08-25-2006, 01:28 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Ravi Chaudhary+Aug 25 2006, 12:06 AM-->QUOTE(Ravi Chaudhary @ Aug 25 2006, 12:06 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Poster Dingvijay has referred to Rana sanga and the " memoirs of Babur" the baburnama
3) Perhaps I have missed it but nowhere can I see is the term 'rajput' used to describe him! He is descibed as Pagan.
Ravi Chaudhary
[right][snapback]56166[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://persian.packhum.org/persian/pf?fi...1052&ct=34
"The Rajput Princes, from Mewat to Udaipur, had joined in a confederacy, of which Rana Sanka, the Prince of Udaipur, was at the head."
Also look at the names of Rajput kings who were assembled against Babur: Hada is an ancient Chauhan rajput shakha. They are Prithviraj Chauhan's ancestors. Now I have seen both Gujjars and Jats claim that Prithviraj Chauhan was also a gujjar/jat. So do you have a substantial number of Hada Jats? (And do not give me it is same as Hooda). There are many lakh Rajput Hadas (kingdoms of Bundi and Kotah).
http://www.uq.net.au/~zzhsoszy/ips/misc/chauhan.html
Why is that gujjars and Jats are hell bent on claiming all rajput kings as Jats or Gujjars?
Does any rajput intermarry with a jat or a gujjar today? NO. Jat women just like gujjar women go and work in the fields. No rajput women does such activity. Rajputs and Jats/Gujjars are socially and culturally not the same people as is clear from these people not intermarrying with each other.
Just because Gujjars and Jats have similar surnames you have made the leap that they are the same people which is not true.
-Digvijay
3) Perhaps I have missed it but nowhere can I see is the term 'rajput' used to describe him! He is descibed as Pagan.
Ravi Chaudhary
[right][snapback]56166[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://persian.packhum.org/persian/pf?fi...1052&ct=34
"The Rajput Princes, from Mewat to Udaipur, had joined in a confederacy, of which Rana Sanka, the Prince of Udaipur, was at the head."
Also look at the names of Rajput kings who were assembled against Babur: Hada is an ancient Chauhan rajput shakha. They are Prithviraj Chauhan's ancestors. Now I have seen both Gujjars and Jats claim that Prithviraj Chauhan was also a gujjar/jat. So do you have a substantial number of Hada Jats? (And do not give me it is same as Hooda). There are many lakh Rajput Hadas (kingdoms of Bundi and Kotah).
http://www.uq.net.au/~zzhsoszy/ips/misc/chauhan.html
Why is that gujjars and Jats are hell bent on claiming all rajput kings as Jats or Gujjars?
Does any rajput intermarry with a jat or a gujjar today? NO. Jat women just like gujjar women go and work in the fields. No rajput women does such activity. Rajputs and Jats/Gujjars are socially and culturally not the same people as is clear from these people not intermarrying with each other.
Just because Gujjars and Jats have similar surnames you have made the leap that they are the same people which is not true.
-Digvijay