01-21-2011, 10:23 PM
Dhu, yes. And the pernicouos thing is the UPA is keeping its part of the bargain even when the other side has collpased and got changed. The no flag hosting on Jan 26 is a way of saying that defacto the Indian state writ doesnt run in Kashmir and is thus an expression of good faith. Tie this with GVK Pillai's statemeny on 25% troop cuts(later clarified to be only pararmilitary) and the six month verification less visas to Kashmiris on both sides). Its all moves per that plan. What is bothersome is Kasuri says Pranab Mukherjee, a sitting cabinet minister was part of the dialog and yet its being called trakc two? How can that be as its offical as it gets!
This defacto joint soverignity is a way to get around the PVNR 1992 Lok Sabha resolution which says the whole J&K is Indian.
Too bad for UPA that the Pakis couldnt hold their delight till it gets implemented. Most likely it was a intra Paki fight(Mushy's gang vs Zardari's gang) over who should get the credit for Kashmir Joint Sovereignity?
This defacto joint soverignity is a way to get around the PVNR 1992 Lok Sabha resolution which says the whole J&K is Indian.
Too bad for UPA that the Pakis couldnt hold their delight till it gets implemented. Most likely it was a intra Paki fight(Mushy's gang vs Zardari's gang) over who should get the credit for Kashmir Joint Sovereignity?