Islamism - 7

[Husky]

Comparing islamic reactions to their jihadi attack in Paris.

The comparison is between when muslims are in a minority in regions where they are afraid of a backlash/getting kicked out, vs when in christoruled psecularistans thar are on fast-tracked for christoislamic takeover (India) vs in islamic pardeeses. Starting closer to home.





1. The Christoislamic Republic (Conversion Work In Progress) of India:



Islamaniac Yaqub Qureshi, BSP leader, declares support and even promised money to fellow islamaniacs who did what he only dreamt of:

'Whatever happened in Paris was absolutely justified': Vile UP cleric ...

Daily Mail-8/01/2015

Addressing journalists in Meerut on Wednesday evening, Haji Yaqub Qureshi, who is also a former state government minister, said: “Any work ...

BSP Leader Says Charlie Hebdo Journalists Deserved Death ...

International Business Times, India Edition-8/01/2015

Add promoting enmity charges to case against Qureshi: IPS officer

The Indian Express-10/01/2015

BSP leader booked for 'defending' terror attack

The Hindu-9/01/2015

Maya's silence on Qureshi triggers speculation

Times of India-9/01/2015

Explore in depth (128 more articles)

The catholic Chindu's piece is tell-tale of subcontinental christianism's avowed brotherhood with islam in the matter of converting India into monotheism central. It puts crucial verbs in quotes and uses alleged to add deniability:



thehindu.com/news/national/bsp-leader-booked-for-defending-terror-attack/article6772888.ece

Updated: January 10, 2015 01:34 IST

BSP leader booked for ‘defending’ terror attack

First Transfer Fee Free - Great Rates on International Money Transfers. Low Fees. Big Savings. www.nzforex.co.nz



Bahujan Samaj Party leader Haji Yaqoob Qureshi was booked on Thursday for allegedly defending the terror attack on the Paris satirical magazine Charlie Hedbo by saying disrespect to Prophet Mohammad should invite death.

Meanwhile some other islamics - doing taqiyyah - as resorted to their tactic of downplaying the gravity of Qureshi's support for terrorism by the usual Indian islamic (and christomedia) means: by declaring it was "but a publicity stunt" and hence not serious/did not reflect qureshi/islam.



Unlike the christocommunist The Chindu rag, which tried to be hazy about whether the islamaniac BSP leader uttered his islamic utterances or not (=Indian christian protectionism of jihad), even the dailymail UK says it like it is:



dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2902538/Whatever-happened-Paris-absolutely-justified-Vile-cleric-Haji-Yaqub-Qureshi-offers-Rs-51-crore-REWARD-Charlie-Hebdo-butchers.html

'Whatever happened in Paris was absolutely justified': Vile UP cleric offers Rs 51 crore REWARD to Charlie Hebdo butchers

• Haji Yaqub Qureshi said magazine 'committed a crime by attacking religion'
  
  
• Qureshi said 'any work against the Prophet must not be tolerated'
  
  
• He offered reward to 'any individual or organisation' claiming responsibility
  
  
• Qureshi has declared himself the most popular Muslim politician in India
  
  
• UP police have launched a probe into Qureshi's statement
  
  

By Piyush Srivastava



Published: 23:03 GMT, 8 January 2015 | Updated: 23:03 GMT, 8 January 2015

2. Christopislamic Republic (Conversion Completed) of Pakistan:



asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/In-South-Asia-say-Je-suis-Charlie-at-your-own-risk

January 14, 2015 7:00 pm JST

Journalists in the crosshairs

In South Asia, say 'Je suis Charlie' at your own risk



KARL KALTENTHALER





[Img caption:] Pakistanis in Peshawar rally Jan. 13 in support of the recent murders of journalists, cartoonists, an economist and others in Paris. © AP



Attacks on staff at Charlie Hebdo and shoppers at a kosher supermarket in Paris this month have left Europe stunned and uneasy. Many felt, while they mourned, that this type of attack could happen again.



Then it did. Only two days after the satirical magazine's two main attackers were killed Jan. 9, the office of the Hamburger Morgenpost in Germany was firebombed. The paper was attacked for publishing satirical cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad. Security forces throughout Europe are on alert for further attacks.



Most of the world watched the events in Paris unfold in horror. In South Asia, however, the news was greeted with relative indifference, or even outright support for the attackers. Why did reactions in South Asia differ to those in much of the rest of the world?



Sadly, attacks on journalists in South Asia, particularly in Afghanistan and Pakistan, are frequent and deadly. Pakistan often ranks as the most dangerous country in the world to practice journalism; Afghanistan is not far behind. Being a journalist in Bangladesh is also dangerous, though lethal attacks are less frequent.



Journalists die in these three countries every year for reporting news taken for granted in other parts of the world.



Reasons to be fearful



Why is practicing journalism so dangerous in South Asia? One reason is that Islamic militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan are numerous and powerful. They very frequently target journalists for reporting negative news about their actions, justifying attacks by arguing reporters oppose their "sacred mission" to bring Sharia law to their countries.



They also frequently target commentators for alleged "blasphemy" against Islam. The militants frequently stage attacks because they know that violent action against left-wing or secular commentators often boosts their popularity among the masses.



Public opinion does not, in general, support freedom of speech over the protection of a "correct" portrayal of Islam in South Asia. Pakistan has a blasphemy law that prescribes the death penalty for anyone who is convicted of denigrating the Prophet Muhammad. The law is quite vague in its definition of denigration, and thresholds for accusation and indictment are low. The law has widespread support in the country.



If the cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo worked in Pakistan, they could have been put to death for their work by the Pakistani state. That is, if militants or mobs did not kill them first.



"Je suis...?" Hardly



In Afghanistan, the situation is worse. The liberal and secular element in Afghan society is extremely small: Most Afghans support the death penalty for those who stray from Islam or insult the prophet. Public demonstrations in support of the Paris attacks took place in the country.



You would be hard-pressed to find people in Pakistan and Afghanistan willing to say "Je suis Charlie" in a public venue.

The author has carefully avoided inclusion of India in "South Asia", which is entirely correct. However, in this case, India is also being christoislamised and regular censorship - enforced by the christomedia, islamic bollywho and KKKangress govts where and when in charge - where christoislam is concerned are in effect. And various parts of India are moving to Sharia, like W Bengal. The Islamic underworld of bollywho will never make anti-terrorist movies - as it sympathises with the islamic terrorists - so all their movies are anti-Indian and anti-Hindu and pro-terrorists ("poor islamic terrorists"), and christians in the film censors make sure all pro-jihadi, anti-Indian, anti-Hindu movies are passed as seen with Leela Samson and her push for PK etc. Christoislamis are brothers in monotheism (and consequently jihad), after all.



More pertinent to the attacks on French soil is that since the event, in India - unlike the west - the christomedia has overtly imposed a ban on free speech where (christo)islam is concerned, with christo journalists' tweets declaring - the way they specifically didn't when it came to the anti-Hindu MFH, anti-Hindu PK or anti-Hindu Donigers - that "freedom of speech" suddenly has limitations, which is of course an oxymoron. Every crypto-christian was out in force on this.



Freedom of speech should be unlimited. The right to tell the truth about christoislamania and communism - and to offend christoislamaniacs - is totally worth the constant barrage of christoislamaniac verbal insults hurled against Hindoo religion and Hindoos. Besides, Hindoos have grown a thick skin - getting thicker by the minute: Hindus are used to it. True, heathen Romans used to understandably burn crappy christo dawaganda books, but Hindus mostly don't care about even the extreme and blatant lies - taking lies to court mostly - as long as it remains lawful to tell the unpalatable truths about christoislam and thereby halt the conversion madness among those who are literate and somewhat reasonable (jeebus never existed, you know: jesusneverexisted.com).



3. Another islamic nation: Turkey

Turkey is islamising more rapidly, but is still more secular than Pakistan or even christoislamising India, where Yaqub Qureshi would totally have got away with his statement had the christian KKKangress still been in charge in the nation.



As a result of Turkey's tiny bit of residual secularism, their threat of dire consequences regarding the post-attack release of the French magazine are more subtle, but nevertheless undeniable.



channelnewsasia.com/news/world/turkey-vows-to-thwart/1592410.html

Turkey vows to thwart 'Mohammed insults'



POSTED: 15 Jan 2015 18:54



Turkey on Thursday (Jan 15) condemned the publication of cartoons of the Muslim prophet as an "open provocation," warning that it would not tolerate insults of Mohammed in the controversy over the post-attacks Charlie Hebdo issue.

(Note the hint of a very real threat.)



ANKARA: Turkey on Thursday (Jan 15) condemned the publication of cartoons of the Muslim prophet as an "open provocation," warning that it would not tolerate insults of Mohammed in the controversy over the post-attacks Charlie Hebdo issue.



"Freedom of the press does not mean freedom to insult," Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu told reporters in Ankara before heading for talks with EU leaders in Brussels.



His comments came day after leading Turkish daily Cumhuriyet and Turkish websites published cartoons featuring the prophet from the first issue of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo after the attack on its offices on Jan 7 that left 12 people dead.



The publications revived a controversy over freedom of speech in officially secular Turkey which has been run for over a decade by an Islamic-leaning government and pious Muslim Recep Tayyip Erdogan, first as premier and now president. "We do not allow any insult to the prophet in this country," Davutoglu said. "As the government, we cannot put side by side the freedom of press and the lowness to insult."



Davutoglu said people were sensitive about their religion in the overwhelmingly Muslim Turkey and could not be expected to show patience towards insults to the prophet. "If some print cartoons that insult the prophet - and this is the situation and there is a sensitivity in Turkey - it is a provocation ... it is an open provocation."



(The final statements again hint at the actual threat he is making. A provocation to something.

I'm not critiquing Turkey - it's an islamic country like Pukestan, though less of an islamic pardees - and the faithful can do whatever, including ban their own islamic media from publishing the cartoons of their puppet.

But it's better for the EU if Turkey were kept out of the EU, plus the question remains: why has the Indian response over the whole incident been to behave like Turkey - by christomedia - and like Pukestan by islamaniacs? A: Because of the power of christoislamania in India, which is still heavily entrenched in the christomedia.)



'PROTECT THE HONOUR'



He said Turkey had squarely condemned the Paris attacks that killed 17 people in total but would fight with equal vehemence against insults to the prophet. "We are determined to protect the honour of the prophet the same way as we are determined in our stance against terrorism in Paris ... It is not correct to link this to the freedom of the press."

(That last line is practically what journalists of India's christomedia said.)



A Turkish court on Wednesday ordered a block on access to websites featuring the latest cover of Charlie Hebdo, after a petition from a single lawyer claiming that the printing of the cartoon had the potential to endanger the public order.

(Oh, like in India? And India isn't even officially a monotheistic country yet.)



Charlie Hebdo's new cover, which sold out at news stands across France, contains a caricature of the Prophet Mohammed - depicted with a tear in his eye, under the headline "All is forgiven" in French and holding a sign saying "Je suis Charlie" (I am Charlie).



The pull-out edition of Cumhuriyet did not include the controversial front cover but a small version of the cartoon featuring the prophet was included twice inside the newspaper to illustrate columns by commentators on the subject. Employees at the newspaper said their telephones did not stop ringing throughout the day and they received death threats.



Cumhuriyet, founded in 1924 at the behest of the founder of modern Turkey Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, considers itself to be a staunch upholder of the secular values he championed and which the opposition now fears Erdogan is eroding. Many Muslims consider images of the prophet, not least ones satirising him, to be blasphemous under Islam.



The new issue has already caused controversy within the Islamic world, raising fears of a repeat of the violent 2006 protests over the cartoons of Mohammed printed in Danish daily Jyllands-Posten.



Dozens of Muslims staged an angry protest against the paper in Istanbul, brandishing slogans like "Our dear Prophet, don't be upset, Muslims are with you" and "Cumhuriyet will be brought to account".



Cairo's Al-Azhar university, Sunni Islam's most prestigious centre of learning, had warned that new Mohammed cartoons in Charlie Hebdo will only serve to "stir up hatred" while there was also an angry reaction from Iran and Islamic State (IS) militants.



- AFP/ec

4. In not yet islamised Europe

where islam is still a minority - and doesn't have Indian christomedia at its side - and so islam doesn't want to get booted out before their demographic jihad is successfully completed.



E.g. Germany.

Where the anti-islamic "far-right" rallies featuring mostly christian conservatives including neo-nazis has been growing in numbers with each gathering convened. This has alarmed the increasingly leftist "centre" christian democratic party, so that Angela Merkel has decided to rally with the islamics.



In a typical case of taqiyyah, islamaniacs in Germany decide they are anti-terrorism - whereas in islamic majority places like Pukestan to even Turkey - they make their true views known. For the occasion, German Turks have similarly diverged from the opinion of their relatives in Turkey and decided not to make themselves too conspicuous and thereby exacerbate their islamic presence's unpopularity just now:

bbc.com/news/world-europe-30798534

13 January 2015 Last updated at 16:16 ET



German leaders attend Muslim community rally





The BBC's Jenny Hill: "It's been described as a rally for tolerance"

Continue reading the main story

Paris attacks





German Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Joachim Gauck have attended a Berlin vigil organised by Muslim groups to promote tolerance and religious freedom in the country.



Organisers say the event aimed to condemn the Paris attacks and show solidarity with the victims.



They are also responding to the recent "anti-Islamisation" rallies staged by the Pegida organisation across Germany.



The group's latest rally in Dresden drew a record crowd of 25,000.



Large anti-Pegida demonstrations took place in other German cities on Monday.

'Terrorism, not in our name'



President Gauck addressed the vigil at the Brandenburg Gate, saying: "We are all Germany."



He added: "Germany has become more diverse through immigration - religiously, culturally and mentally. This diversity has made our country successful, interesting and likeable."



Aiman Mazyek, head of the German Council of Muslims, told the crowd: "We stand together for a Germany that is open to the world, with a big heart, which honours freedom of opinion, of the press and of religion."

Members of German social democratic party SPD holds a banner displaying a crossed swastika and reading "Berlin against Nazis" during a rally to protest against Germany's anti-Islamisation movement "Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the Occident" PEGIDA, on 12 January 2015 near the Chancellery in Berlin Protesters in Germany marched against the "anti-Islamisation" group Pegida on Monday



The event was shown live on German television in a special broadcast entitled "Germany is Charlie".



Senior figures from across the political spectrum took part along with Christian leaders and representatives from Germany's Central Jewish Council.



The Central Council of Muslims in Germany and the Turkish community in Berlin have called the event: "We Muslims say: Let's stand by each other. Terrorism, not in our name."

So German muslims' line of taqiyyah is to declare that the jihadi terrorist attacks are "not in their name". Their brethren in their homelands have made it clear that it is in their name, in the name of their "dear prophet/puppet" and in the name of islam.





Meanwhile, Europe - and certainly parts of Germany - is getting closer and closer to swinging extreme right.

In Dresden, an Erithtrean muslim was murdered by racist neonazis who planted their hakenkreuz/hooked cross symbol.



And the Pegida rallies are growing in size. Of course the UK Guardian paper - being communist ("leaning" to be polite) - is still so "anti-fascist" that anything in the centre is also too far-right for them and hence automatically disparaged and linked back to the murder of the Erithrean:



theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/15/pegida-dresden-eritrean-refugee-murder-far-right-germany



The Independent is only slightly less to the left than the guardian and so echoes of a more honest picture emerge, even though the title - that all or even many or most in the pegida movement are against all immigrants - is still a known falsehood:



independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pegida-movements-marches-attract-thousands-as-hatred-of-islam-and-immigrants-sweeps-across-germany-in-the-wake-of-paris-attacks-9978543.html

There have been conflicting accounts about the attitudes and backgrounds of Pegida’s supporters. They are said to include both convinced neo-Nazis and impoverished pensioners who feel that they are the losers of Germany’s 1990 reunification.



Supporters of the Pegida movement wave German flags during their protest in Dresden, Germany, on Monday Supporters of the Pegida movement wave German flags during their protest in Dresden, Germany, on Monday (Getty)



However, a study conducted by Dresden’s Technical University concluded, alarmingly, that the average Pegida protester was well-educated and middle-class. They attended protests because they were “dissatisfied with politics”, according to the study.

A less knee-jerk, hence more honest account of the various sides to the Pegida movement is given by IBtimes, indicating that it is even less left-leaning. And it admits that - like the crazed Norwegian murderer from some years back, Anders Breivik, edge - much of the Pegida movement is christian.



ibtimes.com/dresdens-pegida-movement-how-germanys-anti-muslim-protesters-are-using-charlie-hebdo-1782442

Dresden's PEGIDA Movement: How Germany's Anti-Muslim Protesters Are Using Charlie Hebdo To Recruit Followers

By Dennis Lynch @neato_itsdennis on January 14 2015 2:25 PM



Pegida supporters wore black arm bands in solidarity with France and the victims of the Charlie Hebdo massacre, a move that many criticized as trying to capitalize on a tragedy. Reuters/Fabrizio Bensch



A growing anti-Muslim movement in Germany is using the Charlie Hebdo massacre to recruit followers in an effort that has alarmed German leaders and raised questions about the country's tolerance for non-European immigrants. What's unclear is whether Pegida (a German acronym for Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West) will be able to win over mainstream followers and cement its status among Germany's many political groups focused on immigration amid the growing anti-Muslim backlash spreading across Europe since last week's terror attacks in Paris.



Pegida held its largest rally to date Monday, less than a week after the fatal shooting at Charlie Hebdo's Paris office, with more than 25,000 people marching across Dresden to protest Muslim immigrants in Germany. That marked an increase of more than 7,000 from the group's previous rally the week before. Pegida's growing popularity comes as nearly all of Germany’s main political parties, including Angela Merkel’s conservative Christian Democratic Union, have shifted toward the left over the last six election cycles, according to a 2013 WZB Berlin Social Research Center study. That has left many in overwhelmingly conservative Dresden, in the formerly Communist east, feeling like they have lost their political voice, something Pegida has seized on.



“In the next few weeks and months, they’re going to try to build a legitimate movement,” said Alexander Clarkson, a lecturer in German and European Studies at King’s College in London. “They are going to motivate a lot of people who might feel that if they don’t go out on the street then they’ll slowly get pushed out of the political spectrum. But if they don’t win now, I think this will sort of be the Alamo for them. It’s their last shot.”



The Pegida rally Monday drew all kinds of people, with businessmen and families marching down the streets of Dresden alongside known activists of the National Democratic Party, the far-right, allegedly neo-Nazi party that led similar marches in the 1990s. Many protesters were adamant that they did not support Nazis, but had legitimate concerns that the political establishment hadn't answered over Germany’s growing immigrant population.



“If you look at a lot of the people at Pegida rallies, they look like normal, everyday people. That tells you that there is some deeper malaise underneath all this,” said Dr. Henning Meyer, editor-in-chief of the progressive journal Social Europe and a research associate at the London School of Economics. “It’s a wider section of the population that feels alienated and insecure, that the media doesn’t report things properly, that politicians don’t take them seriously and that political correctness means the real debates aren’t had.”



Germany is the second most popular destination in the world for immigrants behind the United States. Roughly 1.2 million people emigrated to Germany in 2013, and many Germans, including Merkel, have expressed concern that immigrants are coming to take advantage of the country's generous welfare programs. Instability in recent years has pushed hundreds of thousands of people from war-torn Syria, Iraq and across the region to apply for asylum in Germany. Last year, 180,000 applied, up 57 percent from 2013, according to Reuters.



Pegida was founded in October 2014 in Dresden by 41-year-old businessman Lutz Bachmann after he witnessed a clash between supporters and opponents of the Kurdistan Worker’s Party, a separatist rebel group banned in Turkey. His Pegida colleague Kathrin Oertel has said immigrants must not be allowed to import foreign conflicts into Germany.



Many Pegida protesters stress that all immigrants are welcome, but only under the condition that they assimilate into German culture and do not abuse Germany’s liberal immigration policies. “We want to keep our culture, to keep our traditions, to keep our Christian values,” Pegida spokesman Udo Ulfkotte told RT.



Bachmann's first rally in October drew only 350 people, but the crowds have grown exponentially with each week. As the group became more more visible, Germans demanded their national leaders respond. Facing widespread backlash, conservative leaders rushed to denounce the rallies, leaving Pegida with little mainstream backing. At one recent anti-Pegida demonstration, more than 22,000 people protested the group's anti-Muslim views. In Berlin, Merkel joined a Muslim solidarity rally this week, telling the crowd that "hatred of foreigners, racism and extremism have no place in our country."



Dresden has long been an epicenter for far-right groups in Germany, beginning soon after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, when many East Germans were left jobless and adrift during reunification and the transition to capitalism. At the time, rallies led by the National Democratic Party drew thousands to the streets, but Dresden’s politicians eventually pulled their support for the movement after business leaders complained.



Clarkson, who grew up in Hanover, Germany, recalled the clashes in the 1990s between the left and right-wingers in Leipzig, a former East German city 50 miles away from Dresden. The leftists prevailed, Leipzig has been generally liberal ever since, he said. He suspects many of Pegida’s now-middle-aged followers are the same right-wing youth who felt alienated after the NDP fell out of favor. He predicted the tide will likely eventually turn against Pegida, too.



“I think a lot of people in Dresden are getting embarrassed by this,” he said.

In time, Europe will do one of 3 things:

- kick out islam, OR

- islamise, OR

- neutralise islam: de-programming islamaniacs and secularising them [if there is enough time], or - as was reported in the rajeev2004 blog in recent weeks - AmeriKKKan cults will descend to convert Europe's islamics to christomania (ultimately the same thing as being in islamania: converts to christomania tend to be fundies and try to thwart teaching of evolution in schools, etc, and pose a threat to agnosticism and atheism and freethinking and free speech in Europe)