haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=17898&SKIN=B
Also at:
news.rediff.com/commentary/2013/sep/21/i-have-faith-that-lord-rama-exists-solicitor-general-mohan-parasaran/48530c2d684aecdd9453da62677bd0c6
Was he called in to appear for the "prosecution" type side (a.o.t. the "defence") - don't know the terms, I am ignorant about law in general - and hence refused?
Or was it that he could have appeared in court and that he could have argued the case for preserving the Ramarsethu? Because if it's the latter...
It says here he's a lawyer for the UPA govt. So I think it's the first: he turned them down.
zeenews.india.com/news/nation/mohan-parasaran-to-be-elevated-as-solicitor-general_827926.html
But:
niticentral.com/2013/05/03/coalgate-upa-fields-solicitor-general-in-its-defence-73014.html
I mean, the Hindoos are Rama's vanara sena (albeit mortally wounded) - and so of primary interest to Sri Rama, as he is to them. So concerning coalgate, why not have stuck up for them - the populace - instead of the christogovt?
Anyway, back to the HK Ramarsethu news item:
But look how the christian central govt rejected out of hand even the TN govt's stand (on what is closer to TN than to the national capital in Delhi)? Christogovt decided long ago that the alternative alignments that don't break=destroy the sacred Hindoo bridge - despite being "better" overall - does not destroy Hinduism (christogovt's primary goal), therefore it is not what they want. Further underlining that the Congress is a christian govt.
I note Hindus are reduced to Libanios' "Pro Templis" - i.e. pleading that the christian state spare the natives' sacred heathen religious sites. But your enemy is christianism: don't you know it wills your religion to die? It planned the murder all this while and had signed the execution warrant.
So Hindoos lie bleeding here. They bleed, they bleed... to death it seems. Please stop bleeding all over me.
If you're going to die, just die already. But if you're going to live, then Fight damn it. You know I'd shoot you myself, if I just knew for certain that it was the former.
Quote:Solicitor General declines to appear on Ram Sethu case
22/09/2013 13:17:01 VSK Chennai
Solicitor General of India, Mohan Parasaran has declined to appear before Supreme Court on the Ram Sethu case.
"I have faith that Lord Rama exists and he used this bridge,' he said. UPA Govt has now asked Constitutional expert Rajeev Dhawan to appear for the shipping ministry.
Earlier, the Centre rejected the Tamil Nadu governmentââ¬â¢s stand that the Sethusamudram project must be scrapped ââ¬Åas the project is of questionable economic value and not in public interest.ââ¬Â
The Centre stated that it did not accept the conclusions and recommendations of the Expert Committee headed by Dr. Pachauri that it was unlikely that public interest would be served if the project was implemented as per Alignment No. 4A (alternative route suggested by the court as against the original Alignment No. 6, which will cut through the Ram Setu.)
Also at:
news.rediff.com/commentary/2013/sep/21/i-have-faith-that-lord-rama-exists-solicitor-general-mohan-parasaran/48530c2d684aecdd9453da62677bd0c6
Quote:I have faith that Lord Rama exists: Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran
September 21, 2013 20:11
Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran has declined to appear before Supreme Court on the Ram Sethu case.
"I have faith that Lord Rama exists and he used this bridge,' he said. UPA Govt today asked Constitutional expert Rajeev Dhawan to appear for the shipping ministry now.
Was he called in to appear for the "prosecution" type side (a.o.t. the "defence") - don't know the terms, I am ignorant about law in general - and hence refused?
Or was it that he could have appeared in court and that he could have argued the case for preserving the Ramarsethu? Because if it's the latter...
It says here he's a lawyer for the UPA govt. So I think it's the first: he turned them down.
zeenews.india.com/news/nation/mohan-parasaran-to-be-elevated-as-solicitor-general_827926.html
Quote:Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran is all set to be appointed as the new ... Mohan Parasaran, Solicitor General, UPA II. Last Updated: Saturday
Saturday, February 09, 2013, 00:28
Parasaran, a senior advocate of the Supreme Court and son of former Attorney General K Parasaran, was appointed as ASG by the first UPA government in July 2004. He continued in office in UPA II.
When asked about his priority as the second senior most law officer, Parasaran, said "We have to be responsive to the present needs of the society." He said matters relating to public interest would be his priority.
But:
niticentral.com/2013/05/03/coalgate-upa-fields-solicitor-general-in-its-defence-73014.html
Quote:Coalgate: UPA fields Solicitor General in its defenceWhat about sticking up for the population against the christo govt that scammed them of their wealth (again)? Otherwise why not take their Rama's bridge away from them too?
By Niticentral Staff on May 3, 2013
Amid allegations that the Government has altered the CBIââ¬â¢s probe report on Coalgate, an embarrassed UPA on Thursday fielded Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran in its defence. ...
I mean, the Hindoos are Rama's vanara sena (albeit mortally wounded) - and so of primary interest to Sri Rama, as he is to them. So concerning coalgate, why not have stuck up for them - the populace - instead of the christogovt?
Anyway, back to the HK Ramarsethu news item:
Quote:Earlier, the Centre rejected the Tamil Nadu governmentââ¬â¢s stand that the Sethusamudram project must be scrapped ââ¬Åas the project is of questionable economic value and not in public interest.ââ¬Â
The Centre stated that it did not accept the conclusions and recommendations of the Expert Committee headed by Dr. Pachauri that it was unlikely that public interest would be served if the project was implemented as per Alignment No. 4A (alternative route suggested by the court as against the original Alignment No. 6, which will cut through the Ram Setu.)
But look how the christian central govt rejected out of hand even the TN govt's stand (on what is closer to TN than to the national capital in Delhi)? Christogovt decided long ago that the alternative alignments that don't break=destroy the sacred Hindoo bridge - despite being "better" overall - does not destroy Hinduism (christogovt's primary goal), therefore it is not what they want. Further underlining that the Congress is a christian govt.
I note Hindus are reduced to Libanios' "Pro Templis" - i.e. pleading that the christian state spare the natives' sacred heathen religious sites. But your enemy is christianism: don't you know it wills your religion to die? It planned the murder all this while and had signed the execution warrant.
So Hindoos lie bleeding here. They bleed, they bleed... to death it seems. Please stop bleeding all over me.
If you're going to die, just die already. But if you're going to live, then Fight damn it. You know I'd shoot you myself, if I just knew for certain that it was the former.