<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Those who gain from "organizing" the poor fishermen on the TN coast to agitate against anything that might actually improve their lives and bring them opportunity.
Here it is!
[...]
AID-INDIA. aka ALLAHS FOR INDIA'S DESTRUCTION
JOIN THE PROTEST! SUPPORT THE COMMUNIST REVOLUTION! PARROT WHAT THE COMMUNISTS SAY! :
The Commies and the LTTE have been wanting to cause trouble in this region and delay this project for decades. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Are you really arguing now for "islamics, communists and christos (LTTE) are opposed to the SSCP so Hindus should quit supporting preservation of Sethu?" <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo-->
According to your logic, if I were to see a christian donating to a 'Save the Panda' effort, I should ask the collectors to give me back the money I had donated.
What do I care that christoislamicommunists have whatever reasons to coincidentally be supporting the same cause: that of preventing the government from proceeding with their current config for the SSCP? (LTTE and AID would be opposing all configurations I think.) It doesn't in any way negate or reduce how badly I want the govt to stop in its designs against Ramar Sethu.
Christoislamicommunist meddling in this should not matter to other Hindus either. Hindus should oppose this project as it now stands, because the target is Ramar Sethu - it should be of concern to us for that reason.
Even if there were no ecological questions, even if it would have no impact on fishermen and even if it were not going to contribute in reducing casualty during tsunamis - it doesn't matter. Ramar Sethu ought to be preserved because it is of immense importance to Hindus.
Christoislamicommunists will always do what they want, their plans might or might not align with what we wish to do - but their (non-)involvement in anything should not stop us from pursuing matters pertaining to our own interest.
You keep questioning why the BJP or various Hindu orgs are listing different reasons for preserving the Sethu. I've told you why: in the hope against hope that any one of these reasons may appeal to the government and save it.
But am now wondering why you keep listing different reasons each time for <i>not</i> saving the Sethu, with only the latest being: 'the islamics and commies at AID and LTTE are doing it, so we shouldn't'.
Here it is!
[...]
AID-INDIA. aka ALLAHS FOR INDIA'S DESTRUCTION
JOIN THE PROTEST! SUPPORT THE COMMUNIST REVOLUTION! PARROT WHAT THE COMMUNISTS SAY! :
The Commies and the LTTE have been wanting to cause trouble in this region and delay this project for decades. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Are you really arguing now for "islamics, communists and christos (LTTE) are opposed to the SSCP so Hindus should quit supporting preservation of Sethu?" <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo-->
According to your logic, if I were to see a christian donating to a 'Save the Panda' effort, I should ask the collectors to give me back the money I had donated.
What do I care that christoislamicommunists have whatever reasons to coincidentally be supporting the same cause: that of preventing the government from proceeding with their current config for the SSCP? (LTTE and AID would be opposing all configurations I think.) It doesn't in any way negate or reduce how badly I want the govt to stop in its designs against Ramar Sethu.
Christoislamicommunist meddling in this should not matter to other Hindus either. Hindus should oppose this project as it now stands, because the target is Ramar Sethu - it should be of concern to us for that reason.
Even if there were no ecological questions, even if it would have no impact on fishermen and even if it were not going to contribute in reducing casualty during tsunamis - it doesn't matter. Ramar Sethu ought to be preserved because it is of immense importance to Hindus.
Christoislamicommunists will always do what they want, their plans might or might not align with what we wish to do - but their (non-)involvement in anything should not stop us from pursuing matters pertaining to our own interest.
You keep questioning why the BJP or various Hindu orgs are listing different reasons for preserving the Sethu. I've told you why: in the hope against hope that any one of these reasons may appeal to the government and save it.
But am now wondering why you keep listing different reasons each time for <i>not</i> saving the Sethu, with only the latest being: 'the islamics and commies at AID and LTTE are doing it, so we shouldn't'.