06-28-2006, 06:22 PM
[quote=Husky,Jun 28 2006, 05:56 PM]
Well then,im agree whit what you say. I heard this theory from some indian nationalists that India do it all while they didnt bring trustfull suport evidence.This theory was in contradition whit all know.But dont worry ,i heard same things from kurds,germans or bulagrians. My belive is that are more cultures that contibuted more or less,influencing or being influence.I dont know what culture is the bigest all cultures but an least in Eurasia we see 4 big cultures Middle east,India,China ,Europe.
I was bring the word about Balkan neolithic culture because i see many similarites whit Indus Valley civilisation.let not be full by the fact that balkanic countries are less develop the West europeans.What is today wasn't alwais. <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo-->
No im not a roma,the word romani mean romanians.Al though i live next to gipsy,i was having collegs and enemies among them.The ting whit slavery,romanian peasents was not far from the gipsy situation. In fact many gipsy ,especialy those who do work in noble houses,have a better situation then romanian peasents who make hard working on the fields.My grand-grand father and other peasents was beting repetatly whit the whip by the boyars(nobles man),and this was hapening just before the second world war,when suposely Romania was a civilised country.Also many nobles who rule at that time was from diferent nations greeks,hungarians,muslim turks etc.My fathers and gipsy was in the same situation.
Being a indo-european speaker my self,find puzzeling how this linguistic family is spread so wierd especialy that genetic indians are diferent then europeans.was no close distance ,no big comercial rutes nothing to sugest a comon origin.
Hope that moderators will be kind and wouldnt erase my posts.
Well then,im agree whit what you say. I heard this theory from some indian nationalists that India do it all while they didnt bring trustfull suport evidence.This theory was in contradition whit all know.But dont worry ,i heard same things from kurds,germans or bulagrians. My belive is that are more cultures that contibuted more or less,influencing or being influence.I dont know what culture is the bigest all cultures but an least in Eurasia we see 4 big cultures Middle east,India,China ,Europe.
I was bring the word about Balkan neolithic culture because i see many similarites whit Indus Valley civilisation.let not be full by the fact that balkanic countries are less develop the West europeans.What is today wasn't alwais. <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo--> No im not a roma,the word romani mean romanians.Al though i live next to gipsy,i was having collegs and enemies among them.The ting whit slavery,romanian peasents was not far from the gipsy situation. In fact many gipsy ,especialy those who do work in noble houses,have a better situation then romanian peasents who make hard working on the fields.My grand-grand father and other peasents was beting repetatly whit the whip by the boyars(nobles man),and this was hapening just before the second world war,when suposely Romania was a civilised country.Also many nobles who rule at that time was from diferent nations greeks,hungarians,muslim turks etc.My fathers and gipsy was in the same situation.
Being a indo-european speaker my self,find puzzeling how this linguistic family is spread so wierd especialy that genetic indians are diferent then europeans.was no close distance ,no big comercial rutes nothing to sugest a comon origin.
Hope that moderators will be kind and wouldnt erase my posts.