Hitler the trendy tyrant
German dictator no pariah to some in India, the Tribune's Kim Barker reports
By Kim Barker
Tribune's South Asia correspondent
Published December 21, 2006
KHARGHAR, India -- When an Adolf Hitler-themed restaurant opened its doors in a suburb of cosmopolitan Mumbai in August, many were horrified. The restaurant, Hitlers' Cross, changed its name a week later to Cross Cafe, but it is hardly the only example of how some Indians view Hitler and his legacy.
Hindu fundamentalist groups praise Hitler's leadership skills. A college poll a few years ago showed he was perceived as an ideal leader. Books and videos of him are top sellers. Most patrons prefer to call Cross Cafe by its previous name. Plates and cups still bear the Hitlers' Cross logo, with a Nazi swastika in place of the "O."
"We call it `Hitler' only," said Ashish Anant, 18, an aeronautics college student who likes to come to the cafe with friends. "We say, `Let's go to Hitler.' It's a trendy name. It's different."
It's not clear why Hitler is popular in some circles. Some experts say it's because of a belief that Indians were the original Aryan race. Others say it's because Hitler used the traditional Hindu good-luck symbol of the swastika, rotating it slightly. Those who believe strongly in the caste system of India also may like Hitler's eugenics and race beliefs.
Any praise for Hitler is not reflected in national policy. India has strong ties with Israel and views it as an ally in the war on terror. And Jewish and non-Jewish Indians were horrified by Hitlers' Cross. Daniel Zohar Zonshine, the Israel consul general in Mumbai, looked visibly upset when talking about the portrayal of Hitler in India, especially Hitlers' Cross. He said he thinks the owners wanted the free publicity that comes with such controversy.
Educating the public
The consulate has tried to educate Indians about Hitler, sending a Holocaust photograph exhibit and education materials last year to the western state of Gujarat, where government textbooks have praised Hitler. The Israeli Consulate will bring a Holocaust survivor and artist to Mumbai to talk to Indian audiences next month.
"It's not an Israeli issue," said Zonshine, adding that World War II was not ingrained in the DNA of India as it was in that of Europe or Israel. "It's not a Jewish issue. It's a humanitarian issue."
Joshua Reuben, 29, who belongs to India's small Jewish community, said he was offended by the restaurant but did not blame the owners.
"They probably haven't thought about hurting anybody's feelings," he said.
Interviews with many young Indians indicated that they had little idea of what Hitler actually did and that it did not really matter. They described Hitler as "cool" or "trendy." They did not know details of the Holocaust.
"I don't know much," admitted Puneet Sabhlok, 22, one of the co-founders of Hitlers' Cross, which serves only one marginally German item, German chocolate cake.
"He was a dictator," added co-founder Shakir Siddiqui, 27. "Gas chambers and all."
Hitler is glorified in other ways. A poll of 400 students from the country's most prestigious colleges by a leading Indian newspaper in 2002 found that Hitler was their third most requested ideal leader of India, behind independence leader Mahatma Gandhi and the country's then-Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee.
A pizza and cake chain in New Delhi, A Slice of Italy, sells a cake called "one for the Hitler," featuring Hitler's face. Last year the cake was sold with a swastika on the cap and was described as a children's cake over the phone. Last month there was no swastika.
"It's not common, but it's exciting, madam," a worker at the pizza chain told one woman who asked about the cake in November. "Order it."
`Hitler, the Supremo'
In Gujarat, textbooks have praised Hitler's leadership abilities, fascism and the Nazi movement. Until recently, state social studies textbooks have featured chapters on "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism." The textbooks have been changed slightly this year but still barely mention the Holocaust.
This is the same state where Hindu-led riots led to the deaths of more than 1,000 Muslims in the spring of 2002. Several investigations blamed the state government, led by a Hindu-right political party, for permitting the riots.
Bal Thackeray, the founder of Shiv Sena, a Hindu fundamentalist party based in Mumbai, has openly praised Hitler and said he was willing to wipe out troublemaking Muslims. Shiv Sena's secretary, Anil Desai, said Thackeray liked Hitler's leadership abilities, not his attempts to exterminate the Jews.
Thackeray likes "the way Hitler pushed the things in his time," Desai said.
Hitler's autobiography, "Mein Kampf," flies off the shelves of many bookstores. The Bandra branch of Crossword, a major bookstore chain in the Mumbai area, sells 35 copies a week.
At the Rhythm House in downtown Mumbai, one of the city's oldest and most popular video stores, the documentary "Hitler a Career" is sold in the video section for children.
"Why are people buying it? Because they like him," store clerk Maqbool Sayed said. "If it was up to me, I would hide these. I wouldn't put them out at all."
This is in regards to your hate filled article "Hitler the trendy tyrant". Let's start by saying that Hitler was a white German who would gladly have killed all Indians if he had half a chance. In fact when Jews fled the horrendous antisemitism of Europe, they found a safe haven in India. Hindus and Jews have always got along well. The same cannot of said of Germans and Jews or Europeans and Jews.
Statements like "Those who believe strongly in the caste system of India also may like Hitler's eugenics and race beliefs. " comes out of ignorance. The word caste is a Portuguese word that does not accurately reflect the tribal diversity of India. The Aryan race theories were created by white British imperialists who wanted Indians to feel inferior about themselves, and to credit their cultural achievements to outsiders.
In summary, the whole Hitler issue is an internal issue of the European race. Indians are not responsible for what happened to Jews, and in fact Indians and Jews have had an excellent relationship for hundreds of years.
<!--QuoteBegin-agnivayu+Dec 22 2006, 12:03 PM-->QUOTE(agnivayu @ Dec 22 2006, 12:03 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Let's start by saying that Hitler was a white German who would gladly have killed all Indians if he had half a chance. [right][snapback]62344[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Europeans and Americans, when talk about holocaust, have only Jewish victims in mind. In fact Nazis did exterminate hundreds of thousands of India-origin Gypsies of East Europe along with Jews, classifying them impure blood.
Isn't current Pope ex-party member of Hitler's brown shirts?
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Why are people buying it? Because they like him," store clerk Maqbool Sayed said. "If it was up to me, I would hide these. I wouldn't put them out at all."
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The poor shop keeper has to put his profits ahead of his ideals. Blame it on the consumer while laughing all the way to the bank.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Hitler's autobiography, "Mein Kampf," flies off the shelves of many bookstores. The Bandra branch of Crossword, a major bookstore chain in the Mumbai area, sells 35 copies a week.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Trivia question: Last year which country sold the most copies of 'Mein Kampf'?
No googling for answer please.
It is funny but there are many young Indians, mostly college going kids, on orkut with pictures of Hitler in their profile. This fascination for Hitler cuts across political boundaries.
12-29-2006, 09:45 AM (This post was last modified: 12-29-2006, 10:16 AM by Husky.)
Kim Barker's yap track:<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Hindu fundamentalist groups praise hitler's leadership skills. A college poll a few years ago showed he was perceived as an ideal leader. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Interesting. Is waf-waf-Barker referring to the Times of India 2002 'poll' on how 17% of students at colleges in Mumbai voted hitler as some kind of ideal leader?
Ignore the dubiousness of the christo TOI poll, and give it some credence for the moment. (But see also http://www.prashantkothari.com/archives/2003_07.html - which unfortunately does not expand on the matter.)
Now how did she equate 'Indian colleges' with a general slander on <i>Hindu</i> opinion?
Either on IF or on IIDB (Internet infidels) or - less likely - another forum long ago, I read an Indian girl's post on what the TOI poll concealed: the listing of the colleges themselves. About 10 or so colleges were listed and as anyone with half a brain can expect, most of these had very christian sounding names.
I spent quite a few hours today trying to track that elusive page down. No luck. Instead I have had to content myself with what seems a shorter list of college names. Still the sample is indicative of what I had seen. I found it by sheer coincidence, as the html itself is curiously broken (even if the page loads and displays) and that's probably why it does not turn up in google in a direct search.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/artic...382342.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>hitler as Hero: Society Without a Moral Compass</b>
A recent poll in this newspaper of young students in elite institutions across the country revealed a startling finding â 17 per cent favoured Adolf hitler as the kind of leader India ought to have.
Ahead of him, paradoxically, Mahatma Gandhi, the choice of 23 per cent and Atal Behari Vajpayee, 20 per cent. Does the placement of hitler, above Subhas Bose, Abraham Lincoln and Nelson Mandela mean anything? Is it an indicator of a moral vacuity of the students surveyed from colleges like St Stephen's and Lady Shri Ram, Delhi, St Xavier's Mumbai, Presidency College Kolkata, Mount Carmel and Christ College, Bangalore?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Now, correct me if I'm wrong. There's quite a few decidedly christian schools in there. Then there's Presidency college which sounds at least colonial. And <i>Lady</i> Shri Ram? Am I missing something. Rama was a male as every Hindu knows. And why the colonial-sounding 'Lady'? Is it a secular school with a pseudo-Hindu name?
Yes, Kim Barker would do well to expand on the poll she so briefly mentions. It seems the Indian (religious-affiliation unknown) students brainwashed by the Christians and seculars in these christo-influenced schools are confused enough to praise the christo hitler.
And can we have the individual poll results grouped by college, please? What was hitler's ranking in the Christo schools? And was he ranked <i>anywhere</i> at all in the Hindu schools (if any) tested? This would be an interesting bit of information wouldn't it - for all, but those seeking the truth. So why was it neglected?
Now, the next thing for an investigative journalist to do (that rules out Kim no-nose-for-the-scent Barker) is to check out whether the looneys owning that 'hitler' restaurant and making those hitler items are actually Hindus or only secularists educated at such schools or are crypto-christos still holding onto their Hindu names.
Anti-semitism and hitler-admiration is after all a christoislamic tendency. It's hard to pin that one on us, when we're possibly the only nation where the majority is whole-heartedly rooting for Israel (it's another matter that our pro-christoislamic communist government only grudgingly recognises the Jewish state).
But to Kim Barker and her editors, it seems that Indian colleges become 'Hindu(tva) centres' if would-be polls like this give out shocking and sensationalist results.
I have a question, how come this story - with so many coincidendally connecting dots - has made the news? The vague poll from 2002, the very recent news on that pathetic restaurant which made international rounds - it's all so miraculous.
Why does this beat out other stories? And why does it all seem so convenient and terribly contrived? In a nation of nigh on a billion people, a few psecoolar psychos are enough to blame the Hindu masses?
Surprise. Shock. It's already posted on communalism.blogspot of course and the trigger-happy forum for American christos at freerepooblic, and a few islamic sites besides.
Is someone paying greedy p-secoolar people to set up 'hitler' themed restaurants and items just so these things make the headlines and can add a new dimension (anti-semitism/pro-fascism) to a spiel about 'India's alarming rate of escalating 'Hindutva' ' (though there's nothing Hindu about the events Kim Barker lists). Ahead of elections too. Maybe they hope to flesh it out some more just before the BJP takes the stand to make a speech.
Hopefully by that time, we'll have prepared a list of all the christo schools who voted hitler into 'ideal leader'. And a list of all the budding neo-nazi christian centres in the US who believe they are Oryan christos following the Oryan jeebus. Now that's something that can easily be substantiated, and for which copious evidence can be given. No need for a vague article by journalist-wannabees like Barker to put that info out with the evening newspaper.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Those who believe strongly in the caste system of India also may like hitler's eugenics and race beliefs.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Bad move on Kim Barker's part. Now I have to retaliate and mention her own cherished terrorist beliefs which she shares with hitler. The caste system has nothing to do with hitler, the organisation of his military or his visions. The good ole christo US of A was already going strong with their eugenics programme when hitler got inspired by them. So Barker need look no further than her own Good-Christian backyard: http://www.bethuneinstitute.org/documents/...connection.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Throughout the pre-war period, there was considerable influence of American eugenics policy on Nazi racial policy.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Next. The organisation of hitler's troops was directly copied from Church hierarchy as hitler himself stated. And the church proudly responded - http://freetruth.50webs.org/Appendix2.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Bishop of Berlin in his speech: "Permit me to compare our sisters with the SA!" (a paramilitary Nazi troop). <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->From vague recollections of history class, SA = schutzabteilung, literally 'defense division' - one of the nazi military depts.
And let's not forget the christo feudal (casta) society, which was rigid and unforgiving:
(1) Aristocracy from where the knights came. Ze 'blue blood' was inherited and only the gawd-appointed king could ever appoint a non-aristocrat to this class.
(2) Geistlichen: the christian priests - all those in power in the church were also from the artistocracy. Peasant priests were kept even more illiterate and did the menial duties for the church.
(3) Serfs, or to put it more politely: the peasantry. They were no better off than slaves. They did not own the land they toiled on and could be killed whenever the upper casta aristocrats/priests willed it.
It is clear that the terrible christo casta system of hitler's own christo-Germany and christo-Europe was his great inspiration. Again, Kim Barker ought to look in her own christo-ancestral back-yard.
Hindu society bears no similarities to her terrorist religion which inspired the fervent christo hitler.
As for racism, well, that's a wholly christoislamic thing. ( http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4b.htm ) We know slavery of Africans was entirely christian in origin in christian Europe, and of islamic origin in the Jihadi empire.
So there's no need for Kim to try and shift the blame onto people who have had nothing to do with this or anything like it.
One thing is clear from reading her ... writing. Besides her beloved religion, Barker has more things in common with hitler: hitler also believed people would buy big lies. Although it works on gullible christos, who are only all too willing to believe fascism did not derive from christianity, it's wasted on us.
The only good thing we can say about hitler is that he's dead.
Did I just gloat over a dead man? Yupp. And I'd do it again in a flash.
<b>EDIT:</b>
More brazen comedy. In the same TOI page ( http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/artic...82342.cms) that states Hitler was voted in by 17% of the students surveyed in predominantly christian schools and questions:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Is it an indicator of a moral vacuity of the students surveyed from colleges like St Stephen's and Lady Shri Ram, Delhi, St Xavier's Mumbai, Presidency College Kolkata, Mount Carmel and Christ College, Bangalore?
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->the writer makes a huge leap, thinking a few paragraphs of separation will make us forget the above, and writes:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->It is unlikely that the students chose Hitler as a figure to admire because they are moral monsters. Their problem is that they have been fed on a diet, some of it emanating in groups or people linked to the <i>sangh parivar</i>, that Hitler represented efficiency, discipline and nationalism, commodities allegedly in short supply in India. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Umm, the sangh parivar is not giving them their education. It's not the one teaching them history, hitler and stuff. And for the Hindu children, it's not their Hindu parents either, most of whom might not know anything about hitler.
It's the christo (or p-sec) schools. And it follows that that's where their opinions on hitler is emanating.
12-29-2006, 11:06 AM (This post was last modified: 12-29-2006, 11:08 AM by Hauma Hamiddha.)
It is important that more Indians known about our own "Hitler" the British tyrant Winston Churchill. Indians need to highlight the fact the Churchill was no better than Hitler and as relevant to us as Hitler might be to the Jews. Other than that this article is merely a part of the large trend in the West to associate Hindus with Nazis and thereby smear them. After all Hindus are THE real Aryans.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Trivia question: Last year which country sold the most copies of 'Mein Kampf'?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
My take was UK but after google I was shocked, it was Turkey.
I bought my copy in Vienna (Austria), yes this book still give stares in some part of Europe
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Yes, Kim Barker would do well to expand on the poll she so briefly mentions. It seems the Indian (religious-affiliation unknown) students brainwashed by the Christians and seculars in these christo-influenced schools are confused enough to praise the christo hitler.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Admiration for Hitler in India has little to do with Christianity or Secularism. People admire him for making Germany a superpower after WWII, I have come across Hitler supporters from all kinds of background. Surprisingly, many of these people are ardent supporters of Israel as well. It seems these confused folks admire the strong "triumph of the will" image of Hitler.
Anyway, as H^2 has correctly pointed out, there is no need for Indians to be apologetic in any case. Gora Log admire Winston Churchill, who reveled in the death of millions of Indians in the Bengal famine, Nixon supported Pakistan when it was committing genocide in Bangladesh.
12-31-2006, 09:03 PM (This post was last modified: 12-31-2006, 09:03 PM by agnivayu.)
I knew a German-American who said that Hitler did many good things such as the rapid industrialization of Germany. This is a true statement, but also many white people do like Hitler for some of the things he did. White's just like Kim Barker.
Most White people have also said things like Jews have too much control of the financial and political system in the U.S.. On the street level it's actually quite obvious that most of the anti-semitic sentiment is coming from the West and Islamic world. Not surprising at all that India was considered a safe haven for Jews throughout history.
<!--QuoteBegin-agnivayu+Dec 31 2006, 10:33 AM-->QUOTE(agnivayu @ Dec 31 2006, 10:33 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--> Not surprising at all that India was considered a safe haven for Jews throughout history.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
In fact Hindus need to publicize to the Israelis that while Hindu Rajas gave them a safe haven, the one who massacred the Jews in India were the Portuguese.
It is true that some Germans continue to see Hitler as having done the country some good. But I doubt they will openly state this. Secondly, these Germans only vaguely realize that this had little to do with Hitler per say, but more to do with the German scientific efflorescence.
<!--QuoteBegin-Mudy+Dec 29 2006, 01:53 AM-->QUOTE(Mudy @ Dec 29 2006, 01:53 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Trivia question: Last year which country sold the most copies of 'Mein Kampf'?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
My take was UK but after google I was shocked, it was Turkey.
[right][snapback]62542[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The common anti-semitic views bind them together. If you read about creation of Baath party and middle east politics around 40s, it's not all that shocking to see why book's popular there.
01-27-2007, 10:53 PM (This post was last modified: 01-27-2007, 10:58 PM by Bodhi.)
<span style='color:red'><b>Nazis were Godless people : Vatican</b></span>
What was Hitler religion?
Praying after a rally in Vienna:
<img src='http://www.emperors-clothes.com/vatican/praying.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
after prayers leaving the Marine Church in Wilhelmshaven:
<img src='http://www.tenc.net/vatican/hchurch.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
Rallying in front of the Church of our Lady in Nuremberg, Sept. 1934.
<img src='http://www.tenc.net/vatican/ourlady.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
From, Mein Kampf:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->For the rest, the facts speak for themselves. The gentlemen who in 1924 suddenly discovered that the highest mission of the folkish movement was the struggle against 'Ultramontanism' did not break Ultramontanism, but tore apart the folkish movement. I must also lodge protest against any immature mind in the ranks of the folkish movement imagining that he can do what even a Bismarck could not do. It will always be the highest duty of the top leadership of the National Socialist movement to offer the sharpest opposition to any attempt to drive the National Socialist movement into such struggles, and immediately to remove the propagandists of such an intention from the ranks of the movement. And actually, by autumn, 1923, we succeeded entirely in this.
In the ranks of the movement, the most devout Protestant could sit beside the most devout Catholic, without coming into the slightest conflict with his religious convictions. <b>The mighty common struggle which both carried on against the destroyer of Aryan humanity had, on the contrary, taught them mutually to respect and esteem one another. </b>And yet, in these very years, the movement carried on the bitterest fight against the [Catholic] Center [Party], though never on religious, but exclusively on national, racial, and economic-political grounds. The results spoke in our favor, just as today they testify against the know-it-alls.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
01-28-2007, 10:23 AM (This post was last modified: 01-29-2007, 04:33 AM by Husky.)
<!--QuoteBegin-Bodhi+Jan 27 2007, 10:53 PM-->QUOTE(Bodhi @ Jan 27 2007, 10:53 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->(Thanks to Husky for sharing emperors-clothes URL)[right][snapback]63635[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->I was but an inbetweener. Came across that from a link that started at the old version of the site 'What they don't tell you about christoism' (now at http://freetruth.50webs.org/ ).
More pictures of the love for nazism borne by christian priests: http://foruns.clix.pt/geral/showflat.php?C...sb=5&o=0&part=3
Page starts with images of the catholic nazis ('ustashe') of Croatia and moves onto the very christian German nazis and shots of priests amidst them. Pics of hitler too.
Skim through the section: http://freetruth.50webs.org/A7d.htm#Ratlines
'The Vatican's Ratlines and Nazi funds: helping war criminals to escape justice'
With excerpts from a recent slew of news articles on the infamous Vatican's aid to nazis.
- http://freetruth.50webs.org/Appendix4.htm
very good article called <i>What is the Vatican hiding? The Vatican's Complicity in Genocide in Fascist Croatia - The Suppressed Chapter of Holocaust History</i>
by Barry Lituchy, 10 May 1998
As I recall, the author seemed to be a bit left-leaning (or maybe I'm confusing it with something else), but since no one generally ever bothered to write about this topic, I thoroughly approve of this article. Everyone should read it once.
02-01-2007, 05:23 AM (This post was last modified: 02-02-2007, 02:59 AM by Husky.)
It's ironic that the only German books on WWII that are allowed to be translated into the English language are the ones that do not discuss the christian collusion in the Holocaust. For instance, just found this:
<i>The Good Old Days: the Holocaust as Seen by Its Perpetrators and Bystanders</i> by <b>Ernst Klee</b>, Willi Dressen and Volker Reiss
And yet Klee's seminal works on exposing the Churches' involvement
* in actively murdering people with disabilities
* in tracking down all those with Jewish ancestry (amongst their own flocks) for the nazis
* in helping nazis escape after the war (this is the catholic church in particular)
- these works are not ever translated, at least I haven't found them to be.
The strategically planned silence continues outside Europe.
Post #7:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I bought my copy [of hitler's book] in Vienna (Austria), yes this book still give stares in some part of Europe<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Thought it was banned in Austria and several other W European countries, leastways it appeared to be banned before. Can't remember for certain, was very young back then.
Mudy, is your copy in German? <i>If so</i>, can you confirm whether only the word 'hakenkreuz' makes it appearance in it? That is, whether there is no occurrence of 'swastika'?
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Thought it was banned in Austria and several other W European countries, leastways it appeared to be banned before. Can't remember for certain, was very young back then.
Mudy, is your copy in German? If so, can you confirm whether only the word 'hakenkreuz' makes it appearance in it? That is, whether there is no occurrence of 'swastika'?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Mine is in English. I bought my copy from side shop.
Few people know that christians in Europe all supported the nazism of Adolf Hitler. In fact fascism was not something of Hitler, because it existed already during the colonial time. The idea of white supremacy is something that was not invented by Adolf Hitler, because whole Europe believed it during the period of colonialism and slavery. Nowaday the history books tells lies about this curious facts.
Hitler only wanted power and used the hate feelings toward Jews in whole Europe. All christian countries in Europe supported the massacre of the Jews during the time that Hitler came into power and did nothing.
The politics of Hitler were very simple and he only used old existing hate relations in a clever way. In fact he had some luck and used it to become the greatest dictator of European History.
The armies of Hitler also killed negroes, chinese, indians, gypsies, slavians, homosexuals, and handicapped people, so not only jews were killed. We must tell our children the truth about Hitler, so it will never happen again.
