07-28-2006, 12:07 AM
but i still havent got the reply i was hoping for??
what then is the objective of this thread, if not to piece by piece, provide all sorts of answers, which together will bury the AIT by comming up with a comprehensive alternate theory.
another question - if there is no difference of any kind between north indians and dravidians/south indians - then why is it that only the north indian languages and people have a connection with the children of parasu - both in their languages and feature/complexion. why isnt the agamas anything like the avesta, while the vedas and avesta are so similar.
see, you can answer or ignore these questions from me. but tommorow you will have to answer these same questions from the Witzelian fools. And if you dont hae a convincing enough answer at the ready, then AIT will be here to stay.
what then is the objective of this thread, if not to piece by piece, provide all sorts of answers, which together will bury the AIT by comming up with a comprehensive alternate theory.
another question - if there is no difference of any kind between north indians and dravidians/south indians - then why is it that only the north indian languages and people have a connection with the children of parasu - both in their languages and feature/complexion. why isnt the agamas anything like the avesta, while the vedas and avesta are so similar.
see, you can answer or ignore these questions from me. but tommorow you will have to answer these same questions from the Witzelian fools. And if you dont hae a convincing enough answer at the ready, then AIT will be here to stay.