06-13-2009, 10:39 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Jun 13 2009, 05:04 PM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Jun 13 2009, 05:04 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->I certainly never opposed it. The urheimat is up for grabs. And so, while the oryans are still total unknowns, I'm all for equal opportunity hypothesising. People can theorise away. (Personally, I'd like to see tangible, documented evidence for things that are claimed to be irrefutable historical fact - at least for matters that are this serious - before getting carried away with speculating.)
[right][snapback]98708[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
For me ,the linguistic evidence is convincing.Something happend there.But the rest of the theory is not so.My scientific historical curiosity is on the subject.
You can call wishfull thinking ,but i hope the jat-goth-getae conection is true in some way.My self being a dakia-getae.Especialy if jats have really a strong sense of justice,a feeling also dear to me.
[right][snapback]98708[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
For me ,the linguistic evidence is convincing.Something happend there.But the rest of the theory is not so.My scientific historical curiosity is on the subject.
You can call wishfull thinking ,but i hope the jat-goth-getae conection is true in some way.My self being a dakia-getae.Especialy if jats have really a strong sense of justice,a feeling also dear to me.