Islamism - 7

[Husky]

5. And here's the re-written Chindu article. But two chindu links to the same article, which seems a bit odd...



thehindu.com/news/national/alqaeda-sets-up-new-wing-in-indian-subcontinent/article6378530.ece

thehindu.com/news/international/south-asia/alqaeda-sets-up-new-wing-in-indian-subcontinent/article6378530.ece?homepage=true

("South Asia": Chindu - with their typically christo slave mentality - echoing their US superiors like Kissinger.)

Al Qaeda announces India wing, renews loyalty to Taliban chief



File photo of Ayman al-Zawahiri.



Al Qaeda leader Ayman al Zawahri on Wednesday announced the formation of an Indian branch of his militant group he said would spread Islamic rule and "raise the flag of jihad" across the subcontinent.



In a 55-minute video posted online, Zawahri also renewed a longstanding vow of loyalty to Afghan Taliban leader Mullah Omar, in an apparent snub to the Islamic State armed group challenging al Qaeda for leadership of transnational Islamist militancy.



Zawahri described the formation of "Al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent" as a glad tidings for Muslims "in Burma, Bangladesh, Assam, Gujurat, Ahmedabad, and Kashmir" and said the new wing would rescue Muslims there from injustice and oppression.



(By all means "rescue" them and put them in TSP. No one wants muslims - or christos - in the rest of the subcontinent.

Nice to see that, just like "Hindus" don't recognise the existence of Hinduism or of the adherents of it (Hindus), Zawahri doesn't recognise India either: note how he lists Indian states next to the country Burma. It's all one big dar-ul-harb territory from islam's POV: Al-Hind.



Should start using "Hindu" in the Arabic sense - like the Arabic-speaker, the Kurdish Iraqi muslim acquaintance did: over the phone to her husband, she explained that she was not alone and referred to the gathered trio of Indian Hindu, Indian Jain, and a Paki muslimah dressed in top-to-toe black hijab as "3 Hindus" were with her. Now, whether the Kurdish muslim knew the latter was Pakistani or Indian is secondary, since the important bit is that it was obvious to everyone including especially the Kurdish muslimah that the Paki was a muslimah, yet she was grouped with the Hindus and labelled a Hindu. Hence "Hindu" merely means Indian to Arabic-speaking muslims, or at least to Iraqi Arabic-speakers. Whether it means Indian by ethnicity or merely by nationality to them, I don't know.

But since "Hindu" has been made to mean everything already - unVedics, anti-Vedics and non-theists included, i.e. non-heathens - why not include christos and islamics of India too? Or even of the subcontinent? Since Hindus did insist there is no such thing as Hindus/Hinduism and that all Hindu groups are equally related to Jains/Buddhists and to extinct nastikas as they are to each other, then it should be added that Hindus are about as related to christoislamics too. Why only conveniently blur some lines and not others? Arabic definition it is. So there are muslim hindus (=therefore largest group of hindus in India!), christian hindus, Jain hindus, Sikh hindus, neo-Buddhist and Buddhist hindus and "Other Assorted" hindus/miscellany. Easy anonymous extinction. <- I didn't start this, BTW - people with no foresight did - it's just the logical corollary. Anti-Hindu aliens missed the opportunity.

No matter, the informal term 'HindOOs' refers to that real group delineated (by fellow heathens like Daoists, Shintos etc, and by many Hindoo heathens themselves, not just me) as the heathen Hindus, i.e. shorthand for those ethnic inhabitants who are attached to the Gods=religion of the ancestral heathenism of the subcontinent, the Sanatana Dharma/Vedic religion. And that makes HindOOS the majority still. And there's some safety in numbers. Beats being dismissed and then silently genocided - picked off one by one - under "the miscellaneous".)



Counter-terrorism experts say al Qaeda's ageing leaders are struggling to compete for recruits with Islamic State, which has galvanised young followers around the world by carving out tracts of territory across the Iraq-Syria border.

(In other words, this is AQ/Indian islamania's desperate bid to remain relevant in the islamic world.)



Islamic State leader Abu Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi calls himself a "caliph" or head of state and has demanded the loyalty of all Muslims.



The group fell out with Zawahri in 2013 over its expansion into Syria, where Baghdadi's followers have carried out beheadings, crucifixions, and mass executions.



As well being an indirect repudiation of Islamic State, the announcement could pose a challenge to India's new Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. He has already faced criticism for remaining silent about several incidents deemed anti-Muslim, underscoring fears that his Hindu nationalist followers will upset religious relations in the majority Hindu nation.

(See, Modi will be considered anti-muslim even if though he bid muslims a happy eid. So he may as well have lived up to the title and told christoislamani to go back to pakiland already. Hindu nationalist leaders/parties were always wasting their time trying to gain christoislamaniac friendship by humouring them and even fawning over them.)





However, while al Qaeda is very much at home in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border area, due to influential contacts and a long presence there, it is a minnow compared to local militant groups in terms of manpower and regional knowledge.





Safe haven



Over the years Zawahri and his predecessor Osama bin Laden, killed by U.S. forces in 2011, repeatedly pledged allegiance to Mullah Omar, in return for the safe haven he granted their followers in Afghanistan.



The statement did not mention Islamic State or Baghdadi, but it appear to take a subtle dig at the group's efforts at administering areas it has seized in Iraq and Syria.

(:hysterical



Islamic State's effort at state-building is something never attempted by al Qaeda's central leaders, who traditionally have preferred to plot complex attacks on targets in the West.



(Remiscent of - albeit a more deadly version of - the elaborate plots villains used to think up to do away with Batman and Robin in that old hippie-era show. Actually, come to think of it, all those AQ videos - claiming this and that attack were their handiwork - are sort of like the Monologuing Villains syndrome seen so often in that Batman series.)



Zawahri called for unity among militants and criticised "discord" - echoing a common al Qaeda complaint against Islamic State's record of clashing with rival Islamist groups in Syria.

(It could be argued that IS only gained momentum because of their drawing lines between islamics, since Shiites were less Takfiri - less likely to threaten other muslims with apostasy - than Sunnis were. Sunnis were therefore more ready to kill whoever necessary to achieve their ends, including their own "brothers" in islam.)



The statement also warned al Qaeda's new wing against oppressing local populations - another complaint levelled against Islamic State by critics in Iraq and Syria.



"If you said that you are doing jihad to defend the sanctities of the Muslims, then you must not transgress against them or their money or honour, and not even transgress your mujahideen brothers by word and action," he said.



"Discord is a curse and torment, and disgrace for the believers and glory for the disbelievers," he said. "If you say that by your jihad you do not want but the pleasure of Allah, then you must not race for governance and leadership at the first opportunity."

(AQ is simply trying to win over all of Indian islamania. AQ itself split with IS - and they have declared competing Khalifates - so it's not like AQ is all for one brotherhood in islam.)



Muslims account for 15 percent of Indians but, numbering an estimated 175 million, theirs is the third-largest Muslim population in the world.



Centuries of rule by medieval Muslim invaders drove a wedge between Hindus and Muslims. Tensions have grown since Pakistan was carved from Muslim-majority areas of India in 1947, a violent partition in which hundreds of thousands were killed. In the era of Washington's "war on terror", some Indian Muslims have begun to sympathise more with hardline pan-Islamic groups and causes.



(Typical christomedia Chindu: it wasn't rule by medieval muslim invaders that "drove a wedge" between Hindus and muslims. It is the infernal intolerance of the missionary monotheisms - the christoclass virus - that has made co-existence impossible. Hindus still try - moronically - to get along, and still get genocided. It is a one-way affair.)



Keywords: al-Qaeda, India, Al-Zawahiri

The above current news is part of the larger plot that was already evident in post 647 somewhere above



zeenews.india.com/news/world/jihad-group-calls-for-attack-of-indian-targets-worldwide_933488.html

Jihad group calls for attack of Indian targets worldwide

Last Updated: Tuesday, May 20, 2014, 12:15



Washington:A jihad group has released a 10-minute video that calls on key fundamental Islamic leaders to attacks Indian targets worldwide in retaliation for the alleged atrocities commited against Muslims in India.



According to a translation provided by the Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor of the Washington DC-based Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), the jihad group goes by the name of Ansar Al-Tawheed fi Bilad Al-Hind (The Supporters of Monotheism in the Land of India).



It quotes its leader, Abd Al-Rahman, as appealing in Arabic to Taliban leader Mullah Muhammad; Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri; the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, and Al-Qaeda's leaders in Yemen (Nasser Al-Wuhaishi), in Somalia (Mukhtar Abu Al-Zubair), and in North Africa (Abu Mus'ab 'Abd Al-Wudoud), to come forward to protect the Muslims of India.



[...]



The video concludes with Abd Al-Rahman seeking the support and advice of these Islamic leaders to attack Indian Government interests and its economic centers in India or abroad until the government collapses.

(In other words, ... India's jihad groups operating against India/Hindus are all the Islamic Arm of the AmriKKKan-KKKangress Alliance. Notice how islamania always riots on KKKaangress/AmriKKKan schedule and against *their* enemies.

The Indian jihadi group's stated aim of deliberately destabilising the BJP government gives away their puppeteers: since KKKangress/US couldn't dislodge BJP during the elections, the US/KKKangress - by means of carefully applied jihad - are going to make sure that the Indian populace will come to regret electing a nationalist govt and will learn to never do so again.

...)

And islamaniacs' constant whining that islamics in India are persecuted is so tiresome. Why can't the islamania (or all monotheism) infesting the dar-ul-harbs of the subcontinent just get lost to TSP? That's HUGE tracts of land carved out for the monotheists. Yet they insist on jihading everyday in India, then whine persecution, and then call their taliban brethren in to raise a call to arms to "protect" these whiny jihadists in India. Obviously no one who is willing to put up with this can be sane. But psecular defenders of monotheism are not famed for sanity.





Anyway, repeat: Development will soon be off the agenda. What with the "Ansar Al-Tawheed fi Bilad Al-Hind" aka "The Supporters of Monotheism in the Land of India", the IM/Indian Mujahideen aka all Indian muslims ultimately, the Lashkar e Toiba, not to mention NLFT, NDFB, and various other christoislamic terror cells, the many Islamic State (IS) volunteers in India and now Al Qaeda India, it will be a hard time for even the most terrorist I mean ardent of Indian militant "pacifist" anti-Hindu pseculars to continue to ignore jihad. Sort of like how Mira Kamdar (was it?) suddenly shut up her inversionist activism - about how it was Hindus persecuting islamaniacs - as soon as Kamdar's own cousin was blown up/shot up by islamania in the Mumbai attacks.

Nothing but that sort of event ever gets psecular Hindu-baiting terrorists (all complicit in the christoislamic genocide against the Hindus owing to their conscious negationism) - again: nothing but seeing their relatives jihad-ed too gets Hindu-baiters to shut up. So they may look forward with equal ...expectancy to the upcoming jihad.





Personally, am looking forward to Rajarant declaring once more how he is going to play an "intellectual kshatriya" to fight off the jihad - just like he declared that Vedic rituals, temples and the Hindoos who did such stuff were all useless against islam (must be like how Shivaji - an incorrigibly Vedic ritualist Hindoo, the exact definition of what Rajarant boos and hisses at :Rajarant can't take it back: - was so "useless" against islam, whereas the likes of Rajarant has obviously reclaimed so much Hindoo land and people from islam, no?)



Anyway,

1. the Hindu side is more subverted, new-agey, de-heathenised, Bauddhised and anti-Hindu than ever before.

2. More pseculars and clueless vocalists than ever before. Like that Ravish who thinks that it is communal to opposed to christoislamic jihad and to wish it confined to TSP or further away (or to wish it permanently vapourised).

3. Islamania is more determined than before (perhaps more bloodthirsty too, after such a long pause): islam grows in determination after ever defeated round, plus they're choosing to try jihading India again at this time after having partially-lost last time, thus pointing to some increased degree of confidence in their winning "this time round".

4. now there are christo-communists, pseculars and other anti-Hindus working hand-in-hand for jihad's success and for Hindus' demise,

5. now christos have declared all out christostates in India like Mizoram etc in the NE and genocided and ethnicly cleansed Hindoos there. And christos in Goa have just a few months back insisted that the govt should prevent Goa's "culture" from being diluted by Hindu migrants from the rest of India, pointing to Kashmir's special status where other Hindus' migration to Kashmir has been discouraged by law owing to islamania+psecularism. Apparently some part of erstwhile Andhra Pradesh - Telangana I think - has taken an anti-Indian position and threatened to declare itself independent too. (Who didn't see that coming? All states breaking up is for christoislamania's divide-and-conquer routine alone, or at least will be hijacked for this purpose.)



So considering 1-5 (and more): "Oh, who will win?"

Actually, none of 2-5 are relevant. It is 1 that is deterministic - in itself - as to the outcome of this latest face-off of Hindu India vs christoislamicommunist takeover (jihad in this example). The sole advantage over the past is that there are proportionally fewer Hindoos in India now, which works in Hindus favour: i.e. not all victims of jihad will Hindus, many - at least in time - will be anti-Hindus.







And the actual news was:

sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/09/04/india-alert-after-al-qaeda-video



4 Sep 2014 - 7:58pm

India on alert after al-Qaeda video



Al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri (pic) has said his terrorist group has a new branch in India. (AAP)



India has gone on alert after al-Qaeda's leader announced the terrorist group would be setting up a new branch in the Indian subcontinent.

Source

AAP



4 Sep 2014 - 6:39 PM UPDATED 1 HOUR AGO Tweet 0



Terrorist group al-Qaeda has set up a branch in South Asia, prompting Indian authorities to issue a nationwide alert, media reports and officials say.



Al-Qaeda head Ayman al-Zawahiri announced the plan in a 55-minute video message posted on the internet on Wednesday. Indian officials said the video appeared to be authentic.



Al-Zawahiri called on Muslims to "wage jihad against its enemies, to liberate its land, to restore its sovereignty and to revive its caliphate".



Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent will be led by Asim Umar, chief of al-Qaeda's Sharia committee in Pakistan, it said.



[...]



economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/asim-umar-head-of-al-qaedas-india-unit-all-you-need-to-know/articleshow/41689750.cms



NEW DELHI: In an alarming development, al-Qaeda has established a new branch to wage jihad in India, revive its caliphate and impose sharia in the Indian sub-continent, US media and intelligence agencies said today. The creation of the group called "Qaedat al-Jihad in the Indian Subcontinent"



[...]

It's every psecularists' [and psecular party's] efforts come true: while stoking up unfounded fears of alleged "Hindu communalism", they opened the floodgates for one of the True Communalisms ("True Religions") to show up at full strength.