08-12-2006, 03:07 PM
I'll answer a few points though ...
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Let just say that those who know "self" their actions/ inaction depend on Supreme and Shastras dont try to Judge them.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This is not true. One should always judge the teacher before accepting him. Sanatan Dharma is not blind faith. After accepting a Guru, the Guru is God.
But this is a personal issue and hence I don't want to go further on RKP. I agree use of term weak guru needs explanation...but then why should anyone listen to mine. So I concur that direct questioning of RKP's status was not correct in a public forum ~ whatever be my idea about him.
However removing this slip comment of weak Guru ~ we were arguing about invalidity of RKP's teaching of universalism in context of Sanatan Dharma.
I haven't seen much in your replies on this particular point to argue more on this issue.
You have been saying things from universalism's perspective and falsely putting it that such is the behaviour of a "knower of self". Just to remind you, Rama and Krishna and Sri Shankaracharya are also accepted as knower of self (even as god himself) ~ yet they felt the need to draw boundaries in many of the important acts of their life.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Let just say that those who know "self" their actions/ inaction depend on Supreme and Shastras dont try to Judge them.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This is not true. One should always judge the teacher before accepting him. Sanatan Dharma is not blind faith. After accepting a Guru, the Guru is God.
But this is a personal issue and hence I don't want to go further on RKP. I agree use of term weak guru needs explanation...but then why should anyone listen to mine. So I concur that direct questioning of RKP's status was not correct in a public forum ~ whatever be my idea about him.
However removing this slip comment of weak Guru ~ we were arguing about invalidity of RKP's teaching of universalism in context of Sanatan Dharma.
I haven't seen much in your replies on this particular point to argue more on this issue.
You have been saying things from universalism's perspective and falsely putting it that such is the behaviour of a "knower of self". Just to remind you, Rama and Krishna and Sri Shankaracharya are also accepted as knower of self (even as god himself) ~ yet they felt the need to draw boundaries in many of the important acts of their life.