Post 97:
That paper 'Call to muslims to seduce Sikh girls to islam' shows what a non-entity islamics consider women to be. Apparently islamics think women are stupider than animal females, the latter do a prodigious amount of checking that the males being considered have enough resources to support offspring.
So I really want to know, what woman would want to marry an islamic?
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->'Muslims are more attractive and intelligent than other people which should be helpful in the seduction process'<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--emo&:roll--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ROTFL.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='ROTFL.gif' /><!--endemo-->
(1) More attractive? Yeah, I see it now. It must be the thick monobrow, the bloodshot bulging terrorist eyes, and icky bushy beard which gives off that dangerous OBL vibe which women go nuts over, right? So really, what every woman wants is their own private j-hadi terrorist, whom one can't help immediately associating with the T-ban seen on the news beating up the unfortunate fully-covered Afghan women or executing them?
Even the shaven islamic men one can see on tv have a nasty angry look about them (possibly not all of them, but the ones I've seen in TV film adverts and pop songs in India do), as if they've been mistreated since childhood and are now carrying the bullying baton themselves.
But less said about the hysterical 'more attractive than other people' statement, the better.
(2) More intelligent? I'm going to have to let this one go, I might die of a laughing fit while trying to write something down. Certain that even the writers were laughing when they came up with this one. But they probably thought women (of whom they have such a low opinion) who read it will believe it, just 'cause of their say-so.
Their outline for how to go about 'seducing' women is spectacularly boorish at best. Methinks all women would prefer being beaten over the head with a club, caveman-wise, to being thus crudely 'courted' by islamis.
To think that they really consider that 50% of the human population is made up of complete nitwits. It says everything about islam and the kind of man it makes (and nothing about women, of course).
On the matter of the boorish faithful:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/070213/2/p/12eur.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Zawahri calls US troop increase doomed</b>
Al-Qaeda's second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahri said US President George W Bush's troop build-up in Iraq was a gamble bound to fail and criticised his Democrat rivals for not bringing any change in Washington's policy.
"(Bush's) addiction to gambling ... motivates him to continue to place losing bets until he goes completely bankrupt," the US private SITE Institute's web page quoted Zawahri as saying in an audio recording posted on the internet.
"Were the Americans to leave him alone, he would continue to send their forces to Iraq until the mujahideen kill the last one of their soldiers."
Bush has announced plans to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq to try to quell the unrelenting violence.
Democrats swept Republicans from power in Congress in November amid popular dissatisfaction with policies on Iraq.
The SITE Institute, a private US organisation that tracks militant statements, posted a 6,600-word English-language transcript of Zawahri's purported 41-minute web recording. It was not immediately possible to authenticate the statement.
Zawahri criticised the Democrats for not forcing Republican Bush's hand on Iraq.
"The people chose you (Democrats) due to your opposition to Bush's policy in Iraq, but it appears that you are marching with him to the same abyss, and it appears that you will take part with him in the defeat," Zawahri said.
Addressing the United States and Britain, the Egyptian militant cleric said: "With every delay you make in resorting to wise and realistic policies, your losses will increase."
Zawahri said the people of nations that took part in wars against Muslim nations could not be "absolved" of blame because they supported the leaders who made the decision to fight.
"You are not facing individuals or organisations, but the jihadist uprising of the angry ... Muslim nation," he said.
In his statement to mark the late January Islamic new year, Zawahri said one of the most important events of the past year had been an admission of failure by "the notorious liar" Bush.
The US-allied governments of Iraq and Afghanistan should think about their fate after US troops leave, he said.
"These traitors in Iraq and Afghanistan must face their inevitable fate, and face up to the inescapable facts. America ... is about to depart and abandon them, just as it abandoned their like in Vietnam," he said.
"If the mujahideen have ... broken the back of America, will its agents hold their own against them in the absence of America? If tanks and planes were of no help to America, what, for the traitors, will take the place of the foreign aid and backing?"
He also vowed reprisals against Arab and Muslim countries that supported the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
(Aaah. Good old christoislam: if you're not for them, they think you're against them, even if you are a christoislamic.)
"As for the states which colluded with the crusaders in their invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, they must reap their bitter harvest."
<b>Zawahri called on all Muslims to unite under the banner of an Islamic state rather than be split in Arab and other states.</b>
(Yet if all of them unite under AQ's suggestion, all muslims will be considered enemies in the war on terror.
If a muslim is for the war on terror (or inactive), he's considered against 'islamic state'. If he's for 'islamic state' (as directed by AQ), he's considered an enemy in the war on terror. You gotta love christoislamism's enforced dualism.)
<b>"I ask God ... to consolidate this state ... which will proceed to liberate Jerusalem," </b>he said.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That paper 'Call to muslims to seduce Sikh girls to islam' shows what a non-entity islamics consider women to be. Apparently islamics think women are stupider than animal females, the latter do a prodigious amount of checking that the males being considered have enough resources to support offspring.
So I really want to know, what woman would want to marry an islamic?
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->'Muslims are more attractive and intelligent than other people which should be helpful in the seduction process'<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--emo&:roll--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ROTFL.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='ROTFL.gif' /><!--endemo-->
(1) More attractive? Yeah, I see it now. It must be the thick monobrow, the bloodshot bulging terrorist eyes, and icky bushy beard which gives off that dangerous OBL vibe which women go nuts over, right? So really, what every woman wants is their own private j-hadi terrorist, whom one can't help immediately associating with the T-ban seen on the news beating up the unfortunate fully-covered Afghan women or executing them?
Even the shaven islamic men one can see on tv have a nasty angry look about them (possibly not all of them, but the ones I've seen in TV film adverts and pop songs in India do), as if they've been mistreated since childhood and are now carrying the bullying baton themselves.
But less said about the hysterical 'more attractive than other people' statement, the better.
(2) More intelligent? I'm going to have to let this one go, I might die of a laughing fit while trying to write something down. Certain that even the writers were laughing when they came up with this one. But they probably thought women (of whom they have such a low opinion) who read it will believe it, just 'cause of their say-so.
Their outline for how to go about 'seducing' women is spectacularly boorish at best. Methinks all women would prefer being beaten over the head with a club, caveman-wise, to being thus crudely 'courted' by islamis.
To think that they really consider that 50% of the human population is made up of complete nitwits. It says everything about islam and the kind of man it makes (and nothing about women, of course).
On the matter of the boorish faithful:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/070213/2/p/12eur.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Zawahri calls US troop increase doomed</b>
Al-Qaeda's second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahri said US President George W Bush's troop build-up in Iraq was a gamble bound to fail and criticised his Democrat rivals for not bringing any change in Washington's policy.
"(Bush's) addiction to gambling ... motivates him to continue to place losing bets until he goes completely bankrupt," the US private SITE Institute's web page quoted Zawahri as saying in an audio recording posted on the internet.
"Were the Americans to leave him alone, he would continue to send their forces to Iraq until the mujahideen kill the last one of their soldiers."
Bush has announced plans to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq to try to quell the unrelenting violence.
Democrats swept Republicans from power in Congress in November amid popular dissatisfaction with policies on Iraq.
The SITE Institute, a private US organisation that tracks militant statements, posted a 6,600-word English-language transcript of Zawahri's purported 41-minute web recording. It was not immediately possible to authenticate the statement.
Zawahri criticised the Democrats for not forcing Republican Bush's hand on Iraq.
"The people chose you (Democrats) due to your opposition to Bush's policy in Iraq, but it appears that you are marching with him to the same abyss, and it appears that you will take part with him in the defeat," Zawahri said.
Addressing the United States and Britain, the Egyptian militant cleric said: "With every delay you make in resorting to wise and realistic policies, your losses will increase."
Zawahri said the people of nations that took part in wars against Muslim nations could not be "absolved" of blame because they supported the leaders who made the decision to fight.
"You are not facing individuals or organisations, but the jihadist uprising of the angry ... Muslim nation," he said.
In his statement to mark the late January Islamic new year, Zawahri said one of the most important events of the past year had been an admission of failure by "the notorious liar" Bush.
The US-allied governments of Iraq and Afghanistan should think about their fate after US troops leave, he said.
"These traitors in Iraq and Afghanistan must face their inevitable fate, and face up to the inescapable facts. America ... is about to depart and abandon them, just as it abandoned their like in Vietnam," he said.
"If the mujahideen have ... broken the back of America, will its agents hold their own against them in the absence of America? If tanks and planes were of no help to America, what, for the traitors, will take the place of the foreign aid and backing?"
He also vowed reprisals against Arab and Muslim countries that supported the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
(Aaah. Good old christoislam: if you're not for them, they think you're against them, even if you are a christoislamic.)
"As for the states which colluded with the crusaders in their invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, they must reap their bitter harvest."
<b>Zawahri called on all Muslims to unite under the banner of an Islamic state rather than be split in Arab and other states.</b>
(Yet if all of them unite under AQ's suggestion, all muslims will be considered enemies in the war on terror.
If a muslim is for the war on terror (or inactive), he's considered against 'islamic state'. If he's for 'islamic state' (as directed by AQ), he's considered an enemy in the war on terror. You gotta love christoislamism's enforced dualism.)
<b>"I ask God ... to consolidate this state ... which will proceed to liberate Jerusalem," </b>he said.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->