our lives are in danger here.” The official said many of the 2,000 people in Aguelhok had already begun leaving, crossing the border into Algeria, as a result of Sunday’s stoning.



The stoning was the Islamists’ most brutal reported act of repression so far. Refugees from the north have given numerous accounts of public whippings and beatings for alleged violations of Shariah law in the main towns of Timbuktu and Gao.



All of northern Mali, a vast area larger than France, most of it desert, is in the hands of Islamists linked to Al Qaeda, after a rebellion against the Malian government that began in January. The rebellion began as a new iteration of a decades-long struggle by a nomadic ethnic group, the Tuaregs, to gain autonomy from a central government based in the south that it had long accused of neglect and persecution.



But the Tuaregs were soon overtaken by their de facto allies, a local Islamist movement, the Ansar Dine, or Defenders of the Faith, which itself was allied with Al Qaeda. Ansar Dine now controls the region, in alliance with another radical Islamist splinter group, the Mujao, or the Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa. The groups share the goal of imposing an extreme form of Shariah law on the people of northern Mali.



The official in Aguelhok said [color="#0000FF"]the rural couple were heard to protest, faintly, that the children — the youngest a baby of 6 months — were not even theirs. But the men who executed them said the couple had been guilty of a serious crime, and deserved punishment.[/color]



“All they said was, it was the law of Shariah that prescribed it, that God willed it,” the official recalled. He said the execution had lasted about 15 minutes, but the woman died quickly, after crying out.



In silence, more than 300 people from the town watched. “The people protested, that no law could possibly prescribe such a thing,” the official said.

(Hate to throw cold water on people, but have these Malians even *read* the koran or bible? Death by stoning is the prescribed punishment for adultery. Which is why islam is also famous for stoning muslim women raped by other muslims: apparently getting raped is adultery too. <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> Clearly the word doesn't mean what I thought it meant...)



“On the slightest pretext, they execute people.”

(Yup. Sounds quite like christoislamism. Remember how the whole "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" biblical law resulted in millions of men, women and children being randomly pointed out as "witches" and gruesomely tortured then burnt?

And children getting brutally murdered for "witchcraft" - even by relatives including "parents" - is ongoing in christianised African nations. No point in pretending all this isn't biblical/koranic.)





Aguelhok drew notoriety early in the rebellion, in January, as the place where dozens of Malian Army soldiers were apparently summarily executed, according to human rights groups. Some had their hands tied behind their backs and their throats cut.



A protest over the executions by angry soldiers’ wives in the capital, Bamako, in early February was an early sign that the government was in trouble. The government was later brought down by a military junta in a coup d’état at the end of March, allowing the Tuaregs and Islamists to overrun the north.



The south is still in disorder, with the junta still active behind an appointed civilian government whose powers remain uncertain. On Friday, the interim president, Dioncounda Traoré, returned to Bamako from Paris after an absence of over two months following an attack by a mob — some said orchestrated by elements in the military — that left him seriously injured.



In a televised speech on Sunday, Mr. Traoré announced a reorganization of the government with the aim of recovering the troubled nation’s unity.



A version of this article appeared in print on July 31, 2012, on page A4 of the New York edition with the headline: Islamists In North Mali Stone Couple To Death.

Amazing how relentless mindviruses are. Ya think they don't like the species?



Malians should violently throw out christoislamism (nothing else works). A no-holds-barred fight for Malians' right to live. Between christianism and islam, Africans are being beaten black and blue.





As for the dead, I suspect trigger-happy Islam is merely making an example out of the 2 people, to let the heretic inhabitants know loud and clear that Shariah's rolled into town. But for all we know the alleged couple might not even have been lovers. Plus, there's islam's paranoia where it readily reads adultery into every occasion: gets all worked up even when an unmarried man and woman smile at each other out of mere politeness or are seen talking to each other out of necessity.

[And I remember some news about a video that edited together bits of Paki/Afghan men dancing at some wedding and bits of Paki/Afghan women dancing (elsewhere in the building, according to eyewitnesses) and how the video-mix was sent to the local mullahs, who then concluded (islamically) that they "must" all have been dancing together, and so had all the muslims in the video executed. Note how dancing and especially men and women dancing together is a Big No-No in islam.]





Some supporting data for the statement that 300,000 Malians have fled on account of the Jihad ("muslims running from True islam"):



mg.co.za/article/2012-07-31-adulterous-couple-stoned-to-death-in-mali (Mail & Guardian, Zuid-Afrika)

The West African nation, once seen as a pillar of democracy in the troubled region, has been split in two since a coup in March. Tuareg rebels took control of Mali's vast north but they have since been driven out by al-Qaeda-linked extremists seeking to impose their radical interpretation of sharia law. An estimated 300 000 people have fled.

What "radical" "interpretation" of sharia law?

All correct readings of sharia law are radical, because shariah IS radical. When the koran says "decapitate the infidels" and "stone adulterers to death" because "allah wills it so" (e.g. see red bit highlighted in news above), it doesn't mean "go and sip tea with the accused". It really means allah demands stonings and decapitations. Like the bible's gawd clamours for stonings of adulterers, and heathen babies' brains dashed against rocks, and witches not being suffered to live (which is why christians have been providing dashed baby brains down to the present, as far as Uganda, and Congolese kids are being murdered owing to adult Congolese christians' biblical paranoias about "witchcraft". And just a few years back an actively militant American christian cult made it into the news for clamouring to install biblical laws too, including stoning for adultery. Apparently they are "without sin" and hence ready "to cast stones" - a loophole in the alleged expression attributed to the jesus character.

Anyway, I think practical instances of all 3 biblical injuctions have been recorded from news reports etc in IF's threads. So it ain't just islamania that's creepy that way.)



Just because not all islamics or christians are ready or even willing to - "inshallah, deus volt" - provide their non-existent jeebusjehovallah his required orgy of violent, bloody entertainment, doesn't mean that that's *not* what the biblical/koranic injunctions are. And because both sources of drivel are considered the "word" of jeebusjehovallah, it will always give rise to believers who hold themselves - and hence others - to it.



When it will all end? Maybe only when the species does. At least all this mental garbage can't transfer to other species: animals can only be killed, not "converted". That's something.