Radicalisation Of Indian Muslims

[Guest]

<b>The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India </b>
K.S. Lal
Voice of India, New Delhi

http://voi.org/books/tlmr/
Contents

Preface
Abbreviations used in references

Chapter 1 - The Medieval Age
Chapter 2 - Historiography of Medieval India
Chapter 3 - Muslims Invade India
Chapter 4 - Muslim Rule in India
Chapter 5 - Upper Classes and Luxurious Life
Chapter 6 - Middle Classes and Protest Movements
Chapter 7 - Lower Classes and Unmitigated Exploitation
Chapter 8 - The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India

Bibliography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Legacy_of...m_Rule_in_India


<b>Indian Muslims Who Are They </b>
K.S. Lal
Voice of India, New Delhi

http://www.challenging-islam.org/library/l...dianmuslims.htm
Contents

Indian Muslims : Prologue
Chapter 1 - Early Muslims
Chapter 2 - Rise of Muslims under the Sultanate
Chapter 3 - Proselytization in Provincial Muslim Kingdoms
Chapter 4 - Growth under the Mughals
Chapter 5 - Factors Contributing to the Growth of Muslim Population
Chapter 6 - Factors which Checked Islamization of India

Epilogue
Bibliography

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->
Return to Roots : Emancipation of Indian Muslims/K.S. Lal. New Delhi, Radha, 2002, xii, 182 p., ISBN 81-7487-245-0.

Contents:
Preface.
1. Islam fails to Islamize India.
2. Indian Muslims remain half-Hindus.
3. Islam versus Hinduism.
4. Indian Muslims at crossroads.
5. Competition in conversion.
6. Need to return to Hindu roots.
7. The world of Hinduism.
8. Advantages of home coming.
Bibliography. Index.

"Return to Roots : Emancipation of Indian Muslims is an attempt to educate Indian Muslims in this direction. The author’s earlier book, Indian Muslims: Who are they (1990), and the present one go together. The first discusses how Indian Muslims came into being, the second dwells on how they can return to their roots and to peace. Naturally there is some repetition in the two books, particularly with regard to the making of the Indian Muslim Community. V.S. Naipaul also deals with a similar theme. He does not deal with India but with Islamic countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran and Pakistan. But his study is very relevant to India also because Indian Muslims world-view is similar to the world-view of Muslims in other Islamic countries. His two books, Among the Believers (1980) and Beyond Belief: Excursions among the converted peoples (1998), also go together. They comprise oral history. Naipaul has found that countries which were once overrun by the revealed religions, are trying to seek their old links, their old religions. The phenomenon is world-wide. Europe and the Americas, in particular South America, which were once flooded with revealed religions are trying to rediscover their old deities, their old tribes. But it is different in Islamic countries. There Islamic fundamentalism suppresses freedom of inquiry. Among Muslims, the converts learn to lose regard for the land of their birth and the culture of their ancestors. They try to erase their past, and though they were once victims of an aggression, they are now on the side of the aggressor. This is exactly what has happened in India too. But India never became an Islamic country. Its ethos has continued to remain Hindu. Even Indian Muslims have not lost their Hindu moorings altogether. So, India can still be saved to live in peace.

"Arab Muslims call Indian Muslims Hindus. So also do the precision-seeking French. Therefore, if in place of asserting their separate identity, Indian Muslims could gather enough courage to reassert their original identity, all differences will disappear and peace will return to this vast land—from Afghanistan to Bangladesh and from Kashmir to Kanyakumari." (jacket) <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->