08-10-2006, 11:38 AM
Bharatvarsha, when Ramakrishna Paramahamsa tried worshipping as a Muslim and Christian, he felt it lead him to the same realisation of Parabrahmam - probably because he did it in the same Hindu state he had always been in.
His results therefore had nothing to do with ChristoIslamism, but with his Hinduism. He was experiencing the same things, because his mental approach to God was the same as it had always been. He was under the wrong impression that he had tried out ChristoIslam. (Of course, no ChristoIslamist has ever had such an experience and will not acknowledge RKP's experiences. There are strict rules as to what experiences are valid in ChristoIslamism.)
As an experiment, RKP's was obviously a biased one.
I agree with you. All faiths are not valid. All natural religions are.
His results therefore had nothing to do with ChristoIslamism, but with his Hinduism. He was experiencing the same things, because his mental approach to God was the same as it had always been. He was under the wrong impression that he had tried out ChristoIslam. (Of course, no ChristoIslamist has ever had such an experience and will not acknowledge RKP's experiences. There are strict rules as to what experiences are valid in ChristoIslamism.)
As an experiment, RKP's was obviously a biased one.
I agree with you. All faiths are not valid. All natural religions are.