07-28-2006, 12:31 AM
i have my answers or at least notions already.
those are somewhat in between the AIT and the OIT (out of india theory).
main points -
1) no invasion occured.
2) indus civilization is by the same people who wrote the vedas and then settled in the ganges valley after sindhu-saraswati wasnt good anymore.
3) iranians and north indians are more or less the same peole sharing a single cultural, genetic and religious pool.
4) all hinduism is of sanskritic manufacture. once upon a time only north india was hindu till Agastya muni and others exported hinduism to the south. "fair" tamils like ramesh krishnan are the descendants of the brahmins who went south. another north indian export is the brahmi script.
5) the dravidians are a people, with their own distinct language and religion (agama and other books based) who used to reside in their 13 odd "nadus" of which only 5 are in india, and the rest are in sundaland, sri lanka etc. google "lemuria".
6) tribals are the "vanabasis" mentioned in the ancient sanskrit texts and the hanuman and other monkey characters of ramayan are modelled on them. they were never in the caste system and the "scheduled tribe" thing is all sham. the tribals are no more the "original inheritors" of the subcontinent than the rest of us.
7) sanskritic/hindu influence has been exported out of india to places as far as ireland (druidism = poor man's hinduism), lithuania (their language is the most similar to sanskrit of all european languages), and europe in general. Also to middle east via the mittanis and hitties etc.
8) rig ved is 5000+ years old, as proved by its astronomical references and is older than the avesta. iranians are a breakway faction of sindhu saraswati civilization people, who moved out with their version of hinduism/vedas and then later came up with zorastrianism.
9) max muller and micheal witzel are inbred fools.
those are somewhat in between the AIT and the OIT (out of india theory).
main points -
1) no invasion occured.
2) indus civilization is by the same people who wrote the vedas and then settled in the ganges valley after sindhu-saraswati wasnt good anymore.
3) iranians and north indians are more or less the same peole sharing a single cultural, genetic and religious pool.
4) all hinduism is of sanskritic manufacture. once upon a time only north india was hindu till Agastya muni and others exported hinduism to the south. "fair" tamils like ramesh krishnan are the descendants of the brahmins who went south. another north indian export is the brahmi script.
5) the dravidians are a people, with their own distinct language and religion (agama and other books based) who used to reside in their 13 odd "nadus" of which only 5 are in india, and the rest are in sundaland, sri lanka etc. google "lemuria".
6) tribals are the "vanabasis" mentioned in the ancient sanskrit texts and the hanuman and other monkey characters of ramayan are modelled on them. they were never in the caste system and the "scheduled tribe" thing is all sham. the tribals are no more the "original inheritors" of the subcontinent than the rest of us.
7) sanskritic/hindu influence has been exported out of india to places as far as ireland (druidism = poor man's hinduism), lithuania (their language is the most similar to sanskrit of all european languages), and europe in general. Also to middle east via the mittanis and hitties etc.
8) rig ved is 5000+ years old, as proved by its astronomical references and is older than the avesta. iranians are a breakway faction of sindhu saraswati civilization people, who moved out with their version of hinduism/vedas and then later came up with zorastrianism.
9) max muller and micheal witzel are inbred fools.