What DNA Says About Aryan Invasion Theory -2

[G.Subramaniam]

<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+Nov 15 2009, 03:20 AM-->QUOTE(dhu @ Nov 15 2009, 03:20 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-G.Subramaniam+Nov 14 2009, 10:58 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(G.Subramaniam @ Nov 14 2009, 10:58 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Also in the Mittani texts, the language is pure sanskrit, no hint of Avestan
And the Mittani are in Syria, the other side of Iran

There is also no R1A1 among the greeks and italians

Meaning Avestan, Greek and Latin are not descended from R1A1 directly but more likely through a small elite newcomers
[right][snapback]102538[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Kurdistan is a major outpost of Indic R2 and L (also in Armenia). This probably correlates with Indic Mittani. An Indic contribution in the "Jewish" is probably related.

I think Italo-Celtic spread with r1b out of C Asia taking a more southern route through Anatolia (contra Talageri) or, alternatively, hugging the Black Sea northern coast. See the R1b map. R1a1 out of India correlates with Germanic (locus is Poland per Underhill 2009). Slavic is a later expansion along with main body of Iranians out of Gandhara, but may even be with the initial out-of-India R1a1 expansion.

J2 spread is pre-neolithic.

At any rate, it is all over for the grand theory.
[right][snapback]102543[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


What exactly is the grand theory ?