01-25-2006, 07:56 PM
Reminds me a lot about a mix of Hitler and Stalin's carreers.
meanwhile it reminds me those few peopel in all of history who rose to the occation and carried out their duty. cometh the hour, cometh the man.
linclon comes to mind - a political leader who became a millitary leader (sort of) when the time demanded
I guess dictator isn't such a stretch of the imagination.
it is - thinking of netaji as a dictator takes a lot of imagination and of a very bad type that too.
netaji was a leader first and last - he won the chairmanship of INC not by the sword. not by begging like the naked fakir either.
dictators are murderers/murderous from day one. saddam husain, mao et all.
netaji was first political leader and then, being versatile, a millitary leader. which dont make him a dictator.
Bose is a confusing character.
while you are a confused character.
Some of what he did seems alright, then other things bother me again.
and who are you to decide if bose was right or wrong??????
he is right if he seems right to you and not so if not????
Hitler was very patriotic.
and bose wasnt???
He unified the country and the willing German people.
no one has managed to unify indians yet - not even gandhi (the indian leader who for some reason had the max appeal). bose comes close in a different way - in that most of the youth of the whole nation back him to the hilt.
besides indian people, unlike germans, were anything but willing to join an armed struggle. they prevered gandhi's servile atitude and beggary.
It was "all for the love of his people and country". Nevertheless he was still adharmic.
who was?????
netaji??? and if he was adharmic so what???
whats dharma got to do with patriotism or nationalism???
and why the hell is dharma so important that you should bring it into all sorts of discussion - thats just what muslims do - judge everything from a koranic reference frame.
Does anyone have access to any letters or something that Bose wrote that indicate his intentions for an independent India, that is, what direction he saw it going/wanted it to go? It would clear up my mind about him once and for all.
[right][snapback]45577[/snapback][/right]
yes someone please supply the letters - she needs some serious mind clearing.
not that the oninion of a single person, that too no luminary, matters in regard to a towering personality such as bose.
for a start you could do well to learn that his main slogan and promise was "give me blood and i will give you freedom". so thats what his intention was. and after that he believed in a socialistic sort of industrialisation.
meanwhile it reminds me those few peopel in all of history who rose to the occation and carried out their duty. cometh the hour, cometh the man.
linclon comes to mind - a political leader who became a millitary leader (sort of) when the time demanded
I guess dictator isn't such a stretch of the imagination.
it is - thinking of netaji as a dictator takes a lot of imagination and of a very bad type that too.
netaji was a leader first and last - he won the chairmanship of INC not by the sword. not by begging like the naked fakir either.
dictators are murderers/murderous from day one. saddam husain, mao et all.
netaji was first political leader and then, being versatile, a millitary leader. which dont make him a dictator.
Bose is a confusing character.
while you are a confused character.
Some of what he did seems alright, then other things bother me again.
and who are you to decide if bose was right or wrong??????
he is right if he seems right to you and not so if not????
Hitler was very patriotic.
and bose wasnt???
He unified the country and the willing German people.
no one has managed to unify indians yet - not even gandhi (the indian leader who for some reason had the max appeal). bose comes close in a different way - in that most of the youth of the whole nation back him to the hilt.
besides indian people, unlike germans, were anything but willing to join an armed struggle. they prevered gandhi's servile atitude and beggary.
It was "all for the love of his people and country". Nevertheless he was still adharmic.
who was?????
netaji??? and if he was adharmic so what???
whats dharma got to do with patriotism or nationalism???
and why the hell is dharma so important that you should bring it into all sorts of discussion - thats just what muslims do - judge everything from a koranic reference frame.
Does anyone have access to any letters or something that Bose wrote that indicate his intentions for an independent India, that is, what direction he saw it going/wanted it to go? It would clear up my mind about him once and for all.
[right][snapback]45577[/snapback][/right]
yes someone please supply the letters - she needs some serious mind clearing.
not that the oninion of a single person, that too no luminary, matters in regard to a towering personality such as bose.
for a start you could do well to learn that his main slogan and promise was "give me blood and i will give you freedom". so thats what his intention was. and after that he believed in a socialistic sort of industrialisation.