04-06-2005, 04:53 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Mudy+Apr 4 2005, 03:04 AM-->QUOTE(Mudy @ Apr 4 2005, 03:04 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>China defines its borders </b>â <i>Lesson for India?</i> <!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->What does the article imply for Indiaâs border discussions with China? If a multi-faceted approach, as reflected in the article,is adopted by the Chinese during the border talks, India can expect a prolonged course of negotiations with no immediate concrete result. Secondly, the apparent over-emphasis given in the write-up on the âhistoric continuityâ of the contemporary China borders, indicates the possibilities of the Chinese side continuing to quote from history while presenting their claims. Thirdly, if a piece of disputed territory is important for it in strategic and military sense, the PRCâs position on such area could be uncompromising during talks. Specifically on disputed territories in Eastern Sector including Tawang, the Chinese may apply the âhistoricâ approach in open, with âstrategic interestâ in the back of their minds. The article, in essence, reflects the traditional Chinese position of always being territorially ambitious. As such, Premier Wenâs new âaccommodation of realityâ approach needs to be studied carefully by India for its practical implications.   <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Chinese pact with Nepal irks India
China"s decision to end India"s UN seat hopes
Keshto council has already ruled UNSC seat OUT for Indians who are target of International conspricy by US-UK-China.
Chinese pact with Nepal irks India
China"s decision to end India"s UN seat hopes
Keshto council has already ruled UNSC seat OUT for Indians who are target of International conspricy by US-UK-China.