08-11-2006, 12:47 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-vishwas+Aug 10 2006, 11:19 PM-->QUOTE(vishwas @ Aug 10 2006, 11:19 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->rkumar, when Husky is talking about natural religions, he is talking about <b>nature religions</b>, i.e., religions with gods representing natural forces, and derivations thereof.
Basically, these are religions which have no defined beginning like the birth of a known prophet. The Hindu religion, the druids, the Hellenes and other forms of paganism are all nature religions or derivatives thereof.
[right][snapback]55398[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not even natural religions talk about same true.Is the same as in the case of dvaita advaita debates.
You cant say all religions are true,and our religion is superior because say that all all religios are true.You see the contradiction.?
You see a confruntation betwin natural versus personal religions?
Basically, these are religions which have no defined beginning like the birth of a known prophet. The Hindu religion, the druids, the Hellenes and other forms of paganism are all nature religions or derivatives thereof.
[right][snapback]55398[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not even natural religions talk about same true.Is the same as in the case of dvaita advaita debates.
You cant say all religions are true,and our religion is superior because say that all all religios are true.You see the contradiction.?
You see a confruntation betwin natural versus personal religions?