07-28-2005, 12:53 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->As for your insane posts about "Hindu unity", I think you and your ilk lack the brains and the vision to understand the implications of taking a purely political approach to religion. You will only harm Vedic dharma in the long run. A confused, hodgepodge theology, rampant heterodoxy, etc only weakens the fabric of Vedanta. Just take a close look at the history of world religions and you will see what I mean. As long as the banner of "Hinduism" is held by arrogant, scatterbrained politician-"saints", the serious spiritualists will shy away from that term. That is my observation.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sheer nonsense.
So standing up to defend Hinduism and expressing patriotism to India is considered "insanity"?
When a bunch of muslim barbarians attack your ISKCON temple and rape your women what do you plan to do?
Do you plan to hatch eggs and look the other way?
What would great Vaishnavas like Arjuna, Bhima etc... do in this case?
Why did Sri Chaitanya leave muslim Bengal and settle in Hindu ruled Orissa?
He was able to preach his philosophy only because the Hindu army of Orissa was giving him protection. In Muslim ruled Bengal he would have been impaled alive.
Where was your rogue organization when the Vaishnavas were storming Ayodhya and demolishing the Babri Masjid?
I talked to one ISKCON member of Indian origin at the local temple here about the Ayodhya issue. I said that every true Vaishnava must support the construction of the Sri Rama Mandira in Ayodhya. It is our duty to Bhagavan Vishnu.
The scoundrel replied back, "we would be better off worshipping Rama in our own hearts".
So there you have it. A classic buffon with no concept of our sacred duty to defend Vaidika Dharma.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Similarly, Sri Chaitanya praised the Buddha's mission in putting an end to the abuse of the Vedas by a corrupt Brahmanical order. But the major part of popular criticism is still reserved for the mayavadis and the atheists because of their denial of Ishvara, and their relativism. In that sense, the mayavadi position is far more dangerous and deviant than the dogmatic quirks of Churchianity and Islamism, which are at least positively monotheistic.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Observe the classic tactic used by him to try and break Vaishnavism apart from Hinduism. This is step one of the four-step process, listed by me in a previous post, of creating a new religion.
First he attacks traditional Vaidika Dharma by calling it a "corrupt Brahmanical order". This is a classic semetic tactic.
Next he proceeds to prove to how his sect is actually the orignal "pure" Vaidika religion before it was "corrupted" by Brahmanas.
Now comes the final icing on the cake - <i>"... is far more dangerous and deviant than the dogmatic quirks of Churchianity and Islamism, which are at least positively monotheistic."</i>
So there you have it. This is the final conclusion. We need to become closer to Xtianity and Islam in order to follow our own religion correctly.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sheer nonsense.
So standing up to defend Hinduism and expressing patriotism to India is considered "insanity"?
When a bunch of muslim barbarians attack your ISKCON temple and rape your women what do you plan to do?
Do you plan to hatch eggs and look the other way?
What would great Vaishnavas like Arjuna, Bhima etc... do in this case?
Why did Sri Chaitanya leave muslim Bengal and settle in Hindu ruled Orissa?
He was able to preach his philosophy only because the Hindu army of Orissa was giving him protection. In Muslim ruled Bengal he would have been impaled alive.
Where was your rogue organization when the Vaishnavas were storming Ayodhya and demolishing the Babri Masjid?
I talked to one ISKCON member of Indian origin at the local temple here about the Ayodhya issue. I said that every true Vaishnava must support the construction of the Sri Rama Mandira in Ayodhya. It is our duty to Bhagavan Vishnu.
The scoundrel replied back, "we would be better off worshipping Rama in our own hearts".
So there you have it. A classic buffon with no concept of our sacred duty to defend Vaidika Dharma.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Similarly, Sri Chaitanya praised the Buddha's mission in putting an end to the abuse of the Vedas by a corrupt Brahmanical order. But the major part of popular criticism is still reserved for the mayavadis and the atheists because of their denial of Ishvara, and their relativism. In that sense, the mayavadi position is far more dangerous and deviant than the dogmatic quirks of Churchianity and Islamism, which are at least positively monotheistic.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Observe the classic tactic used by him to try and break Vaishnavism apart from Hinduism. This is step one of the four-step process, listed by me in a previous post, of creating a new religion.
First he attacks traditional Vaidika Dharma by calling it a "corrupt Brahmanical order". This is a classic semetic tactic.
Next he proceeds to prove to how his sect is actually the orignal "pure" Vaidika religion before it was "corrupted" by Brahmanas.
Now comes the final icing on the cake - <i>"... is far more dangerous and deviant than the dogmatic quirks of Churchianity and Islamism, which are at least positively monotheistic."</i>
So there you have it. This is the final conclusion. We need to become closer to Xtianity and Islam in order to follow our own religion correctly.