Date: 15 Jan 2015
Who did it: islamaniacs
Why: Hindus were celebrating Makara Sankranti
Where: Bharuch, Gujarat
Casualties: 3 dead, 10 injured - of unmentioned religious affiliation. But since the christomedia is silent, victims can readily be construed to be Hindu, since the names of any islamic dead would be emblazoned by christomedia and multiplied as Cedric Prakash did for the Godhra riots.
And as usual: Hindu religious sites and shops attacked/burned by the christoislamaniac minority
Form of christian support of the jihad: via christomedia, which speaks of "two communities clashing" again, clearly to conceal who the instigators were, and goes one step further by inverting victimhood/action to present the jihad as an islamaniac reaction (you know, the way christomedia always starts their storytelling about Godhra riots with the riots and not with the islamaniac jihadi burning of Hindus on a train, which led to the riots)
zeenews.india.com/news/gujarat/three-killed-in-communal-clashes-in-gujarats-bharuch-district_1530635.html
"Shops burnt down" by one community because another community celebrated Makara Sankranti such as by flying kites.
To demystify the christomedia's ongoing silencing of genocide of Hindus (and whitewashing of jihad): muslims are famous for burning shops and pelting stones whenever Hindus celebrate their festivals. Christoislamaniacs don't celebrate Makara Sankranti.
Who did it: islamaniacs
Why: Hindus were celebrating Makara Sankranti
Where: Bharuch, Gujarat
Casualties: 3 dead, 10 injured - of unmentioned religious affiliation. But since the christomedia is silent, victims can readily be construed to be Hindu, since the names of any islamic dead would be emblazoned by christomedia and multiplied as Cedric Prakash did for the Godhra riots.
And as usual: Hindu religious sites and shops attacked/burned by the christoislamaniac minority
Form of christian support of the jihad: via christomedia, which speaks of "two communities clashing" again, clearly to conceal who the instigators were, and goes one step further by inverting victimhood/action to present the jihad as an islamaniac reaction (you know, the way christomedia always starts their storytelling about Godhra riots with the riots and not with the islamaniac jihadi burning of Hindus on a train, which led to the riots)
zeenews.india.com/news/gujarat/three-killed-in-communal-clashes-in-gujarats-bharuch-district_1530635.html
Quote:Three killed in communal clashes in Gujarat's Bharuch district
Last Updated: Thursday, January 15, 2015 - 15:43
Ahmedabad: Three persons were killed and at least 10 others were injured in the clashes between two communities in and around Hansot town of Bharuch district on Thursday, police said.
"The situation is now under control as we have called in extra force. We are keeping a close watch," said Bharuch superintendent of police Bipin Ahire.
While one person died on the spot, two died at a hospital in Surat during the treatment. Ten persons were being treated at hospitals in Hansot, Bharuch and Surat, police said.
The clashes began following a scuffle between two groups over catching the kites in nearby Ambeta village during Makarsankranti celebrations today, said Ahire.
"This incident sparked tension in Ambeta and Hansot. People pelted stones. We also learnt that some shops were burnt down," he said.
According to local police, the tension started when a boy, belonging to the minority community, was thrashed by a youth for catching the kites in Ambeta village this morning.
(Yeah right. Nice try with the inversion. It's always the other way around. As seem in early years: Islamaniac youth thrash Hindu youth for flying kites, Hindus retaliate in kind [which is probably where the narration of events started in this clash] or else demonstrate, and islamaniacs - already gathered in huge numbers - then burn Hindu "religious places and shops" and police come to clamp Hindus from retaliating.
Anyway, with the deliberate inversion, christomedia is just making the whole "a minority boy was thrashed" into an excuse for projecting the islamic terrorism as "retaliation" - since an admission of largescale islamaniac attacks on Hindu "religious places and shops", see below, couldn't be left out of the news report. To imply "retaliation", christomedia had to invent an excuse for how the islamaniacs "justifiably" jihad-ed, instead of what they actually do: attacking Hindus for celebrating Hindoo festivals, the way christoislamaniacs attack Hindus everywhere in India, from India's christian NE and islamising West Bengal, as well as in islamic TSP-E and TSP-W
Soon, clashes also erupted in Hansot. According to police, religious places and shops were targeted.
(Note that "Soon clashes erupted" are the facts for which the "boy of the minority was thrashed for no good reason" is given as an excuse in the previous paragraph. Christomedia always inserts the excuse for jihad before presenting the severity of the facts of the jihad. It's a technique for psychological manipulation: to condition readers to sympathise with jihad/to justify it mentally.)
Police fired rounds of teargas shells to disperse the mob.
Police as well as the State Reserve Police personnel have been deployed in strength in both the places.
PTI
First Published: Thursday, January 15, 2015 - 15:43
"Shops burnt down" by one community because another community celebrated Makara Sankranti such as by flying kites.
To demystify the christomedia's ongoing silencing of genocide of Hindus (and whitewashing of jihad): muslims are famous for burning shops and pelting stones whenever Hindus celebrate their festivals. Christoislamaniacs don't celebrate Makara Sankranti.