What a confident news headline, seriously worrying:
<!--QuoteBegin-Naresh+Jan 28 2007, 04:44 AM-->QUOTE(Naresh @ Jan 28 2007, 04:44 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->[center]<b>Kashmir will be settled by March 2008, says Rao</b>[/center]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->âWe should not be hopeless about the situation as the present run of activities will bear <b>positive results, and Kashmir will be liberated</b> by February or March 2008, if not by December this year,â he added.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>âBut Pakistan is a determined nation, and we have some pluses about which I donât want to talk about.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->[right][snapback]63649[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Rao Sikander (Rao is a Hindu name isn't it, why is the islamoterrorist still keeping it?) knows something we don't. There was that other news article posted here about how Pak doesn't want to fight over Kashmir anymore.
Adding the two up: they want Kashmir, don't want to fight over it (don't need to is more like it), but are confident of getting it by March 2008 anyway.
Under the present anti-Indian, anti-Hindu government, can't help but think that what Sikander is hinting at is really the worst-case scenario turned into reality.
Sikander says Terroristan has some 'pluses' up its sleeve - guess it must be Sonia Gandhi and her Pak-born traitor-stooge Madmohan Singh. (Only pluses to Pakistan, to us they are the greatest minuses.) They could well be planning to give Kashmir away to Terroristan as some kind of progressive, secular peace-gesture by the 'magnanimous' Indian traitor Congress government. At that point, Arundhati Roy and the other pathbreakers for christoislamic terrorism in India will be cheering this as a Noble Peace Prize deserving action by Sonia and Mad (and they will duly get their Noble Peace Prize), the Pope will be invited to drop in for tea and will congratulate them for their peaceful means of settling the whole issue as well: What the Hindus could not solve, Christo Sonia and fake 'Sikh' Mad have wrapped up so easily and without bloodshed (without islamic bloodshed, that is; Hindu Kashmiris' blood is worth less than that of cockroaches, don't ya know?)
Pakistan will be congratulated for its (islamic) peace also: for realising, as early as Jan 2007, that they did not want to fight over Kashmir anymore.
The IBN-CNN and other christomedia will be cheering the whole hand-over as some kind of 'victory of Indians', in the same manner as the traitors (Shabana Azmi et al) insisted that an 'anti-communalist' march after the Mumbai bombs was some kind of show of our 'victory over terrorism'.
While the average Indian will be left speechless, those in the know in Terroristan will be nodding their heads in private and shaking each others hands, after which they'll update Teroristan's map to include Kashmir and then move their LOC to the border of the Mughalistan they've planned for ages. Then back to square 1: new islamic terrorist cells mushroom (already in preparation) trying to liberate 'Mughalistan' from India, requests for plebiscite at the UN for the poor Mughalistanis, international media lobbying, the ever-returning genocide and ethnic cleansing of Hindus, the christian media writing about the 'evil Indian army in Mughalistan' and what not.
Why - as gloomy as the above looks - does it nevertheless seem to be the way things are going?
<!--QuoteBegin-Naresh+Jan 28 2007, 04:44 AM-->QUOTE(Naresh @ Jan 28 2007, 04:44 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->[center]<b>Kashmir will be settled by March 2008, says Rao</b>[/center]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->âWe should not be hopeless about the situation as the present run of activities will bear <b>positive results, and Kashmir will be liberated</b> by February or March 2008, if not by December this year,â he added.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>âBut Pakistan is a determined nation, and we have some pluses about which I donât want to talk about.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->[right][snapback]63649[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Rao Sikander (Rao is a Hindu name isn't it, why is the islamoterrorist still keeping it?) knows something we don't. There was that other news article posted here about how Pak doesn't want to fight over Kashmir anymore.
Adding the two up: they want Kashmir, don't want to fight over it (don't need to is more like it), but are confident of getting it by March 2008 anyway.
Under the present anti-Indian, anti-Hindu government, can't help but think that what Sikander is hinting at is really the worst-case scenario turned into reality.
Sikander says Terroristan has some 'pluses' up its sleeve - guess it must be Sonia Gandhi and her Pak-born traitor-stooge Madmohan Singh. (Only pluses to Pakistan, to us they are the greatest minuses.) They could well be planning to give Kashmir away to Terroristan as some kind of progressive, secular peace-gesture by the 'magnanimous' Indian traitor Congress government. At that point, Arundhati Roy and the other pathbreakers for christoislamic terrorism in India will be cheering this as a Noble Peace Prize deserving action by Sonia and Mad (and they will duly get their Noble Peace Prize), the Pope will be invited to drop in for tea and will congratulate them for their peaceful means of settling the whole issue as well: What the Hindus could not solve, Christo Sonia and fake 'Sikh' Mad have wrapped up so easily and without bloodshed (without islamic bloodshed, that is; Hindu Kashmiris' blood is worth less than that of cockroaches, don't ya know?)
Pakistan will be congratulated for its (islamic) peace also: for realising, as early as Jan 2007, that they did not want to fight over Kashmir anymore.
The IBN-CNN and other christomedia will be cheering the whole hand-over as some kind of 'victory of Indians', in the same manner as the traitors (Shabana Azmi et al) insisted that an 'anti-communalist' march after the Mumbai bombs was some kind of show of our 'victory over terrorism'.
While the average Indian will be left speechless, those in the know in Terroristan will be nodding their heads in private and shaking each others hands, after which they'll update Teroristan's map to include Kashmir and then move their LOC to the border of the Mughalistan they've planned for ages. Then back to square 1: new islamic terrorist cells mushroom (already in preparation) trying to liberate 'Mughalistan' from India, requests for plebiscite at the UN for the poor Mughalistanis, international media lobbying, the ever-returning genocide and ethnic cleansing of Hindus, the christian media writing about the 'evil Indian army in Mughalistan' and what not.
Why - as gloomy as the above looks - does it nevertheless seem to be the way things are going?